Mats Eriksson

Prof. Mats Eriksson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2015 in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRicardo Carbajal
Ricardo Carbajal
MEMats Eriksson
Mats Eriksson
ECEmilie Courtois
Emilie Courtois
EBElaine Boyle
Elaine Boyle
AAAlejandro Avila-Alvarez
Alejandro Avila-Alvarez
KAKanwaljeet J. S. Anand
Kanwaljeet J. S. Anand

1 February 1997 in Acta Paediatrica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YSY Skogsdal
Y Skogsdal
MEMats Eriksson
Mats Eriksson
JSJ Schollin
J Schollin

3 March 2017 in Acta Paediatrica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KAKanwaljeet J. S. Anand
Kanwaljeet J. S. Anand
MEMats Eriksson
Mats Eriksson
EBElaine M. Boyle
Elaine M. Boyle
AAAlejandro Avila‐Alvarez
Alejandro Avila‐Alvarez
RARandi Dovland Andersen
Randi Dovland Andersen
TCthe EUROPAIN survey working group of the NeoOpioid Consortium
the EUROPAIN survey working group of the NeoOpioid Consortium
Aim: Continuous pain occurs routinely, even after invasive procedures, or inflammation and surgery, but clinical practices associated with assessments of continuous pain remain unknown.Methods: A prospective cohort study in 243 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) from 18 European countries recorded the frequency of pain assessments, use of mechanical ventilation, sedation, analgesia or neuromuscular blockade for each neonate for up to 28 days after NICU admission.Results: Only 2113 of 6648 (31.8%) of neonates received assessments of continuous pain, occurring variably among tracheal ventilation (TrV, 46.0%), noninvasive ventilation (NiV, 35.0%) and no ventilation (NoV, 20.1%) groups (p < 0.001). Daily assessments for continuous pain occurred in only 10.4% of all neonates (TrV: 14.0%, NiV: 10.7%, NoV: 7.6%; p < 0.001). More frequent assessments of continuous pain occurred in NICUs with pain guidelines, nursing champions and surgical admissions (all p < 0.01), and for newborns <32 weeks gestational age, those requiring ventilation, or opioids, sedatives‐hypnotics, general anaesthetics (O–SH–GA) (all p < 0.001), or surgery (p = 0.028). Use of O–SH–GA drugs increased the odds for pain assessment in the TrV (OR:1.60, p < 0.001) and NiV groups (OR:1.40, p < 0.001).Conclusion: Assessments of continuous pain occurred in less than one‐third of NICU admissions and daily in only 10% of neonates. NICU clinical practices should consider including routine assessments of continuous pain in newborns.

11 February 2022 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMarsha Campbell-Yeo
Marsha Campbell-Yeo
MEMats Eriksson
Mats Eriksson
BBBritney Benoit
Britney Benoit
Infants born preterm are at a high risk for repeated pain exposure in early life. Despite valid tools to assess pain in non-verbal infants and effective interventions to reduce pain associated with medical procedures required as part of their care, many infants receive little to no pain-relieving interventions. Moreover, parents remain significantly underutilized in provision of pain-relieving interventions, despite the known benefit of their involvement. This narrative review provides an overview of the consequences of early exposure to untreated pain in preterm infants, recommendations for a standardized approach to pain assessment in preterm infants, effectiveness of non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic pain-relieving interventions, and suggestions for greater active engagement of parents in the pain care for their preterm infant.

20 October 2017 in British Journal of Anaesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJM. Jaensson
M. Jaensson
KDK. Dahlberg
K. Dahlberg
MEMats Eriksson
Mats Eriksson
UNUlrica Nilsson
Ulrica Nilsson
Many patients undergoing anaesthesia and surgery experience postoperative complications. Our aim was to investigate whether a systematic follow-up smartphone-based assessment, using recovery assessment by phone points (RAPP) compared with standard care, had a positive effect on day surgery patients’ postoperative recovery. We also investigated whether there were differences in women and men's recovery and recovery scores. The study was a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial. A total of 997 patients were randomly allocated to either RAPP or standard care. The Swedish web version of a quality of recovery (SwQoR) questionnaire was used to evaluate the patients’ postoperative recovery, either on paper or using an application (RAPP) on postoperative days seven and 14. On postoperative day seven the RAPP group reported significantly better values in seven out of 24 items of the SwQoR: sleeping difficulties; not having a general feeling of wellbeing; having difficulty feeling relaxed/comfortable; and dizziness; headache; pain in the surgical wound; and a swollen surgical wound compared with the control group, implying a good postoperative recovery. Both men and women in the RAPP group reported significantly better values (and, hence good postoperative recovery) compared with the control group in the items sleeping difficulties; not having a general feeling of wellbeing and pain in the surgical wound. Measurement of patient-reported outcomes using a smartphone-based application was associated with decreased discomfort from several postoperative symptoms. Systematic e-assessment can thereby increase patients’ quality of recovery and identify key areas for improvement in perioperative care. NCT02492191.

1 August 2019 in Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MEMats Eriksson
Mats Eriksson
MCMarsha Campbell-Yeo
Marsha Campbell-Yeo