Since its clinical introduction in 1998, the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan has been widely used in the treatment of solid tumors, including colorectal, pancreatic, and lung cancer. Irinotecan therapy is characterized by several dose-limiting toxicities and large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. Irinotecan has a highly complex metabolism, including hydrolyzation by carboxylesterases to its active metabolite SN-38, which is 100- to 1000-fold more active compared with irinotecan itself. Several phase I and II enzymes, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A, are involved in the formation of inactive metabolites, making its metabolism prone to environmental and genetic influences. Genetic variants in the DNA of these enzymes and transporters could predict a part of the drug-related toxicity and efficacy of treatment, which has been shown in retrospective and prospective trials and meta-analyses. Patient characteristics, lifestyle and comedication also influence irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Other factors, including dietary restriction, are currently being studied. Meanwhile, a more tailored approach to prevent excessive toxicity and optimize efficacy is warranted. This review provides an updated overview on today’s literature on irinotecan pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics.

Rationale Mania is a core feature of bipolar disorder (BD) that traditionally is assessed using rating scales. Studies using a new human behavioral pattern monitor (BPM) recently demonstrated that manic BD patients exhibit a specific profile of behavior that differs from schizophrenia and is characterized by increased motor activity, increased specific exploration, and perseverative locomotor patterns as assessed by spatial d. Objectives It was hypothesized that disrupting dopaminergic homeostasis by inhibiting dopamine transporter (DAT) function would produce a BD mania-like phenotype in mice as assessed by the mouse BPM. Methods We compared the spontaneous locomotor and exploratory behavior of C57BL/6J mice treated with the catecholamine transporter inhibitor amphetamine or the selective DAT inhibitor GBR 12909 in the mouse BPM. We also assessed the duration of the effect of GBR 12909 by testing mice in the BPM for 3 h and its potential strain dependency by testing 129/SvJ mice. Results Amphetamine produced hyperactivity and increased perseverative patterns of locomotion as reflected in reduced spatial d values but reduced exploratory activity in contrast to the increased exploration observed in BD patients. GBR 12909 increased activity and reduced spatial d in combination with increased exploratory behavior, irrespective of inbred strain. These effects persisted for at least 3 h. Conclusions Thus, selectively inhibiting the DAT produced a long-lasting cross-strain behavioral profile in mice that was consistent with that observed in manic BD patients. These findings support the use of selective DAT inhibition in animal models of the impaired dopaminergic homeostasis putatively involved in the pathophysiology of BD mania.

Purpose: Our preclinical studies showed that the PARP inhibitor, olaparib, prior to carboplatin attenuated carboplatin cytotoxicity. We evaluated sequence-specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects, safety, and activity of the combination. Experimental Design: Eligible patients had metastatic or recurrent women's cancer. Olaparib tablets were introduced (100 or 200 mg twice daily, days 1–7) in a 3 + 3 dose escalation with carboplatin AUC4 or 5 every 21 days, up to eight cycles, followed by olaparib 300 mg twice daily maintenance. Patients were randomly assigned to starting schedule: cohort A (olaparib days 1–7, carboplatin on day 8) or B (carboplatin on day 1, olaparib days 2–8) during cycle 1. Patients received the reversed scheme in cycle 2. Blood was collected for olaparib pharmacokinetics, platinum–DNA adducts, comet assay, and PAR concentrations. The primary objectives were to examine schedule-dependent effects on olaparib pharmacokinetics and platinum–DNA adducts. Results: A total of 77 (60 ovarian, 14 breast, and 3 uterine cancer) patients were treated. Dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, defining olaparib 200 mg twice daily + carboplatin AUC4 as the MTD. Olaparib clearance was increased approximately 50% when carboplatin was given 24 hours before olaparib. In vitro experiments demonstrated carboplatin preexposure increased olaparib clearance due to intracellular olaparib uptake. Quantities of platinum–DNA adducts were not different as a function of the order of drug administration. Responses included 2 CRs and 31 PRs (46%) with a higher RR in BRCA mutation carriers compared with nonmutation carriers (68% vs. 19%). Conclusions: Tablet olaparib with carboplatin is a safe and active combination. Carboplatin preexposure causes intracellular olaparib accumulation reducing bioavailable olaparib, suggesting carboplatin should be administered prior to olaparib. Clin Cancer Res; 23(6); 1397–406. ©2016 AACR.