Charlene Treanor

Dr. Charlene Treanor


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 September 2017 in Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CTCharlene Treanor
Charlene Treanor
TKT. Kyaw
T. Kyaw
MDM. Donnelly
M. Donnelly
The purpose of the study is to systematically review and synthesise randomised controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of prehabilitation compared to usual care for newly diagnosed, adult-onset cancer patients.

20 August 2014 in Quality of Life Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CTCharlene Treanor
Charlene Treanor
MDMichael Donnelly
Michael Donnelly

17 June 2019 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CTCharlene Treanor
Charlene Treanor
OSOlinda Santin
Olinda Santin
GPGillian Prue
Gillian Prue
HCHelen Coleman
Helen Coleman
CCChris R Cardwell
Chris R Cardwell
MDMichael Donnelly
Michael Donnelly

16 August 2016 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CTCharlene Treanor
Charlene Treanor
UMUna C McMenamin
Una C McMenamin
RORoisin F O'NEill
Roisin F O'NEill
CCChris R Cardwell
Chris R Cardwell
MCMike J Clarke
Mike J Clarke
MDMichael Donnelly
Michael Donnelly

1 September 2018 in Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMAnna Maisa
Anna Maisa
SMSarah Milligan
Sarah Milligan
AQAlison Quinn
Alison Quinn
DBDenise Boulter
Denise Boulter
JJJillian Johnston
Jillian Johnston
DBDeclan Terence Bradley
Declan Terence Bradley
Influenza and pertussis vaccination programmes have been in place for pregnant women in the UK since 2009 and 2012, respectively. In 2015, vaccine uptake rates were 55% for influenza and 63% for pertussis in Northern Ireland. We conducted a qualitative study with the aim of learning about the views of pregnant women and identifying potential barriers to vaccination in pregnancy. Qualitative study using focus groups and in-depth interviews. We conducted focus group discussions and interviews on vaccination in pregnancy using a discussion guide developed in consultation with stakeholders and service users. Pregnant women were recruited on-street. We performed inductive coding of transcripts and thematic analysis, using a phenomenological approach. Sixteen pregnant women participated. We identified six key themes. Information and knowledge: Vaccinated and unvaccinated women demonstrated similar levels of knowledge and desire for information, preferring direct communication with healthcare professionals. The influence of others: Some vaccinated participants reported firm endorsements of vaccination by healthcare professionals including midwives, while some unvaccinated women recalled neutral or reticent staff. Acceptance and trust: Most women expressed trust of health professionals. Fear and distrust: Vaccinated individuals expressed concerns about side-effects more than unvaccinated women. A few unvaccinated women expressed distrust of vaccines and healthcare systems. Responsibility for the baby: Both groups prioritised protecting the baby but unvaccinated participants were concerned about vaccine-related harm. Accessing vaccination: Multiple appointments, lack of childcare, time off work and having responsibility to organise vaccination hindered some participants from getting immunised. Some women were willing to be vaccinated but did not recall being offered vaccination or were not sufficiently motivated to make arrangements themselves. Healthcare professionals appear to have a vital influential role in pregnant women's decisions about vaccination. Involving midwives and improving convenience of vaccination access may increase uptake. Strategies to develop interventions should address the aforementioned barriers to meet the pregnant women's needs.

2 February 2018 in Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHannah McKenna
Hannah McKenna
CTCharlene Treanor
Charlene Treanor
DODermot O’reilly
Dermot O’reilly
MDMichael Donnelly
Michael Donnelly
To review studies about the reliability and validity of self-reported alcohol consumption measures among adults, an area which needs updating to reflect current research. Databases (PUBMED (1966-present), MEDLINE (1946-present), EMBASE (1947-present), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (1937-present), PsycINFO (1887-present) and Social Science Citation Index (1976-present)) were searched systematically for studies from inception to 11th August 2017. Pairs of independent reviewers screened study titles, abstracts and full texts with high agreement and a third author resolved disagreements. A comprehensive quality assessment was conducted of the reported psychometric properties of measures of alcohol consumption using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) to derive ratings of poor, fair, good or excellent for each checklist item relating to each psychometric property. Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria and, collectively, they investigated twenty-one short-term recall measures, fourteen quantity-frequency measures and eleven graduated-frequency measures. All measures demonstrated adequate/good test-retest reliability and convergent validity. Quantity-frequency measures demonstrated adequate/good criterion validity; graduated-frequency and short-term recall measures demonstrated adequate/good divergent validity. Quantity-frequency measures and short-term recall measures demonstrated adequate/good hypothesis validity; short-term recall measures demonstrated adequate construct validity. Methodological quality varied within and between studies. It was difficult to discern conclusively which measure was the most reliable and valid given that no study assessed all psychometric properties and the included studies varied in the psychometric properties that they selected to assess. However, when the results from the range of studies were considered and summed, they tended to indicate that the quantity-frequency measure compared to the other two measures performed best in psychometric terms and, therefore, it is likely to produce the most reliable and valid assessment of alcohol consumption in population surveys.