Marcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato

Prof. Dr. Marcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2014 in International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMarcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato
Marcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato
DSD.M. dos Santos
D.M. dos Santos
JJJOEL FERREIRA SANTIAGO JUNIOR
JOEL FERREIRA SANTIAGO JUNIOR
AMA. Moreno
A. Moreno
EPEduardo Piza Pellizzer
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer

1 February 2009 in Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMarcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato
Marcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato
APAldiéris Alves Pesqueira
Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira
CSCristina Ramos da Silva
Cristina Ramos da Silva
HFHumberto Gennari Filho
Humberto Gennari Filho
DSDaniela Micheline dos Santos
Daniela Micheline dos Santos

1 April 2011 in The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAnderson Catelan
Anderson Catelan
ABAndre Luiz Fraga Briso
Andre Luiz Fraga Briso
RSRenato Hermann Sundfeld
Renato Hermann Sundfeld
MGMarcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato
Marcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato
PSPaulo Henrique Dos Santos
Paulo Henrique Dos Santos

1 June 2014 in International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMarcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato
Marcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato
EPEduardo Piza Pellizzer
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
AMA. Moreno
A. Moreno
HGH. Gennari-Filho
H. Gennari-Filho
DSD.M. dos Santos
D.M. dos Santos
ESEmerson Santos
Emerson Santos

1 April 2014 in Journal of Oral Implantology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAldiéris Alves Pesqueira
Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira
MGMarcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato
Marcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato
HFHumberto Gennari Filho
Humberto Gennari Filho
DMDouglas Monteiro
Douglas Monteiro
DSDaniela Micheline dos Santos
Daniela Micheline dos Santos
EPEduardo Piza Pellizzer
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
Because the biomechanical behavior of dental implants is different from that of natural tooth, clinical problems may occur. The mechanism of stress distribution and load transfer to the implant/bone interface is a critical issue affecting the success rate of implants. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a brief literature review of the available stress analysis methods to study implant-supported prosthesis loading and to discuss their contributions in the biomechanical evaluation of oral rehabilitation with implants. Several studies have used experimental, analytical, and computational models by means of finite element models (FEM), photoelasticity, strain gauges and associations of these methods to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of dental implants. The FEM has been used to evaluate new components, configurations, materials, and shapes of implants. The greatest advantage of the photoelastic method is the ability to visualize the stresses in complex structures, such as oral structures, and to observe the stress patterns in the whole model, allowing the researcher to localize and quantify the stress magnitude. Strain gauges can be used to assess in vivo and in vitro stress in prostheses, implants, and teeth. Some authors use the strain gauge technique with photoelasticity or FEM techniques. These methodologies can be widely applied in dentistry, mainly in the research field. Therefore, they can guide further research and clinical studies by predicting some disadvantages and streamlining clinical time.

15 September 2015 in Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MGMarcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato
Marcelo Coelho Coelho Goiato
EFEmily Freitas
Emily Freitas
DSDaniela dos Santos
Daniela dos Santos
RMRodrigo de Medeiros
Rodrigo de Medeiros
MSMariana Sonego
Mariana Sonego
Acrylic resin is a widely used material in clinical practice, and a satisfactory biocompatibility is essential. When the resin polymerization reaction is incomplete, residual monomers are released into the oral cavity. The aim of this study was to evaluate, through a literature review, the cytotoxicity caused by the denture base acrylic resin used, and its components. The selection of published studies was performed on the Pubmed database from January 2008 to July 2013. The keywords used were: "cytotoxicity and acrylic resins", "cytotoxicity and denture base resins" and "cytotoxicity and oral prosthesis". Inclusion criteria were: in vitro studies and literature reviews published in English that evaluated the acrylic resin cytotoxicity for denture base and its components. Studies with no reference to the search strategy were excluded. A total of 182 articles were found. Among these, only 13 were included for writing this review. The MTT test is the most common test used to evaluate acrylic resin cytotoxicity. Auto-polymerized resin is more cytotoxic than heat-polymerized resin because of its higher quantity of residual monomers which cause cell and tissue changes in the oral mucosa. However, more studies are necessary for the development of biocompatible materials.