Alexandra Derevianko

Alexandra Derevianko

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 January 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAlexandra Derevianko
Alexandra Derevianko
SPSilvia Francesca Maria Pizzoli
Silvia Francesca Maria Pizzoli
Filippo PesapaneFilippo Pesapane
Filippo Pesapane
Anna RotiliAnna Rotili
Anna Rotili
DMDario Monzani
Dario Monzani
Gabriella PravettoniGabriella Pravettoni
Gabriella Pravettoni
Background: In the past decade, interest in applying Artificial Intelligence (AI) in radiology to improve diagnostic procedures increased. AI has potential benefits spanning all steps of the imaging chain, from the prescription of diagnostic tests to the communication of test reports. The use of AI in the field of radiology also poses challenges in doctor–patient communication at the time of the diagnosis. This systematic review focuses on the patient role and the interpersonal skills between patients and physicians when AI is implemented in cancer diagnosis communication. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and PsycNet from 1990 to 2021. The search terms were: (“artificial intelligence” or “intelligence machine”) and “communication” “radiology” and “oncology diagnosis”. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Results: 517 records were identified, and 5 papers met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Most of the articles emphasized the success of the technological support of AI in radiology at the expense of patient trust in AI and patient-centered communication in cancer disease. Practical implications and future guidelines were discussed according to the results. Conclusions: AI has proven to be beneficial in helping clinicians with diagnosis. Future research may improve patients’ trust through adequate information about the advantageous use of AI and an increase in medical compliance with adequate training on doctor–patient diagnosis communication.

19 October 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMaria Monica Ratti
Maria Monica Ratti
GGGiorgio Gandaglia
Giorgio Gandaglia
ESElena Silvia Sisca
Elena Silvia Sisca
ADAlexandra Derevianko
Alexandra Derevianko
EAEugenia Alleva
Eugenia Alleva
ABAlberto Briganti
Alberto Briganti
Introduction: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) represent important endpoints in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). However, the clinically valid and accurate measurement of health-related quality of life depends on the psychometric properties of the PROMs considered. Objective: To appraise, compare, and summarize the properties of PROMs in mPCa. Evidence acquisition: We performed a review of PROMs used in RCTs, including patients with mPCa, using Medline in September 2021, according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. This systematic review is part of PIONEER (an IMI2 European network of excellence for big data in PCa). Results: The most frequently used PROMs in RCTs of patients with mPCa were the Functional Assessment for Cancer Therapy—Prostate (FACT-P) (n = 18), the Brief Pain Inventory—Short Form (BPI-SF) (n = 8), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) (n = 6). A total of 283 abstracts were screened and 12 full-text studies were evaluated. A total of two, one, and two studies reported the psychometric proprieties of FACT-P, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and BPI-SF, respectively. FACT-P and BPI showed a high content validity, while BPI-SF showed a moderate content validity. FACT-P and BPI showed a high internal consistency (summarized by Cronbach’s α 0.70–0.95). Conclusions: The use of BPI and FACT-P in mPCa patients is supported by their high content validity and internal consistency. Since BPI is focused on pain assessment, we recommend FACT-P, which provides a broader assessment of QoL and wellbeing, for the clinical evaluation of mPCa patients. However, these considerations have been elaborated on in a very limited number of studies. Patient summary: In this paper, we review the psychometric properties of PROMs used with patients with mPCa to find the questionnaires that best assess patients’ QoL, in order to help professionals in their intervention and improve patients’ QoL. We recommend the use of BPI and FACT-P for their high content validity and internal consistency despite the limited number of studies considered.

1 March 2023 in Future Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMCharlotte L Moss
Charlotte L Moss
TGTeresa Guerrero-Urbano
Teresa Guerrero-Urbano
IWIngrid White
Ingrid White
BTBenjamin Taylor
Benjamin Taylor
RKRebecca Kristeleit
Rebecca Kristeleit
MHMieke Van Hemelrijck
Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Purpose: To provide perspective on patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) instruments to adopt in patients diagnosed with gynecological cancers. Methods: A systematic search was conducted to i... Plain language summary Gynecological cancers are cancers which occur in the reproductive system of women. The cervical cancer screening program and development of new treatments mean that women wit...

1 June 2021 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRM.M. Ratti
M.M. Ratti
GGGiorgio Gandaglia
Giorgio Gandaglia
LLL. Leardini
L. Leardini
SFS. Mazzoleni Ferracini
S. Mazzoleni Ferracini
ESE.S. Sisca
E.S. Sisca
ABA. Briganti
A. Briganti