PURPOSE: Gene fusions play a significant role in cancer etiology, making their detection crucial for accurate diagnosis, prognosis, and determining therapeutic targets. Current diagnostic methods largely focus on either targeted or low-resolution genome-wide techniques, which may be unable to capture rare events or both fusion partners. We investigate if RNA sequencing can overcome current limitations with traditional diagnostic techniques to identify gene fusion events. METHODS: We first performed RNA sequencing on a validation cohort of 24 samples with a known gene fusion event, after which a prospective pan-pediatric cancer cohort (n = 244) was tested by RNA sequencing in parallel to existing diagnostic procedures. This cohort included hematologic malignancies, tumors of the CNS, solid tumors, and suspected neoplastic samples. All samples were processed in the routine diagnostic workflow and analyzed for gene fusions using standard-of-care methods and RNA sequencing. RESULTS: We identified a clinically relevant gene fusion in 83 of 244 cases in the prospective cohort. Sixty fusions were detected by both routine diagnostic techniques and RNA sequencing, and one fusion was detected only in routine diagnostics, but an additional 24 fusions were detected solely by RNA sequencing. RNA sequencing, therefore, increased the diagnostic yield by 38%-39%. In addition, RNA sequencing identified both gene partners involved in the gene fusion, in contrast to most routine techniques. For two patients, the newly identified fusion by RNA sequencing resulted in treatment with targeted agents. CONCLUSION: We show that RNA sequencing is sufficiently robust for gene fusion detection in routine diagnostics of childhood cancers and can make a difference in treatment decisions.
Chromosomal alterations have recurrently been identified in Wilms tumors (WTs) and some are associated with poor prognosis. Gain of 1q (1q+) is of special interest given its high prevalence and is currently actively studied for its prognostic value. However, the underlying mutational mechanisms and functional effects remain unknown. In a national unbiased cohort of 30 primary WTs, we integrated somatic SNVs, CNs and SVs with expression data and distinguished four clusters characterized by affected biological processes: muscle differentiation, immune system, kidney development and proliferation. Combined genome-wide CN and SV profiles showed that tumors profoundly differ in both their types of 1q+ and genomic stability and can be grouped into WTs with co-occurring 1p−/1q+, multiple chromosomal gains or CN neutral tumors. We identified 1q+ in eight tumors that differ in mutational mechanisms, subsequent rearrangements and genomic contexts. Moreover, 1q+ tumors were present in all four expression clusters reflecting activation of various biological processes, and individual tumors overexpress different genes on 1q. In conclusion, by integrating CNs, SVs and gene expression, we identified subgroups of 1q+ tumors reflecting differences in the functional effect of 1q gain, indicating that expression data is likely needed for further risk stratification of 1q+ WTs.
Background: Central nervous system (CNS) tumors represent the leading cause of pediatric cancer-related deaths. Primary treatment often involves neurosurgical tumor resection. Accurate diagnosis is crucial to perform the best-suited extent of resection. Recently, we published Sturgeon, an AI-based validated intraoperative nanopore sequencing tool, delivering accurate methylation-based diagnoses during surgery. Although several other nanopore sequencing strategies have been described, clear evidence of clinical impact remains critically absent. Here, we report a care evaluation analyzing the impact of Sturgeon on real-time pediatric neurosurgical decision-making. Methods: Since May 2023, a dual diagnostic neuro-oncological workflow incorporating intraoperative frozen section analyses and ultra-fast nanopore sequencing using Sturgeon has been fully implemented as standard of care at the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology in the Netherlands. This intraoperative diagnostic workflow has been applied to all pediatric patients (<19 years of age) with primary CNS tumors and the multidisciplinary indication for tumor resection surgery. Results: Sturgeon delivered correct diagnoses in 82 out of 94 consecutive patients (87.2%, <90 minutes), no diagnosis in 11.7% and one incorrect diagnosis (1.1%). The diagnosis obtained by Sturgeon supported the intended surgical strategy (85.7%) or changed the strategy (14.3%) toward a more aggressive or limited resection. This contributed to a low complication rate and less second-look surgeries. Earlier communication of the histomolecular diagnosis to patients and their families was observed. Conclusions: Intraoperative use of Sturgeon provides essential guidance toward the most optimal neurosurgical strategy for pediatric CNS tumors and thereby has great potential to contribute to better clinical outcome.