Stan Lipkowitz

Dr. Stan Lipkowitz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 March 2011 in Breast Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KCKathryn J Chavez
Kathryn J Chavez
SGSireesha V Garimella
Sireesha V Garimella
SLStan Lipkowitz
Stan Lipkowitz


12 May 2020 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ELErika J. Lampert
Erika J. Lampert
AZAlexandra Zimmer
Alexandra Zimmer
MPMichelle Padget
Michelle Padget
ACAshley Cimino-Mathews
Ashley Cimino-Mathews
JNJayakumar R. Nair
Jayakumar R. Nair
JLJung-Min Lee
Jung-Min Lee
Purpose: Preclinical studies suggest PARP inhibition (PARPi) induces immunostimulatory micromilieu in ovarian cancer thus complementing activity of immune checkpoint blockade. We conducted a phase II trial of PARPi olaparib and anti–PD-L1 durvalumab and collected paired fresh core biopsies and blood samples to test this hypothesis. Patients and Methods: In a single-center, proof-of-concept phase II study, we enrolled women aged ≥18 with recurrent ovarian cancer. All patients were immune checkpoint inhibitor–naïve and had measurable disease per RECISTv1.1, ECOG performance status 0–2, and adequate organ and marrow function. Patients received olaparib 300 mg twice daily and durvalumab 1,500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives were safety and progression-free survival (PFS). Translational objectives included biomarker evaluation for relationships with clinical response and immunomodulatory effects by treatment. Results: Thirty-five patients with ovarian cancer [median, four prior therapies (IQR, 2–5.5), predominantly platinum-resistant (86%), BRCA wild-type (77%)] received at least one full cycle of treatment. ORR was 14% [5/35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.8%–30.3%]. Disease control rate (PR+SD) was 71% (25/35; 95% CI, 53.7%–85.4%). Treatment enhanced IFNγ and CXCL9/CXCL10 expression, systemic IFNγ/TNFα production, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, indicating an immunostimulatory environment. Increased IFNγ production was associated with improved PFS [HR, 0.37 (95% CI, 0.16–0.87), P = 0.023], while elevated VEGFR3 levels were associated with worse PFS (HR, 3.22 (95% CI, 1.23–8.40), P = 0.017]. Conclusions: The PARPi and anti–PD-L1 combination showed modest clinical activity in recurrent ovarian cancer. Our correlative study results suggest immunomodulatory effects by olaparib/durvalumab in patients and indicate that VEGF/VEGFR pathway blockade would be necessary for improved efficacy of the combination.

30 January 2020 in Journal of Experimental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JTJuan Tang
Juan Tang
STSha Tu
Sha Tu
GLGuoxin Lin
Guoxin Lin
HGHui Guo
Hui Guo
CYChengkai Yan
Chengkai Yan
JZJian Zhang
Jian Zhang
Aberrant NLRP3 inflammasome activation contributes to the development of endotoxemia. The importance of negative regulation of NLRP3 inflammasomes remains poorly understood. Here, we show that the E3 ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b is essential for preventing endotoxemia induced by a sub-lethal dose of LPS via a caspase-11/NLRP3–dependent manner. Further studies show that NLRP3 undergoes both K63- and K48-linked polyubiquitination. Cbl-b binds to the K63-ubiquitin chains attached to the NLRP3 leucine-rich repeat domain (LRR) via its ubiquitin-associated region (UBA) and then targets NLRP3 at K496 for K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated degradation. We also identify RNF125 as an additional E3 ubiquitin ligase that initiates K63-linked ubiquitination of the NLRP3 LRR domain. Therefore, NLRP3 is sequentially ubiquitinated by K63- and K48-linked ubiquitination, thus keeping the NLRP3 inflammasomes in check and restraining endotoxemia.

12 February 2008 in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMonzur Rahman
Monzur Rahman
SDSean Davis
Sean Davis
JPJanet G. Pumphrey
Janet G. Pumphrey
JBJing Bao
Jing Bao
MNMarion M. Nau
Marion M. Nau
SLStan Lipkowitz
Stan Lipkowitz

14 June 2010 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKStephen C. Kales
Stephen C. Kales
PRPhilip E. Ryan
Philip E. Ryan
MNMarion M. Nau
Marion M. Nau
SLStan Lipkowitz
Stan Lipkowitz
Cbl was originally discovered in 1989 as the cellular homolog of the v-Cbl oncogene, the transforming gene of the Cas NS-1 murine retrovirus that causes myeloid leukemia and lymphomas in mice. Cbl is a member of a family of RING finger ubiquitin ligases that negatively regulate signaling by tyrosine kinases and that function as adaptor proteins to regulate signaling positively. Until the past 2 years, there was little evidence that Cbl proteins were involved in human malignancies. Recent publications have shown homozygous mutations in Cbl in human myeloid neoplasms. Although in vitro and animal transformation models suggested that mutant forms of Cbl acted as an oncogene, the cellular role suggested that the protein could serve as a tumor suppressor gene. The recent data begin to reconcile this paradox as the loss of ubiquitin ligase function (the tumor suppressor function) is coupled to the maintenance of the positive signaling function (the oncogene function). These data also provide insight into potential therapeutic approaches to myeloid disorders harboring Cbl mutations. Cancer Res; 70(12); 4789–94. ©2010 AACR.