Uwe Hübner

Dr. Uwe Hübner

Technical Universit of Munich
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2018 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDavid B. Miklos
David B. Miklos
CRChristian Remy
Christian Remy
MJMartin Jekel
Martin Jekel
KLKarl Linden
Karl Linden
JDJörg E. Drewes
Jörg E. Drewes
Uwe HübnerUwe Hübner
Uwe Hübner

28 April 2024 in Heliyon
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Uwe HübnerUwe Hübner
Uwe Hübner
SSStephanie Spahr
Stephanie Spahr
HLHolger Lutze
Holger Lutze
AWArne Wieland
Arne Wieland
SRSteffen Rüting
Steffen Rüting
Jannis WenkJannis Wenk
Jannis Wenk
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are a growing research field with a large variety of different process variants and materials being tested at laboratory scale. However, despite extensive research in recent years and decades, many variants have not been transitioned to pilot- and full-scale operation. One major concern are the inconsistent experimental approaches applied across different studies that impede identification, comparison, and upscaling of the most promising AOPs. The aim of this tutorial review is to streamline future studies on the development of new solutions and materials for advanced oxidation by providing guidance for comparable and scalable oxidation experiments. We discuss recent developments in catalytic, ozone-based, radiation-driven, and other AOPs, and outline future perspectives and research needs. Since standardized experimental procedures are not available for most AOPs, we propose basic rules and key parameters for lab-scale evaluation of new AOPs including selection of suitable probe compounds and scavengers for the measurement of (major) reactive species. A two-phase approach to assess new AOP concepts is proposed, consisting of (i) basic research and proof-of-concept (technology readiness levels (TRL) 1–3), followed by (ii) process development in the intended water matrix including a cost comparison with an established process, applying comparable and scalable parameters such as UV fluence or ozone consumption (TRL 3–5). Subsequent demonstration of the new process (TRL 6–7) is briefly discussed, too. Finally, we highlight important research tools for a thorough mechanistic process evaluation and risk assessment including screening for transformation products that should be based on chemical logic and combined with complementary tools (mass balance, chemical calculations).

1 October 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CHC.X. Hiller
C.X. Hiller
Uwe HübnerUwe Hübner
Uwe Hübner
SFS. Fajnorova
S. Fajnorova
TST. Schwartz
T. Schwartz
JDJörg E. Drewes
Jörg E. Drewes

1 January 2015 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Uwe HübnerUwe Hübner
Uwe Hübner
UGUrs von Gunten
Urs von Gunten
MJMartin Jekel
Martin Jekel

1 November 2018 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMaolida Nihemaiti
Maolida Nihemaiti
DMDavid B. Miklos
David B. Miklos
Uwe HübnerUwe Hübner
Uwe Hübner
KLKarl Linden
Karl Linden
JDJörg E. Drewes
Jörg E. Drewes
JCJean-Philippe Croué
Jean-Philippe Croué

1 April 2019 in Chemical Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMD.B. Miklos
D.B. Miklos
WWW.-L. Wang
W.-L. Wang
KLKarl Linden
Karl Linden
JDJ.E. Drewes
J.E. Drewes
Uwe HübnerUwe Hübner
Uwe Hübner