Kazimierz Jan Strzalka

Dr. Kazimierz Jan Strzalka

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2018 in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Maria MalevaMaria Maleva
Maria Maleva
Elena V. GarmashElena V. Garmash
Elena V. Garmash
NCNadezhda Chukina
Nadezhda Chukina
Przemysław MalecPrzemysław Malec
Przemysław Malec
AWAndrzej Waloszek
Andrzej Waloszek
KSKazimierz Jan Strzalka
Kazimierz Jan Strzalka

1 January 2006 in Russian Journal of Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAMARENDRA NARAYAN MISRA
AMARENDRA NARAYAN MISRA
DLD. Latowski
D. Latowski
KSKazimierz Jan Strzalka
Kazimierz Jan Strzalka
Seven-day-old kidney bean and cabbage seedlings were treated with 0.1–0.3 M NaCl solutions for 3 days. Chlorophyll content decreased in NaCl-treated Phaseolus seedlings, but did not significantly decrease in Brassica seedlings. Photochemical efficiency of photosystem II at dark-adapted state was similar in both Phaseolus and Brassica. The de-epoxidation state of violaxanthin increased more than sixfold in Phaseolus but showed no significant change in Brassica seedlings during NaCl treatment under low light. Maximum de-epoxidation state of violaxanthin in vivo tested in high light (2000 μmol quanta/(m2 s) increased in salt-stressed Phaseolus but decreased in Brassica seedlings. The nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) also increased in Phaseolus but decreased in Brassica. This suggests that xanthophyll cycle pigments influence the NPQ in both Phaseolus and Brassica, but in an opposite way. The increase in the de-epoxidation state of violaxanthin in salt-stressed Phaseolus even under low light may be considered an early light signal to protect the pigment-protein complexes from salt-stress induced photodamage. It is proposed that in salt-stressed Brassica, the de-epoxidation is retarded and/or the epoxidation is accelerated leading to the accumulation of violaxanthin and a lower de-epoxidation state. Thus, light-induced violoxanthin cycle operation largely controls the photoprotection of photosynthetic apparatus in kidney bean leaves.


1 August 2019 in Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ISIreneusz Slesak
Ireneusz Slesak
MKMonika Kula-Maximenko
Monika Kula-Maximenko
HŚHalina Ślesak
Halina Ślesak
ZMZbigniew Miszalski
Zbigniew Miszalski
KSKazimierz Jan Strzalka
Kazimierz Jan Strzalka

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BNBeatrycze Nowicka
Beatrycze Nowicka
ATAgnieszka Trela-Makowej
Agnieszka Trela-Makowej
Dariusz LatowskiDariusz Latowski
Dariusz Latowski
KSKazimierz Jan Strzalka
Kazimierz Jan Strzalka
RSRenata Szymańska
Renata Szymańska
Plant prenyllipids, especially isoprenoid chromanols and quinols, are very efficient low-molecular-weight lipophilic antioxidants, protecting membranes and storage lipids from reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS are byproducts of aerobic metabolism that can damage cell components, they are also known to play a role in signaling. Plants are particularly prone to oxidative damage because oxygenic photosynthesis results in O2 formation in their green tissues. In addition, the photosynthetic electron transfer chain is an important source of ROS. Therefore, chloroplasts are the main site of ROS generation in plant cells during the light reactions of photosynthesis, and plastidic antioxidants are crucial to prevent oxidative stress, which occurs when plants are exposed to various types of stress factors, both biotic and abiotic. The increase in antioxidant content during stress acclimation is a common phenomenon. In the present review, we describe the mechanisms of ROS (singlet oxygen, superoxide, hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radical) production in chloroplasts in general and during exposure to abiotic stress factors, such as high light, low temperature, drought and salinity. We highlight the dual role of their presence: negative (i.e., lipid peroxidation, pigment and protein oxidation) and positive (i.e., contribution in redox-based physiological processes). Then we provide a summary of current knowledge concerning plastidic prenyllipid antioxidants belonging to isoprenoid chromanols and quinols, as well as their structure, occurrence, biosynthesis and function both in ROS detoxification and signaling.

28 September 2023 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ABArpan Kumar Basak
Arpan Kumar Basak
Anna PiaseckaAnna Piasecka
Anna Piasecka
JHJana Hucklenbroich
Jana Hucklenbroich
GTGözde Merve Türksoy
Gözde Merve Türksoy
RGRui Guan
Rui Guan
RNRyohei Thomas Nakano
Ryohei Thomas Nakano
Summary: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) bodies are ER‐derived structures that contain a large amount of PYK10 myrosinase, which hydrolyzes tryptophan (Trp)‐derived indole glucosinolates (IGs). Given the well‐described role of IGs in root–microbe interactions, we hypothesized that ER bodies in roots are important for interaction with soil‐borne microbes at the root–soil interface. We used mutants impaired in ER bodies ( nai1 ), ER body‐resident myrosinases ( pyk10bglu21 ), IG biosynthesis ( myb34/51/122 ), and Trp specialized metabolism ( cyp79b2b3 ) to profile their root microbiota community in natural soil, evaluate the impact of axenically collected root exudates on soil or synthetic microbial communities, and test their response to fungal endophytes in a mono‐association setup. Tested mutants exhibited altered bacterial and fungal communities in rhizoplane and endosphere, respectively. Natural soils and bacterial synthetic communities treated with mutant root exudates exhibited distinctive microbial profiles from those treated with wild‐type (WT) exudates. Most tested endophytes severely restricted the growth of cyp79b2b3 , a part of which also impaired the growth of pyk10bglu21 . Our results suggest that root ER bodies and their resident myrosinases modulate the profile of root‐secreted metabolites and thereby influence root–microbiota interactions.