Suna Ekin Kali

Mrs. Suna Ekin Kali

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 December 2024 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SKSuna Ekin Kali
Suna Ekin Kali
HÖHeléne Österlund
Heléne Österlund
Maria ViklanderMaria Viklander
Maria Viklander
GBGodecke-Tobias Blecken
Godecke-Tobias Blecken
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are extensively used in urban environments and are, thus, found in urban stormwater. However, the relevance of stormwater as a pathway for PFAS to urban streams is largely unknown. This study evaluated the impact of urban stormwater runoff on PFAS concentrations and spatial distribution in three urban streams affected by stormwater discharges from separate sewer systems. River water was sampled during dry (DW) and wet weather (WW) upstream, immediately downstream, and further downstream of three urbanized areas with separate sewer systems and with and without point sources (i.e. waste water treatment plant, airports). Water samples were analyzed for 34 targeted PFAS compounds and sediment samples for 35 targeted PFAS and 30 PFAS compounds using a total oxidizable precursor assay. The sum of the quantified PFAS concentrations ranged from the reporting limit (RL) to 84.7 ng/L during DW and increased as the streams were affected by WW discharges (0.87 to 102.3 ng/L). The highest PFAS concentrations were found downstream of urban areas and/or point sources (i.e. airports) during WW, indicating a clear contribution from stormwater discharges. A consistent PFAS contribution from the WWTP was observed under both DW and WW conditions. During WW events, concentrations of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and total PFAS (PFOA equivalents) exceeded the annual average environmental quality standards, which are an established limit of 0.65 ng/L for PFOS and a proposed limit of 4.4 ng/L for total PFAS. Notably, except for the legacy PFAS, PFOS and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), the most frequently quantified PFAS during DW were short-chain. For WW, long-chain perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs) and a precursor, 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonic acid (6:2 FTS), were more frequently quantified, suggesting stormwater is a source of these longer-chain and particle-associated PFAS. The detection of unregulated fluorotelomer sulfonates (FTSs) such as 6:2 and 8:2 FTS during WW suggests a need for regulatory action, as these compounds can degrade into more stable PFAS. In sediment, higher concentrations, and a greater variety of PFAS were found at sites with known point sources i.e. airports. Long-chain PFCAs (C7-C13), perfluoroalkyl sulfonates (PFSAs) (C6), and precursors (i.e. N-Ethyl perfluorooctane sulfonamidoacetic acid), were more prevalent in sediments than in the water. Notably, PFOS concentrations in sediment exceeded the lowest Predicted No-Effect Concentration (PNEC) across sites, posing a potential long-term environmental risk, though current PNECs for other PFAS may underestimate such risks. The findings of the study highlight urban stormwater as a source of PFAS to urban streams indicating the need to minimize PFAS sources in the urban environment and to effectively treat stormwater to protect receiving water bodies.

16 May 2025 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SKSuna Ekin Kali
Suna Ekin Kali
HÖH. Österlund
H. Österlund
Maria ViklanderMaria Viklander
Maria Viklander
GBG. Blecken
G. Blecken
Stormwater runoff transports organic contaminants from urban areas to receiving water bodies, yet its contribution to these pollutants in the aquatic environment is still poorly understood. Additionally, contaminants behave differently in receiving waters, with some binding to particles and accumulating in sediments while others stay dissolved in the water. This study was carried out three Swedish urban streams receiving stormwater discharges through separate sewer systems, under dry and wet weather conditions. Stream water and bottom sediment samples were collected along an urbanization gradient, from rural upstream to urban downstream sections, and analyzed for 50 stormwater-related organic contaminants to assess the impact of stormwater on contaminant levels. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and phthalates were more prevalent in sediment samples, with concentrations increasing along the urbanization gradient, indicating contributions from urban areas and stormwater runoff. In contrast, organotin compounds and phenols showed no clear pattern indicating transport through stormwater runoff in the water phase. Per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) behaved differently from other contaminant groups by exhibiting a clear contribution from stormwater runoff in both phases. Though carried out in streams passing through relatively small urban settings, the findings clearly demonstrate that stormwater discharges can impact receiving waters. Of the 50 analyzed contaminants, three exceeded toxicity-based limits in dry weather (DW), seven in wet weather (WW), and twenty in bottom sediments. In the water phase, under DW and WW conditions, the three contaminants with the highest exceedance of toxicity-based limits were Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), Tributyltin (TBT), and 4-nonylphenol (4-NP). In the sediment phase, 4‑tert-octylphenol (4-t-OP), Tributyltin (TBT), and di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) were the three compounds with the highest exceedance of toxicity-based limits. Compared to relatively hydrophilic contaminants (e.g., PFAS), hydrophobic organic contaminants, particularly those accumulating in sediments (e.g. phenols, phthalates), posed a greater risk to the aquatic environment with exceedance levels reaching up to 105 times the thresholds. These findings raise concerns about the long-term impact on aquatic environments and highlight the need for mitigation strategies, including regulatory or operational restrictions on the contaminant sources and implementation of stormwater treatment facilities.

8 April 2025 in Blue-Green Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KUKateryna Utkina
Kateryna Utkina
Richard M. AshleyRichard M. Ashley
Richard M. Ashley
ZSZhengdong Sun
Zhengdong Sun
UAUtsav Adhikari
Utsav Adhikari
SKSuna Ekin Kali
Suna Ekin Kali
GBGodecke-Tobias Blecken
Godecke-Tobias Blecken
Blue-green infrastructure (BGI) options are considered to be more sustainable practices for water management and bring a range of benefits over and above water management. Davidshall in Malmö, Sweden, has been used as a case area to assess the multiple benefits of implementing BGI, considering seven alternative BGI schemes systematically developed along two scales: naturalness (i.e. more/less engineered/complex) and spatial distribution (e.g. decentral vs. end-of-pipe). The baseline alternative was the existing situation. The Benefit Estimation Tool (B£ST) was used to carry out a socio-economic assessment. The overall benefits varied significantly (two orders of magnitude), depending on the BGI scheme implemented: the greatest values were associated with natural decentral, natural decentral/end-of-pipe, and engineered decentral/end-of-pipe alternatives, those including sub-surface and open dry detention, stormwater tree pits, and rain gardens. The three B£ST categories providing the greatest benefits were enhancing amenity, benefiting health, and reducing flooding. Cultural ecosystem services were provided by all alternatives, and two alternatives (natural decentral and natural decentral/end-of-pipe) also provided regulating ecosystem services. The study showed that amenity and health were the most significant benefits of BGI implementation, contrasting with the main aim of BGI implementation, which was stormwater management (water quality and flood protection).

20 October 2023 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSuna Ekin Kali
Suna Ekin Kali
AAAchira Amur
Achira Amur
LCLena Champlin
Lena Champlin
Mira OlsonMira Olson
Mira Olson
Patrick Lee GurianPatrick Lee Gurian
Patrick Lee Gurian
The Schuylkill River Watershed in southeastern PA provides essential ecosystem services, including drinking water, power generation, recreation, transportation, irrigation, and habitats for aquatic life. The impact of changing climate and land use on these resources could negatively affect the ability of the watershed to continually provide these services. This study applies a hydrologic model to assess the impact of climate and land use change on water resources in the Schuylkill River Basin. A hydrologic model was created within the Structural Thinking Experiential Learning Laboratory with Animation (STELLA) modeling environment. Downscaled future climate change scenarios were generated using Localized Constructed Analogs (LOCA) from 2020 to 2040 for Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) 4.5 and RCP 8.5 emission scenarios. Three regional land use change scenarios were developed based on historical land use and land cover change trends. The calibrated model was then run under projected climate and land use scenarios to simulate daily streamflow, reservoir water levels, and investigate the availability of water resources in the basin. Historically, the streamflow objective for the Schuylkill was met 89.8% of the time. However, the model forecasts that this will drop to 67.2–76.9% of the time, depending on the climate models used. Streamflow forecasts varied little with changes in land use. The two greenhouse gas emission scenarios considered (high and medium emissions) also produced similar predictions for the frequency with which the streamflow target is met. Barring substantial changes in global greenhouse gas emissions, the region should prepare for substantially greater frequency of low flow conditions in the Schuylkill River.