William Greenhalf

Prof. William Greenhalf

Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 June 2005 in Gut
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMC D McFaul
C D McFaul
WGWilliam Greenhalf
William Greenhalf
Julie EarlJulie Earl
Julie Earl
NHN Howes
N Howes
JNJohn P. Neoptolemos
John P. Neoptolemos
DBD K Bartsch
D K Bartsch
Background: Previous studies of anticipation in familial pancreatic cancer have been small and subject to ascertainment bias. Our aim was to determine evidence for anticipation in a large number of European families. Patients and methods: A total of 1223 individuals at risk from 106 families (264 affected individuals) were investigated. Generation G3 was defined as the latest generation that included any individual aged over 39 years; preceding generations were then defined as G2 and G1. Results: With 80 affected child-parent pairs, the children died a median (interquartile range) of 10 (7, 14) years earlier. The median (interquartile range) age of death from pancreatic cancer was 70 (59, 77), 64 (57, 69), and 49 (44, 56) years for G1, G2, and G3, respectively. These indications of anticipation could be the result of bias. Truncation of Kaplan-Meier analysis to a 60 year period to correct for follow up time bias and a matched test statistic indicated significant anticipation (p = 0.002 and p<0.001). To minimise bias further, an iterative analysis to predict cancer numbers was developed. No single risk category could be applied that accurately predicted cancer cases in every generation. Using three risk categories (low with no pancreatic cancer in earlier generations, high with a single earlier generation, and very high where two preceding generations were affected), incidence was estimated without significant error. Anticipation was independent of smoking. Conclusion: This study provides the first strong evidence for anticipation in familial pancreatic cancer and must be considered in genetic counselling and the commencement of secondary screening for pancreatic cancer.

20 May 2014 in Molecular Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VSVictoria E Shaw
Victoria E Shaw
BLBrian Lane
Brian Lane
CJClaire Jenkinson
Claire Jenkinson
TCTrevor Cox
Trevor Cox
WGWilliam Greenhalf
William Greenhalf
ECEithne Costello-Goldring
Eithne Costello-Goldring
We investigated whether combinations of serum cytokines, used with logistic disease predictor models, could facilitate the detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

17 December 2018 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TNTAOUFIK NEDJADI
TAOUFIK NEDJADI
AEAnthony Evans
Anthony Evans
ASAdnan Sheikh
Adnan Sheikh
LBLawrence Barerra
Lawrence Barerra
SASuliman Al-Ghamdi
Suliman Al-Ghamdi
ECEithne Costello-Goldring
Eithne Costello-Goldring
The secretion of soluble factors enables communication between tumour cells and the surrounding microenvironment and plays an important role in oncogenesis. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterised by a highly reactive microenvironment, harbouring a variety of cell types, including S100A8/S100A9-expressing monocytes. S100A8/S100A9 proteins regulate the behaviour of cancer cells by inducing pre-metastatic cascades associated with cancer spread. The aim of this study was to examine how S100A8/A9 proteins mediate tumour-stroma crosstalk in PDAC. Cytokine profiling of pancreatic cancer cell-derived conditioned media was performed using Bio-Plex Pro 27 Plex Human Cytokine assays. Protein expression and activation of downstream signalling effectors and NF-κB were assessed by western blotting analysis and reporter assays respectively. Stimulation of cultured pancreatic cancer cells with S100A8 and S100A9 increased the secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-8, TNF-α, and FGF. S100A8, but not S100A9 induced PDGF secretion. Conversely, pancreatic cancer cell-derived conditioned media and the individual cytokines, TNF-α and TGF-β induced the expression of S100A8 and S100A9 proteins in the HL-60 monocytic cell line and primary human monocytes, while FGF and IL-8 induced the expression of S100A9 only. S100A8 and S100A9 activated MAPK and NF-κB signalling in pancreatic cancer. This was partially mediated via activation of the receptor of advanced glycosylation end-product (RAGE). S100A8 and S100A9 proteins induce specific cytokine secretion from PDAC cells, which in turn enhances the expression of S100A8/A9. This paracrine crosstalk could have implications for PDAC invasiveness and metastatic potential.

7 March 2023 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAhmed Abdullah Ahmed
Ahmed Abdullah Ahmed
WGWilliam Greenhalf
William Greenhalf
DPDaniel H. Palmer
Daniel H. Palmer
NWNicole Williams
Nicole Williams
JWJenny Worthington
Jenny Worthington
SNStephen Neidle
Stephen Neidle
The naphthalene diimide compound QN-302, designed to bind to G-quadruplex DNA sequences within the promoter regions of cancer-related genes, has high anti-proliferative activity in pancreatic cancer cell lines and anti-tumor activity in several experimental models for the disease. We show here that QN-302 also causes downregulation of the expression of the S100P gene and the S100P protein in cells and in vivo. This protein is well established as being involved in key proliferation and motility pathways in several human cancers and has been identified as a potential biomarker in pancreatic cancer. The S100P gene contains 60 putative quadruplex-forming sequences, one of which is in the promoter region, 48 nucleotides upstream from the transcription start site. We report biophysical and molecular modeling studies showing that this sequence forms a highly stable G-quadruplex in vitro, which is further stabilized by QN-302. We also report transcriptome analyses showing that S100P expression is highly upregulated in tissues from human pancreatic cancer tumors, compared to normal pancreas material. The extent of upregulation is dependent on the degree of differentiation of tumor cells, with the most poorly differentiated, from more advanced disease, having the highest level of S100P expression. The experimental drug QN-302 is currently in pre-IND development (as of Q1 2023), and its ability to downregulate S100P protein expression supports a role for this protein as a marker of therapeutic response in pancreatic cancer. These results are also consistent with the hypothesis that the S100P promoter G-quadruplex is a potential therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer at the transcriptional level for QN-302.

1 June 2011 in Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WGWilliam Greenhalf
William Greenhalf
ATAmy Thomas
Amy Thomas
Treatment of pancreatic cancer should be a relatively simple clinical problem, all that is needed is to find the features of pancreatic cancer cells that distinguish them from normal cells and target these differences. This is the basis of current therapies including gemcitabine and 5-FU which target DNA synthesis. Unfortunately, cancer cells become resistant to these therapies: By exclusion of drugs from cancer cells; by changes in enzymes metabolising the drugs; or by becoming more resistant to stress and apoptosis. Increasing levels of the drugs is limited by their somatic toxicity so numerous alternative therapies have been proposed. Testing these alternatives in clinical trials will be difficult unless they work with the standard treatments (e.g. gemcitabine). To date most work has concentrated on combining different S-phase targeting agents. Further incremental increase in survival benefit should be possible by targeting resistance to apoptosis, targeting stroma or even targeting multiple pathways in combination with gemcitabine.

1 January 2016
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
VSVictoria Shaw
Victoria Shaw
KBKatie Bullock
Katie Bullock
WGWilliam Greenhalf
William Greenhalf