Quang Trung Tran

Dr. Quang Trung Tran


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 April 2022 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NANguyen S. An
Nguyen S. An
PLPhan N. Lan
Phan N. Lan
DHDao V. Hang
Dao V. Hang
DLDao V. Long
Dao V. Long
QTQuang Trung Tran
Quang Trung Tran
DSDinh V. Sang
Dinh V. Sang
In recent years, computer-aided automatic polyp segmentation and neoplasm detection have been an emerging topic in medical image analysis, providing valuable support to colonoscopy procedures. Attentions have been paid to improving the accuracy of polyp detection and segmentation. However, not much focus has been given to latency and throughput for performing these tasks on dedicated devices, which can be crucial for practical applications. This paper introduces a novel deep neural network architecture called BlazeNeo, for the task of polyp segmentation and neoplasm detection with an emphasis on compactness and speed while maintaining high accuracy. The model leverages the highly efficient HarDNet backbone alongside lightweight Receptive Field Blocks and a feature aggregation mechanism for computational efficiency. An auxiliary training strategy is proposed to take full advantage of the training data for the segmentation quality. Our experiments on a challenging dataset show that BlazeNeo achieves improvements in latency and model size while maintaining comparable accuracy against state-of-the-art methods. We obtain over 155 fps while outperforming all compared models in terms of accuracy in INT8 precision when deploying on a dedicated edge device with a conventional configuration.

1 September 2020 in Arab Journal of Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMohamed Alboraie
Mohamed Alboraie
APAlejandro Piscoya
Alejandro Piscoya
QTQuang Trung Tran
Quang Trung Tran
RMRobin B. Mendelsohn
Robin B. Mendelsohn
ABAmna Subhan Butt
Amna Subhan Butt
SVShivakumar Vignesh
Shivakumar Vignesh

1 January 2021 in Pancreas
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
QTQuang Trung Tran
Quang Trung Tran
VTVan Huy Tran
Van Huy Tran
MSMatthias Sendler
Matthias Sendler
JDJulia Doller
Julia Doller
Mats L. WieseMats L. Wiese
Mats L. Wiese
AAAli A. Aghdassi
Ali A. Aghdassi
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the most common gastroenterological disorders leading to hospitalization. It has long been debated whether biliary AP, about 30% to 50% of all cases, is induced by bile acids (BAs) when they reach the pancreas via reflux or via the systemic blood circulation. Besides their classical function in digestion, BAs have become an attractive research target because of their recently discovered property as signaling molecules. The underlying mechanisms of BAs have been investigated in various studies. Bile acids are internalized into acinar cells through specific G-protein–coupled BA receptor 1 and various transporters. They can further act via different receptors: the farnesoid X, ryanodine, and inositol triphosphate receptor. Bile acids induce a sustained Ca2+ influx from the endoplasmic reticulum and release of Ca2+ from acidic stores into the cytosol of acinar cells. The overload of intracellular Ca2+ results in mitochondrial depolarization and subsequent acinar cell necrosis. In addition, BAs have a biphasic effect on pancreatic ductal cells. A more detailed characterization of the mechanisms through which BAs contribute to the disease pathogenesis and severity will greatly improve our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and may allow for the development of therapeutic and preventive strategies for gallstone-inducedAP.

1 December 2023 in Advanced Functional Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QTQuang Trung Tran
Quang Trung Tran
ABAtanu Bag
Atanu Bag
LHLai Thi Ngoc Huyen
Lai Thi Ngoc Huyen
MMMontri Meeseepong
Montri Meeseepong
NLNaeeung Lee
Naeeung Lee

30 August 2020 in Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mats L. WieseMats L. Wiese
Mats L. Wiese
SGSimone Gärtner
Simone Gärtner
JDJulia Doller
Julia Doller
QTQuang Trung Tran
Quang Trung Tran
FFFabian Frost
Fabian Frost
AAAli A Aghdassi
Ali A Aghdassi
Background and Aim: Malnutrition is a frequent complication of chronic pancreatitis. Adequate nutritional support is imperative, but there is still uncertainty about the optimal nutritional treatment. This work systematically compiles evidence from randomized controlled trials investigating dietary interventions in chronic pancreatitis and, in a further step, contrasts those findings with existing dietary recommendations.Methods: The literature search (PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) included English and German full‐text articles, which had been published in peer‐reviewed journals. Two independent reviewers identified and selected studies. For meta‐analysis, forest plots with 95% confidence intervals were generated using a random‐effects model.Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials fulfilled all selection criteria. In these trials, the following dietary interventions were tested: antioxidant treatment (n = 6), vitamin D supplementation (n = 3), supplementation with oral nutritional supplements (n = 1), and symbiotics supplementation (n = 1). Studies were of good methodological quality (mean Jadad score of 3.6) but heterogeneous in terms of interventions and study populations. Only for vitamin D, there was convincing evidence for efficacy of supplementation. We found no effect for antioxidant treatment on pain relief (standardized mean difference = −0.12; 95% confidence interval −0.73 to 0.48) and limited generalizability for interventions with oral nutritional supplements and symbiotics.Conclusions: Nutritional management in chronic pancreatitis remains challenging. As well‐designed randomized controlled trials are scarce, in large part, recommendations can only be based on low‐level evidence studies or expert opinion. For now, consumption of a balanced diet remains the cornerstone recommendation for prevention, whereas more goal‐directed interventions are indicated for specific nutrient deficiencies.

26 August 2023 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QTQuang Trung Tran
Quang Trung Tran
NTNguyen Duy Thinh
Nguyen Duy Thinh
BNBao Song Nguyen-Tran
Bao Song Nguyen-Tran
Tung Nguyen-ThanhTung Nguyen-Thanh
Tung Nguyen-Thanh
QNQuy Tran Ngo
Quy Tran Ngo
TDThuan Dang-Cong
Thuan Dang-Cong
Background: Extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is more prevalent in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract than in other sites. This study aimed to determine the endoscopic characteristics of primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Methods: We investigated 140 patients from three tertiary referral hospitals with primary malignant lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Characteristics of the lesions were evaluated and analyzed using image-enhanced endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and histopathology. Results: The median age was 60.5 (range: 11–99), and 59 (42.1%) were female. The most frequent complaint was abdominal pain (74.3%), followed by bloody feces (10%) and diarrhea (2.9%). B symptoms were observed in 15 (10.7%) patients. GI obstruction was the most common complication (10.0%), followed by hemorrhage (7.9%) and perforation (1.5%). Regarding endoscopic findings, the identified sites were the following: the stomach (61.4%), colon (10%), small intestine (10%), ileocecum (8.6%), rectum (6.4%), and duodenum (3.6%). Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma are most prevalent in the stomach. Helicobacter pylori was identified in 46 cases (39.0%), with MALT lymphoma being the most infected subtype. Nearly all gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin lymphomas manifested as superficial type (25–59.6%) and ulcer type (15.6–50%) under endoscopy. We found that fungating type and protruding with ulcer type were more frequent types of aggressive lymphomas (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and T-cell lymphoma) compared to the indolent types (MALT lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, duodenal-type follicular lymphoma, and small lymphocytic lymphoma) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study showed that most subtypes of gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin lymphomas exhibited same endoscopic features (superficial type and ulcer type). Aggressive gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin lymphomas (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and T-cell lymphoma) were highly suspected when fungating lesions and protruding with ulcer lesions were encountered under endoscopy. Endoscopists should be aware of the connection between enhanced endoscopic characteristics and histological varieties of gastrointestinal lymphoma to improve diagnosis.