The two objectives of this systematic review were to examine the following: (1) the difference in sensory processing areas (auditory, visual, vestibular, touch, proprioceptive, and multi-sensory) between children with and without developmental coordination disorder (DCD), and (2) the relationship between sensory processing and motor coordination in DCD. The following databases were comprehensively searched for relevant articles: PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Cochrane library. There were 1107 articles (published year = 2010 to 2021) found in the initial search. Full-text articles of all possibly relevant citations were obtained and inspected for suitability by two authors. The outcome measures were sensory processing impairments and their relationship with motor coordination. A total of 10 articles met the inclusion criteria. Children with DCD showed significant impairments in visual integration, tactile integration, proprioceptive integration, auditory integration, vestibular integration, and oral integration processes when compared with typically developing children. Evidence also supported that sensory processing impairments were associated with poor motor coordination in DCD. Preliminary support indicated that DCD have sensory processing impairments in visual, tactile, proprioceptive, auditory, and vestibular areas, which might contribute to participation restriction in motor activities. It is important to apply sensory integration therapy in rehabilitation programs for DCD in order to facilitate participation in daily activities.

Objective: Despite the relatively high prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the impairment of ADHD in women is underestimated due to the different ways the phenomenon manifests compared to traditional male symptoms. In order to close the gender gap in diagnosis and treatment, this study aims to explore the impact of gender on auditory and visual attention in children with and without ADHD. Method: A total of 220 children with and without ADHD participated in this study. Their auditory and visual attention performances were analyzed by comparative computerized auditory and visual subtests. Results: Auditory and visual attention performance in children with and without ADHD did affect by gender, including typically developing (TD) boys are better than TD girls at distinguishing visual targets from non-target stimuli. When performing attention tasks, TD girls generally maintained a cautious response, which was different from TD boys, who generally adopted positive response methods. ADHD girls suffered from more serious auditory inattention problems than ADHD boys; however, ADHD boys suffered from more auditory and visual impulsive problems than ADHD girls. The internal attention problems of female ADHD children were broader than that of their male ADHD peers and were also more severe, especially in problems of auditory omission and auditory response acuity. Conclusions: ADHD children had a significant gap in auditory and visual attention performance compared to TD children. The research results support the impact of gender on the performance of auditory and visual attention in children with and without ADHD.

This study aimed to examine the group differences in participation level between children with and without global delays and to explore the associations between mastery motivation, executive function, and participation in young children with and without global developmental delays (GDD). Methods: we recruited 26 children with GDD aged 2 to 5 years and 26 children with sex- and mental age-matched developing typically (TD). The participants were assessed child development using the standardized developmental test, and their mothers were asked to fill in questionnaires, including the revised Dimension of Mastery Questionnaire (DMQ 18) with preschool version to assess mastery motivation, the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function with preschool version (BRIEF-P) to assess executive function, and the Young Children’s Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM) used to obtain participation levels. Results and conclusions: young children with GDD showed significantly lower participation levels at home, daycare, and community than TD group. We found that for young children, child mastery pleasure, health condition, and total persistence were significant predictors of child participation. Therefore, coaching parents to observe and facilitate their children’s motivation and executive function, as well as child developmental abilities, is important in order to enhance children’s participation in daily activities.

This practice-based implementation report describes the adoption of the My Abilities First (MAF) initiative for children with developmental delays in Taiwan. Grounded in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework, MAF emphasizes a strengths-based, participatory, and human rights-oriented approach to early childhood intervention. The purpose of this report is to describe the development of the MAF framework and the details of its innovative, culturally sensitive implementation in Taiwan, using implementation science principles to support the national adoption of My Abilities ID Cards (ABIDs). Central to the MAF initiative is the ABID, a tool that empowers children to express their abilities, preferences, and support needs using their own voice or preferred mode of communication. Guided by implementation science, the MAF team in Taiwan engaged stakeholders in urban and rural centers, developed training programs, and integrated ABID into early intervention and special education systems. Preliminary outcomes indicate that from 2021 to 2025, 140 training sessions reached a total attendance of 6961. Notably, satisfaction with training was high (>95%), and practitioner subjective competence adopting positive language improved. The number of children under age 12 creating ABIDs grew to approximately 700. Preliminary evidence suggests that ABIDs might increase systematic adoption of children’s opinions in assessments and interventions. Qualitative feedback from parents and professionals highlights the contribution of ABIDs, ensuring self-expression, motivation, and meaningful participation. The pioneering Taiwanese experience demonstrates the feasibility and impact of MAF and ABIDs in promoting children’s rights and participation, offering practical insights for global adaptation in diverse contexts.

Background/Objectives: Child temperament and mastery motivation are key factors for future child competencies. Therefore, two purposes of this study were: (1) to compare temperament characteristics in children with global developmental delay (GDD) and typical development (TD); (2) to explore the relations among child temperament and mastery motivation in GDD and TD groups. This study design was cross-sectional. Methods: Participants included 26 children with GDD (ages 2–5) recruited from clinical settings in Central Taichung. A comparison group of 26 TD children, matched for sex and mental age, was subsequently enrolled through community advertisements and local early childhood centers. The participants were invited to our laboratory in order to conduct child development assessment using the Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infants and Toddlers, and their mothers were asked to fill in questionnaires, including the revised Dimension of Mastery Questionnaire (DMQ 18) with preschool version to assess mastery motivation and the Child Behavior Questionnaire—Short Form to obtain three dimensions of child temperament (surgency/extraversion, negative affect, effortful control). Correlations and hierarchical regressions were used to examine associations (p < 0.05, two-tailed). Results: Children with GDD exhibited higher extraversion and lower effortful control than children with TD, whereas no group difference was observed in negative affect. Domain-specific relationships between child temperament and mastery motivation were found in both the GDD and TD groups. Conclusions: These findings suggest that early childhood practitioners should consider children’s temperamental and mastery motivation characteristics, identify individual strengths and weaknesses, and design strength-based intervention strategies to promote engagement in daily activities within natural settings.