(1) Background: Endoscopy and morphological imaging are the mainstay of the diagnostic work up of laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas (LSCCs), which can be integrated in a multidisciplinary discussion to obtain a shared pretreatment staging. (2) Methods: A retrospective evaluation of patients, managed at a tertiary university hospital in Italy and submitted to major laryngeal surgery, has been performed. Four different stagings have been defined and compared: epTN (based on endoscopy and physical ENT examination); radTN (based on CT scan); cTN (based on multidisciplinary integration of the two above); pTN based on pathology on surgical samples. Oncological outcomes have been assessed. (3) Results: Three-year relapse free and disease specific survival were 88% and 92.5%, respectively, without significant differences between partial surgeries (n = 13) and total laryngectomies (n = 32). As for the pretreatment staging, and in particular the T classification, the cTN has been revealed as more reliable than epTN and radTN alone in predicting the final pT (Cohen kappa coefficient: 0.7 for cT, 0.44 for radT, 0.32 for epT). In the partial surgery group, we did not record any positive margin nor local recurrence, with a 100% overall and disease-specific survival. (4) Conclusions: The multidisciplinary approach is fundamental in the definition of the primary lesion in LSCC, in particular in order to safely perform surgical preservation of laryngeal function, which is associated with a higher laryngectomy-free survival than irradiation but to a lower salvageability in case of recurrence.

Objectives: Facial paralysis is a devastating yet frequent complication of skull base surgery, significantly impacting quality of life through functional impairments and psychosocial consequences. Management is complex and requires an individualized approach based on duration of paralysis, etiology and extent of nerve injury, overall prognosis, and rehabilitative goals. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current strategies for managing post-skull base surgery facial paralysis. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was performed, analyzing surgical reanimation techniques (nerve grafting, nerve transfers, regional and free muscle transfers), static procedures for facial symmetry and ocular protection, and non-surgical interventions such as physical therapy, botulinum toxin injections, and psychological support. Key criteria guiding treatment selection, including muscle viability and timing since injury, were examined. Results: Dynamic surgical approaches remain central to restoring movement. Nerve grafting and transfers are effective when viable musculature is present, whereas regional or free muscle transfers are required in long-standing paralysis with irreversible atrophy. Static procedures provide adjunctive improvements in resting symmetry and eye protection. Non-surgical strategies, including rehabilitation therapy and botulinum toxin, enhance functional outcomes and reduce synkinesis. Psychological counseling addresses the profound emotional burden associated with facial disfigurement. Across modalities, individualized treatment planning is crucial. Conclusions: Management of facial paralysis after skull base surgery demands a multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach. Combining surgical and non-surgical interventions optimizes functional and aesthetic outcomes, helping restore both facial movement and psychosocial well-being.

Background/Objectives: High-dose-rate (HDR) interventional radiotherapy (IRT) represents a valuable treatment alternative for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the midface, especially in the presence of esthetic or functional issues related to surgery. This retrospective study examines the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent HDR-IRT at our institution. Methods: Patients (pts) with histologically confirmed midface BCC were treated with HDR-IRT using superficial, interstitial, or endocavitary implants depending on tumor characteristics. Fractionation regimens were tailored to tumor location: 45 Gy in 9 fractions twice a day (the cheeks/lips) and 44 Gy in 14 fractions (the nose, with the first and last fractions delivering 4 Gy each, administered once daily, and the remaining 12 fractions delivering 3 Gy each, administered twice daily (BID) with an inter-fraction interval of at least 6 h). Treatment efficacy was assessed based on local control rates, toxicity (CTCAE criteria), and cosmetic outcomes. Results: Eight patients were considered. The most common tumor site was the nose (seven patients, 87.5%), followed by the upper lip. Tumors were either primary (three patients, 37.5%) or residual/recurrent after previous surgery with involved margins (five patients, 62.5%). The median follow-up was 6 months (range: 1–19 months). Clinical local control was achieved in all cases, with persistent alteration at dermoscopy in one patient six months after the completion of treatment. Acute toxicities were minimal, with two patients developing grade 3 skin toxicity, which resolved within 1–3 months with topical management. Cosmetic outcomes were favorable across all patients. Conclusions: HDR-IRT is a well-tolerated, effective, and cosmetically favorable treatment for midface BCC. Our institutional experience supports its use as an alternative to surgery in cosmetically sensitive areas and in selected patients/lesions unfit for surgery. Endocavitary implants appear to be an effective option to cover the full thickness nasal wall without resorting to interstitial implants.