Vladimir Mégevand

Dr. Vladimir Mégevand


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Matteo ScampaMatteo Scampa
Matteo Scampa
VMVladimir Mégevand
Vladimir Mégevand
DSDomizio Suva
Domizio Suva
DKDaniel F. Kalbermatten
Daniel F. Kalbermatten
COCarlo Maria Oranges
Carlo Maria Oranges
Background: Free and pedicled flaps are both valuable surgical strategies for lower limb reconstruction. Evidence that compares both techniques is scarce. Our aim is to synthetise all the comparative studies by conducting a meta-analysis to identify post-operative outcomes. Method: A systematic review of pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and Web of Science was conducted, aiming at articles comparing the outcomes of free versus pedicled flaps in lower limb reconstruction. A pooled analysis with the Mantel and Haenszel methods and random effect analysis provided results as a risk ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Results: 10 retrospective studies were selected. While the flap necrosis rate did not differ significantly between techniques (RR 1.35, 95%CI 0.76–2.39, p = 0.31), the partial flap necrosis rate was significantly lower in free flaps (RR 0.45, 95%CI 0.22–0.91, p = 0.03). The overall complication rate (RR 0.83, 95%CI 0.64–1.07, p = 0.16) and revision surgery rate (RR 1.38, 95%CI 0.55–3.50, p = 0.49) did not differ significantly. No significant difference was found in the high aesthetic satisfaction rate (RR 1.76, 95%CI 0.57–5.41, p = 0.32) and post-operative infection rate (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.55–1.33, p = 0.48). Conclusion: Despite important variability in the choice of flaps and outcomes reported among studies, free and pedicled flaps appear to be reliable surgical strategies for lower limb reconstruction with similar surgical outcomes.

11 March 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VMVladimir Mégevand
Vladimir Mégevand
DSDomizio Suva
Domizio Suva
MMMorad Mohamad
Morad Mohamad
DHDidier Hannouche
Didier Hannouche
DKDaniel F. Kalbermatten
Daniel F. Kalbermatten
COCarlo Maria Oranges
Carlo Maria Oranges
(1) Background: Lower extremity microvascular reconstruction aims at restoring function and preventing infection while ensuring optimal cosmetic outcomes. Muscle (M) or fasciocutaneous (FC) free flaps are alternatively used to treat similar conditions. However, it is unclear whether one option might be considered superior in terms of clinical outcomes. We performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing M and FC flaps to evaluate this issue. (2) Methods: The PRISMA guidelines were followed to perform a systematic search of the English literature. We included all articles comparing M and FC flap reconstructions for lower limb soft tissue defects following trauma, infection, or tumor resection. We considered flap loss, postoperative infection, and donor site morbidity as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included minor recipient site complications and the need for revision surgery. (3) Results: A total of 10 articles involving 1340 patients receiving 1346 flaps were retrieved, corresponding to 782 M flaps and 564 FC flaps. The sizes of the studies ranged from 39 to 518 patients. We observed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in terms of donor site morbidity and total flap loss with better outcomes for FC free flaps. Moreover, the majority of authors preferred FC flaps because of the greater aesthetic satisfaction and lesser rates of postoperative infection. (4) Conclusion: Our data suggest that both M and FC free flaps are safe and effective options for lower limb reconstruction following trauma, infection, or tumor resection, although FC flaps tend to provide stronger clinical benefits. Further research should include larger randomized studies to confirm these data.

25 March 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
REriotto eleonora
riotto eleonora
VMVladimir Mégevand
Vladimir Mégevand
AMAlexis Mégevand
Alexis Mégevand
CMchristophe Marti
christophe Marti
JPJerome Pugin
Jerome Pugin
GMGordana Sunaric Mégevand
Gordana Sunaric Mégevand
The recent outbreak of the Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has been declared a worldwide pandemic. Within various multi-organ involvement, several ocular manifestations have been described, such as conjunctivitis and retinopathy. The prevalence and severity of retinal lesions and their relation to the severity of the systemic disease are unknown. We performed a prospective, observational study on 172 consecutively hospitalized patients with acute confirmed COVID-19 infection. All patients underwent screening widefield fundus photography at the time of hospital admission. Despite no ocular or vision-related symptoms, we found cotton wool spots (CWS) and/or hemorrhages in 19/172 patients (11%). Diabetes history, overweight, and elevated C-reactive protein were more frequently observed among patients with retinal abnormalities, while a history of systemic hypertension was more frequently observed among patients without retinal findings. At a 3-month follow-up visit, CWS had subsided in all patients.

11 May 2025 in JPRAS Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MFM.L. Foba
M.L. Foba
VMVladimir Mégevand
Vladimir Mégevand
Matteo ScampaMatteo Scampa
Matteo Scampa
ETE.H.D. Teuw
E.H.D. Teuw
PQP. Quinodoz
P. Quinodoz
DAD. André-Lévigne
D. André-Lévigne
Progressive hemifacial atrophy (PHA), including en-coup-de-sabre morphea and Parry-Romberg syndrome, is a rare condition characterized by unilateral atrophy of facial tissues. The etiology of PHA remains unclear, though it is generally considered to be an autoimmune disease. Current treatment approaches typically involve systemic immunosuppression to stabilize the disease, followed by reconstructive surgery to restore facial symmetry, ranging from complex flap reconstruction to autologous fat transfer (AFT) and allogenic fillers. Recent evidence supports AFT not only as a volumetric filler but also for its immunomodulatory and angiogenic properties, making it a promising supplement or even alternative to systemic immunosuppressive therapy. We present four cases of PHA treated with AFT in Dakar, Senegal, and Geneva, Switzerland. A comprehensive review of evidence supporting AFT as a cellular therapy in patients with PHA was performed discussing its potential as an effective stand-alone therapeutic option. There is growing evidence that AFT has regenerative effects in fibrotic autoimmune disease, including scleroderma and PHA. This is in line with our results showing not only improved facial contours and a restoration of symmetrical fullness but also improved overall tissue quality after AFT. We advocate AFT to be a safe and reliable therapy in PHA, offering not only a substitute to the lost tissue but also local immunomodulatory benefits useful for tissue regeneration. Besides the benefits of combining local immunomodulatory cell therapy with the reconstructive volume restoration, this technique offers a low risk profile, cost-effectiveness and excellent accessibility, particularly relevant in low-income settings.

25 February 2022 in Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VMVladimir Mégevand
Vladimir Mégevand
JLJon A Lutz
Jon A Lutz
GKGregor Kocher
Gregor Kocher
PDPhilippe Dumont
Philippe Dumont
We report the case of a female patient with an obstructing well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour in the apical segment of the completely atelectatic right lower lobe. Bronchoscopic debulking of the tumour lead to re-ventilation of the remaining lobe, allowing to perform a lung-sparing bronchoplastic resection of the affected segment by uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery.

1 March 2023 in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VMVladimir Mégevand
Vladimir Mégevand
MSMatteo Scampa
Matteo Scampa
MMMaleeha Mughal
Maleeha Mughal
PMPari-Naz Mohanna
Pari-Naz Mohanna
DKDaniel F. Kalbermatten
Daniel F. Kalbermatten
COCarlo M. Oranges
Carlo M. Oranges