Mark Menniti Stecker

Dr. Mark Menniti Stecker

Fresno Institute of Neuroscience, Fresno, California, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2001 in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMark Menniti Stecker
Mark Menniti Stecker
ACAlbert T Cheung
Albert T Cheung
APAlberto Pochettino
Alberto Pochettino
GKGlenn P Kent
Glenn P Kent
TPTerry Patterson
Terry Patterson
JBJoseph E Bavaria
Joseph E Bavaria

1 April 1999 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WTW.O. Tatum
W.O. Tatum
DMD.B. Moore
D.B. Moore
MSMark Menniti Stecker
Mark Menniti Stecker
GBG.H. Baltuch
G.H. Baltuch
JFJ.A. Ferreira
J.A. Ferreira
FVF.L. Vale
F.L. Vale
Article abstract Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve, a recently available option for patients with refractory epilepsy, has demonstrated safety and efficacy. We report four patients with refractory epilepsy who experienced ventricular asystole intraoperatively during initial testing for implantation of the vagus nerve stimulator. Acute intraoperative vagus nerve stimulation may create ventricular asystole in humans. Extracorporeal cervical vagus nerve stimulation testing with continuous EKG monitoring intraoperatively before generator implantation is warranted.

1 August 2002 in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAlbert T Cheung
Albert T Cheung
SWStuart J Weiss
Stuart J Weiss
MMMichael L McGarvey
Michael L McGarvey
MSMark Menniti Stecker
Mark Menniti Stecker
MHMichael S Hogan
Michael S Hogan
JBJoseph E Bavaria
Joseph E Bavaria

1 January 2012 in Surgical Neurology International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMark Menniti Stecker
Mark Menniti Stecker
Background: Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) is a technique that is helpful for assessing the nervous system during spine surgery. Methods: This is a review of the field describing the basic mechanisms behind the techniques of IONM. These include the most often utilized trancranial motor evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), and stimulated and spontaneous EMG activity. It also describes some of the issues regarding practices and qualifications of practitioners. Results: Although the anatomic pathways responsible for the Tc-MEP and SSEP are well known and these clinical techniques have a high sensitivity and specificity, there is little published data showing that monitoring actually leads to improved patient outcomes. It is evident that IONM has high utility when the risk of injury is high, but may be only marginally helpful when the risk of injury is very low. The monitoring team must be well trained, be able to provide the surgeon feedback in real time, and coordinate activities with those of the surgical and anesthesia teams. Conclusions: Although IONM is a valuable technique that provides sensitive and specific indications of neurologic injury, it does have limitations that must be understood. Maintaining a high quality of practice with appropriately trained personnel is critical.

1 January 2001 in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMark Menniti Stecker
Mark Menniti Stecker
ACAlbert T Cheung
Albert T Cheung
APAlberto Pochettino
Alberto Pochettino
GKGlenn P Kent
Glenn P Kent
TPTerry Patterson
Terry Patterson
JBJoseph E Bavaria
Joseph E Bavaria