Rupa Valdez

Dr. Rupa Valdez

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 August 2014 in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RVRupa Valdez
Rupa Valdez
RHRichard J Holden
Richard J Holden
LNLaurie L Novak
Laurie L Novak
TVTiffany C Veinot
Tiffany C Veinot
Designing patient-centered consumer health informatics (CHI) applications requires understanding and creating alignment with patients’ and their family members’ health-related activities, referred to here as ‘patient work’. A patient work approach to CHI draws on medical social science and human factors engineering models and simultaneously attends to patients, their family members, activities, and context. A patient work approach extends existing approaches to CHI design that are responsive to patients’ biomedical realities and personal skills and behaviors. It focuses on the embeddedness of patients’ health management in larger processes and contexts and prioritizes patients’ perspectives on illness management. Future research is required to advance (1) theories of patient work, (2) methods for assessing patient work, and (3) techniques for translating knowledge of patient work into CHI application design. Advancing a patient work approach within CHI is integral to developing and deploying consumer-facing technologies that are integrated with patients’ everyday lives.

18 November 2020 in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RVRupa Valdez
Rupa Valdez
CRCourtney C Rogers
Courtney C Rogers
HCHenry Claypool
Henry Claypool
LTLucy Trieshmann
Lucy Trieshmann
OFOlivia Frye
Olivia Frye
PKPoorna Kushalnagar
Poorna Kushalnagar
The widespread use of telehealth resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to further exacerbate inequities faced by people with disabilities. Although, for some members of the disability community, the option to engage with telehealth may result in reduced barriers to care, for others, inadequate attention to the design, implementation, and policy dimensions may be detrimental. Addressing such considerations is imperative to mitigate health inequities faced by the disability community.

27 October 2014 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RVRupa Valdez
Rupa Valdez
TGThomas M Guterbock
Thomas M Guterbock
MTMorgan J Thompson
Morgan J Thompson
JRJeremiah D Reilly
Jeremiah D Reilly
HMHannah K Menefee
Hannah K Menefee
DRDeborah L Rexrode
Deborah L Rexrode
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet

10 August 2016 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ACAlexis V Chaet
Alexis V Chaet
BMBijan Morshedi
Bijan Morshedi
KWKristen J Wells
Kristen J Wells
LBLaura Barnes
Laura Barnes
RVRupa Valdez
Rupa Valdez
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet


14 May 2021 in Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MOMustafa Ozkaynak
Mustafa Ozkaynak
CSChristina M. Sircar
Christina M. Sircar
OFOlivia Frye
Olivia Frye
RVRupa Valdez
Rupa Valdez
Background: Design workshops offer effective methods in eliciting end-user participation from design inception to completion. Workshops unite stakeholders in the utilization of participatory methods, coalescing in the best possible creative solutions. Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify design approaches whilst providing guidance to health information technology designers/researchers in devising and organizing workshops. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in five medical/library databases identifying 568 articles. The initial duplication removal resulted in 562 articles. A criteria-based screening of the title field, abstracts, and pre-full-texts reviews resulted in 72 records for full-text review. The final review resulted in 10 article exclusions. Results: 62 publications were included in the review. These studies focused on consumer facing and clinical health information technologies. The studied technologies involved both clinician and patients and encompassed an array of health conditions. Diverse workshop activities and deliverables were reported. Only seven publications reported workshop evaluation data. Discussion: This systematic review focused on workshops as a design and research activity in the health informatics domain. Our review revealed three themes: (1) There are a variety of ways of conducting design workshops; (2) Workshops are effective design and research approaches; (3) Various levels of workshop details were reported.