Mining strip coal pillars left due to strip mining is important to resource-exhausted coal mines in eastern China. Backfilling mining is an effective means to mine strip coal pillars, which could decrease high stress and high energy release. However, materials with super-high water content were not widely applied in deeply isolated coal pillar mining due to lower strength characteristics and durability. In the paper, taking panel c8301 as engineering background, theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and field monitoring were used to study the feasibility and application effect of the super-high-water backfilling technology in deep isolated coal pillar mining. The results showed that: (1) Panel c8301 is a strip-filling working face with insufficient mining on both sides, and the mining of the panel will trigger the rebalancing of the overlying rock structure on both sides, which increases the rock burst risk. (2) Simulation results indicate that the super-high-water filling method, in comparison to the traditional caving method, significantly reduces peak stress and elastic energy from 112.3 MPa to 4.6 × 106 J to 79.2 MPa and 2.23 × 106 J, respectively. This represents reductions of 29.6 % and 51.5 %, effectively mitigating the impact of mining activities on overburden movement. (3) On-site measurement data confirmed that the measured equivalent mining height was 1.25 m. The total number of microseisms and the amount of released energy decreased significantly, More specifically, three big energy release instances (>1.8 × 105 J) were recorded during the first roof weighting stage and panel in square meters. Super-high-water filling technology has achieved remarkable results in the mining of strip coal pillars and has significant application prospects.
Microseismic monitoring systems (MMS) have become increasingly crucial in detecting tremors in coal mining. Microseismic sensors (MS), integral components of MMS, profoundly influence positioning accuracy and energy calculations. Hence, calibrating these sensors holds immense importance. To bridge the research gap in MS calibration, this study conducted a systematic investigation. The main conclusions are as follows: based on calibration tests on 102 old MS using the CS18VLF vibration table, it became evident that certain long-used MS in coal mines exhibited significant deviations in frequency and amplitude measurements, indicating sensor failure. Three important calibration indexes, frequency deviation, amplitude deviation, and amplitude linearity are proposed to assess the performance of MS. By comparing the index of old and new MS, critical threshold values were established to evaluate sensor effectiveness. A well-functioning MS exhibits an absolute frequency deviation below 5%, an absolute amplitude deviation within 55%, and amplitude linearity surpassing 0.95. In normal operations, the frequency deviation of MS is significantly smaller than the amplitude deviation. Simplified waveform analysis has unveiled a linear connection between amplitude deviation and localization results. An analysis of the Gutenberg–Richter microseismic energy calculation formula found that the microseismic energy calculation is influenced by both the localization result and amplitude deviation, making it challenging to pinpoint the exact impact of amplitude deviation on microseismic energy. Reliable MS, as well as a robust MS, serve as the fundamental cornerstone for acquiring dependable microseismic data and are essential prerequisites for subsequent microseismic data mining. The insights and findings presented here provide valuable guidance for future MS calibration endeavors and ultimately can guarantee the dependability of microseismic data.