Craig Simmons

Prof. Craig Simmons

College of Science and Engineering & National Centre for GroundwaterResearch and Training, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in Advances in Water Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AWAdrian Werner
Adrian Werner
MBMark Bakker
Mark Bakker
VPVincent E.A. Post
Vincent E.A. Post
AVAlexander Vandenbohede
Alexander Vandenbohede
CLChunhui Lu
Chunhui Lu
DBD.A. Barry
D.A. Barry

23 February 2009 in Groundwater
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AWAdrian Werner
Adrian Werner
Craig SimmonsCraig Simmons
Craig Simmons

7 December 2011 in Groundwater
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Philip A. BrunnerPhilip A. Brunner
Philip A. Brunner
Craig SimmonsCraig Simmons
Craig Simmons

14 October 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJames Ward
James Ward
Paul SuttonPaul Sutton
Paul Sutton
AWAdrian Werner
Adrian Werner
Robert CostanzaRobert Costanza
Robert Costanza
SMSteve H. Mohr
Steve H. Mohr
Craig SimmonsCraig Simmons
Craig Simmons
The argument that human society can decouple economic growth—defined as growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP)—from growth in environmental impacts is appealing. If such decoupling is possible, it means that GDP growth is a sustainable societal goal. Here we show that the decoupling concept can be interpreted using an easily understood model of economic growth and environmental impact. The simple model is compared to historical data and modelled projections to demonstrate that growth in GDP ultimately cannot be decoupled from growth in material and energy use. It is therefore misleading to develop growth-oriented policy around the expectation that decoupling is possible. We also note that GDP is increasingly seen as a poor proxy for societal wellbeing. GDP growth is therefore a questionable societal goal. Society can sustainably improve wellbeing, including the wellbeing of its natural assets, but only by discarding GDP growth as the goal in favor of more comprehensive measures of societal wellbeing.

1 April 2016 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HKHamed Ketabchi
Hamed Ketabchi
DMDavood Mahmoodzadeh
Davood Mahmoodzadeh
BABehzad Ataie-Ashtiani
Behzad Ataie-Ashtiani
Craig SimmonsCraig Simmons
Craig Simmons

17 March 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YYYuting Yang
Yuting Yang
Huade GuanHuade Guan
Huade Guan
OBOkke Batelaan
Okke Batelaan
TMTim R. McVicar
Tim R. McVicar
DLDi Long
Di Long
Craig SimmonsCraig Simmons
Craig Simmons
Drought is an intermittent disturbance of the water cycle that profoundly affects the terrestrial carbon cycle. However, the response of the coupled water and carbon cycles to drought and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here we provide the first global synthesis of the drought effect on ecosystem water use efficiency (WUE = gross primary production (GPP)/evapotranspiration (ET)). Using two observational WUE datasets (i.e., eddy-covariance measurements at 95 sites (526 site-years) and global gridded diagnostic modelling based on existing observation and a data-adaptive machine learning approach), we find a contrasting response of WUE to drought between arid (WUE increases with drought) and semi-arid/sub-humid ecosystems (WUE decreases with drought), which is attributed to different sensitivities of ecosystem processes to changes in hydro-climatic conditions. WUE variability in arid ecosystems is primarily controlled by physical processes (i.e., evaporation), whereas WUE variability in semi-arid/sub-humid regions is mostly regulated by biological processes (i.e., assimilation). We also find that shifts in hydro-climatic conditions over years would intensify the drought effect on WUE. Our findings suggest that future drought events, when coupled with an increase in climate variability, will bring further threats to semi-arid/sub-humid ecosystems and potentially result in biome reorganization, starting with low-productivity and high water-sensitivity grassland.