Wenzhao Guo

Dr. Wenzhao Guo

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS& MWR, Xianyang, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2021 in International Soil and Water Conservation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PTPei Tian
Pei Tian
ZZZhanliang Zhu
Zhanliang Zhu
QYQimeng Yue
Qimeng Yue
YHYi He
Yi He
ZZZhaoyi Zhang
Zhaoyi Zhang
MLMuxing Liu
Muxing Liu

1 February 2020 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Wenzhao GuoWenzhao Guo
Wenzhao Guo
Zhuoxin ChenZhuoxin Chen
Zhuoxin Chen
WWWenlong Wang
Wenlong Wang
WGWen-Wang Gao
Wen-Wang Gao
MGMing-Ming Guo
Ming-Ming Guo
MZMan Zhao
Man Zhao

29 February 2024 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YXYangguang Xu
Yangguang Xu
LLLi Luo
Li Luo
Wenzhao GuoWenzhao Guo
Wenzhao Guo
ZJZhao Jin
Zhao Jin
PTPei Tian
Pei Tian
WWWenglong Wang
Wenglong Wang
Extreme rainfall events pose a severe challenge to soil and water conservation, even in areas with high vegetation cover on the Loess Plateau. In this study, the artificial extreme rainfalls with cumulative rainfall of 270 mm and intensity of 60 mm · hr−1 were conducted on in‐situ experimental plots (20 × 2.5 m) on a loess gully–slope with gradients of 35°–40° that were treated with different grass coverage: (0%, 30%–40%, 70%–80%, >90%). The ephemeral gully/rill and shallow landslide occurred in plots were analyzed. Revegetation changed the erosion type on gully–slope, reducing gully erosion but promoting shallow landslide due to the change from infiltration–excess runoff to saturation–excess runoff. Under grass coverage of >90%, over 95% of rainfall seeped into the soil, and subsurface flow was generated due to the lower saturated hydraulic conductivity of underlying soil, which increased the possibility of landslides. The average erosion rate (0.36–3.29 g · m−2 min−1; no obvious erosion) in plots with 70%–80% coverage was 95.5% lower than that in bare land plots (27.8–47.5 g · m−2 min−1; ephemeral gully erosion), while due to landslides the average erosion rate in plots with >90% coverage (135.1–184.3 g · m−2 min−1) was 86.5 times higher than that in plots with 70%–80%. For grass, a coverage of 70%–80% was most effective in preventing soil erosion, controlling gully erosion and preventing landslides under extreme rainfall. These results deepen the understanding of the complex relationship between vegetation, gully erosion, and landslides in ecologically sensitive areas.

1 February 2020 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Wenzhao GuoWenzhao Guo
Wenzhao Guo
XXXiangzhou Xu
Xiangzhou Xu
WWWenlong Wang
Wenlong Wang
TZTongxin Zhu
Tongxin Zhu
YLYakun Liu
Yakun Liu

17 September 2020 in Land Degradation & Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Wenzhao GuoWenzhao Guo
Wenzhao Guo
YBYun Bai
Yun Bai
ZCZhiqiang Cui
Zhiqiang Cui
WWWenlong Wang
Wenlong Wang
JLJianming Li
Jianming Li
ZSZhengan Su
Zhengan Su

19 January 2021 in Journal of Mountain Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Wenzhao GuoWenzhao Guo
Wenzhao Guo
WWWenlong Wang
Wenlong Wang
QXQiang Xu
Qiang Xu
JHJian-Jun Hu
Jian-Jun Hu
LZLi-Li Zhu
Li-Li Zhu