Chemotherapies may increase mutagenesis of healthy cells and change the selective pressures in tissues, thus influencing their evolution. However, their contributions to the mutation burden and clonal expansions of healthy somatic tissues are not clear. Here, exploiting the mutational footprint of some chemotherapies, we explore their influence on the evolution of hematopoietic cells. Cells of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) secondary to treatment with platinum-based drugs show the mutational footprint of these drugs, indicating that non-malignant blood cells receive chemotherapy mutations. No trace of the 5-fluorouracil (5FU) mutational signature is found in AMLs secondary to exposure to 5FU, suggesting that cells establishing the leukemia could be quiescent during treatment. Using the platinum-based mutational signature as a barcode, we determine that the clonal expansion originating the secondary AMLs begins after the start of the cytotoxic treatment. Its absence in clonal hematopoiesis cases is consistent with the start of the clonal expansion predating the exposure to platinum-based drugs.

Despite emerging molecular information on chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), patient outcome remains unsatisfactory and little is known about the transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In a single-center cohort of 219 CMML patients, we explored the potential correlation between clinical features, gene mutations, and treatment regimens with overall survival (OS) and clonal evolution into AML. The most commonly detected mutations were TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1, and RUNX1. Median OS was 34 months and varied according to age, cytogenetic risk, FAB, CPSS and CPSS-Mol categories, and number of gene mutations. Hypomethylating agents were administered to 37 patients, 18 of whom responded. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) was performed in 22 patients. Two-year OS after alloSCT was 60.6%. Six patients received targeted therapy with IDH or FLT3 inhibitors, three of whom attained a long-lasting response. AML transformation occurred in 53 patients and the analysis of paired samples showed changes in gene mutation status. Our real-world data emphasize that the outcome of CMML patients is still unsatisfactory and alloSCT remains the only potentially curative treatment. However, targeted therapies show promise in patients with specific gene mutations. Complete molecular characterization can help to improve risk stratification, understand transformation, and personalize therapy.

Germ line predisposition in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has gained attention in recent years because of a nonnegligible frequency and an impact on management of patients and their relatives. Risk alleles for AML development may be present in patients without a clinical suspicion of hereditary hematologic malignancy syndrome. In this study we investigated the presence of germ line variants (GVs) in 288 genes related to cancer predisposition in 47 patients with available paired, tumor-normal material, namely bone marrow stroma cells (n = 29), postremission bone marrow (n = 17), and saliva (n = 1). These patients correspond to 2 broad AML categories with heterogeneous genetic background (AML myelodysplasia related and AML defined by differentiation) and none of them had phenotypic abnormalities, previous history of cytopenia, or strong cancer aggregation. We found 11 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, 6 affecting genes related to autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndromes (ATM, DDX41, and CHEK2) and 5 related to autosomal recessive bone marrow failure syndromes (FANCA, FANCM, SBDS, DNAJC21, and CSF3R). We did not find differences in clinical characteristics nor outcome between carriers of GVs vs noncarriers. Further studies in unselected AML cohorts are needed to determine GV incidence and penetrance and, in particular, to clarify the role of ATM nonsense mutations in AML predisposition.

Mutations commonly associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), such as CEBPA, FLT3, IDH1/2, and NPM1, are rarely found in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and their prognostic significance in CMML has not been clearly identified. In 127 patients with CMML, we have retrospectively analyzed next-generation sequencing and polymerase chain reaction data from bone marrow samples collected at the time of CMML diagnosis. Seven patients harbored CEBPA mutations, 8 FLT3 mutations, 12 IDH1 mutations, 26 IDH2 mutations, and 11 NPM1 mutations. Patients with CMML harboring CEBPA, FLT3, and/or NPM1 mutations (mutCFN) more frequently had the myeloproliferative subtype, a high prevalence of severe cytopenia, and elevated blast counts. Regardless of their CMML Prognostic Scoring System molecular classification, mutCFN patients with CMML had a poor prognosis, and the multivariate analysis identified mutCFN as an independent marker of overall survival. The genetic profile of these mutCFN patients with CMML closely resembled that of patients with AML, with higher-risk clinical characteristics. Our findings lead us to suggest including the assessment of these mutations in CMML prognostic models and treating these patients with AML-type therapies, including intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation, whenever feasible. Furthermore, certain targeted therapies approved for use in AML should be considered.

Background: Even though venetoclax in combination with azacitidine (VenAza) is considered a low-intensity regimen, its patients present a high incidence of cytopenia and infections during the first courses, making the initial management a challenging phase. Methods: This difficulty in our center led to the establishment of an At-Home (AH) program for ramp-up and follow-up patients during the VenAza combination induction phase focused on therapy administration, patient and caregiver education, and management of adverse events (AEs). A total of 70 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML) or relapsed/refractory AML (R/R AML) were treated with VenAza from March 2019 to May 2022. We compared outcomes between patients managed with a hospital-based (inpatient) approach and those managed through the AH program. Results: Despite most patients experiencing grade 3–4 cytopenias (96.9%), the incidence of serious infections and other AEs was comparable between both groups, with no significant difference in febrile neutropenia (42.3% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.38). Overall, the AH cohort demonstrated a significantly lower hospital readmission rate after ramp-up (29.5% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.001). Moreover, the inpatient cohort’s admission days were longer than in the AH cohort (13 vs. 8, p = 0.28). Conclusions: AH management was feasible and safe, leading to better resource use, enhanced patient comfort, and improved treatment compliance. The potential of AH programs for managing low-intensity chemotherapy regimens can reduce hospital admissions and subsequently improve patient and caregiver well-being.