Avni Malhotra

Dr. Avni Malhotra


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 February 2023 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EFEtienne Fluet-Chouinard
Etienne Fluet-Chouinard
BSBenjamin D. Stocker
Benjamin D. Stocker
ZZZhen Zhang
Zhen Zhang
AMAvni Malhotra
Avni Malhotra
JMJoe R. Melton
Joe R. Melton
PMPeter B. McIntyre
Peter B. McIntyre

21 October 2019 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SNSusan M. Natali
Susan M. Natali
JWJennifer D. Watts
Jennifer D. Watts
BRBrendan M. Rogers
Brendan M. Rogers
SPStefano Potter
Stefano Potter
SLSarah M. Ludwig
Sarah M. Ludwig
DZDonatella Zona
Donatella Zona

31 August 2018 in Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMichael Loranty
Michael Loranty
Benjamin AbbottBenjamin Abbott
Benjamin Abbott
DBDaan Blok
Daan Blok
TDThomas Douglas
Thomas Douglas
HEHoward E. Epstein
Howard E. Epstein
DWDonald A. Walker
Donald A. Walker
Soils in Arctic and boreal ecosystems store twice as much carbon as the atmosphere, a portion of which may be released as high-latitude soils warm. Some of the uncertainty in the timing and magnitude of the permafrost–climate feedback stems from complex interactions between ecosystem properties and soil thermal dynamics. Terrestrial ecosystems fundamentally regulate the response of permafrost to climate change by influencing surface energy partitioning and the thermal properties of soil itself. Here we review how Arctic and boreal ecosystem processes influence thermal dynamics in permafrost soil and how these linkages may evolve in response to climate change. While many of the ecosystem characteristics and processes affecting soil thermal dynamics have been examined individually (e.g., vegetation, soil moisture, and soil structure), interactions among these processes are less understood. Changes in ecosystem type and vegetation characteristics will alter spatial patterns of interactions between climate and permafrost. In addition to shrub expansion, other vegetation responses to changes in climate and rapidly changing disturbance regimes will affect ecosystem surface energy partitioning in ways that are important for permafrost. Lastly, changes in vegetation and ecosystem distribution will lead to regional and global biophysical and biogeochemical climate feedbacks that may compound or offset local impacts on permafrost soils. Consequently, accurate prediction of the permafrost carbon climate feedback will require detailed understanding of changes in terrestrial ecosystem distribution and function, which depend on the net effects of multiple feedback processes operating across scales in space and time.

23 December 2021 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APAdam Pellegrini
Adam Pellegrini
JHJennifer Harden
Jennifer Harden
KGKaterina Georgiou
Katerina Georgiou
KHKyle Hemes
Kyle Hemes
AMAvni Malhotra
Avni Malhotra
RJRobert B. Jackson
Robert B. Jackson

29 July 2021 in Earth System Science Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KDKyle B. Delwiche
Kyle B. Delwiche
SKSara Helen Knox
Sara Helen Knox
AMAvni Malhotra
Avni Malhotra
EFEtienne Fluet-Chouinard
Etienne Fluet-Chouinard
GMGavin McNicol
Gavin McNicol
RJRobert B. Jackson
Robert B. Jackson
Methane (CH4) emissions from natural landscapes constitute roughly half of global CH4 contributions to the atmosphere, yet large uncertainties remain in the absolute magnitude and the seasonality of emission quantities and drivers. Eddy covariance (EC) measurements of CH4 flux are ideal for constraining ecosystem-scale CH4 emissions due to quasi-continuous and high-temporal-resolution CH4 flux measurements, coincident carbon dioxide, water, and energy flux measurements, lack of ecosystem disturbance, and increased availability of datasets over the last decade. Here, we (1) describe the newly published dataset, FLUXNET-CH4 Version 1.0, the first open-source global dataset of CH4 EC measurements (available at https://fluxnet.org/data/fluxnet-ch4-community-product/, last access: 7 April 2021). FLUXNET-CH4 includes half-hourly and daily gap-filled and non-gap-filled aggregated CH4 fluxes and meteorological data from 79 sites globally: 42 freshwater wetlands, 6 brackish and saline wetlands, 7 formerly drained ecosystems, 7 rice paddy sites, 2 lakes, and 15 uplands. Then, we (2) evaluate FLUXNET-CH4 representativeness for freshwater wetland coverage globally because the majority of sites in FLUXNET-CH4 Version 1.0 are freshwater wetlands which are a substantial source of total atmospheric CH4 emissions; and (3) we provide the first global estimates of the seasonal variability and seasonality predictors of freshwater wetland CH4 fluxes. Our representativeness analysis suggests that the freshwater wetland sites in the dataset cover global wetland bioclimatic attributes (encompassing energy, moisture, and vegetation-related parameters) in arctic, boreal, and temperate regions but only sparsely cover humid tropical regions. Seasonality metrics of wetland CH4 emissions vary considerably across latitudinal bands. In freshwater wetlands (except those between 20∘ S to 20∘ N) the spring onset of elevated CH4 emissions starts 3 d earlier, and the CH4 emission season lasts 4 d longer, for each degree Celsius increase in mean annual air temperature. On average, the spring onset of increasing CH4 emissions lags behind soil warming by 1 month, with very few sites experiencing increased CH4 emissions prior to the onset of soil warming. In contrast, roughly half of these sites experience the spring onset of rising CH4 emissions prior to the spring increase in gross primary productivity (GPP). The timing of peak summer CH4 emissions does not correlate with the timing for either peak summer temperature or peak GPP. Our results provide seasonality parameters for CH4 modeling and highlight seasonality metrics that cannot be predicted by temperature or GPP (i.e., seasonality of CH4 peak). FLUXNET-CH4 is a powerful new resource for diagnosing and understanding the role of terrestrial ecosystems and climate drivers in the global CH4 cycle, and future additions of sites in tropical ecosystems and site years of data collection will provide added value to this database. All seasonality parameters are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4672601 (Delwiche et al., 2021). Additionally, raw FLUXNET-CH4 data used to extract seasonality parameters can be downloaded from https://fluxnet.org/data/fluxnet-ch4-community-product/ (last access: 7 April 2021), and a complete list of the 79 individual site data DOIs is provided in Table 2 of this paper.

29 April 2021 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SKSara Helen Knox
Sara Helen Knox
SBSheel Bansal
Sheel Bansal
GMGavin McNicol
Gavin McNicol
KSKarina Schafer
Karina Schafer
CSCove Sturtevant
Cove Sturtevant
RJRobert B. Jackson
Robert B. Jackson