Ribociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor and ovarian function suppression is the preferred first-line option for pre-/perimenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. We opened an italian managed access program (MAP) that permitted access to ribociclib to selected patients and allowed to collect informative results on the clinical impact of the therapy. The MAP (April 2018–May 2020) included 64 premenopausal patients, with characteristics similar to those of the MONALEESA-7 trial. Of 57 patients with a known response, 48 (84.2%) achieved a clinical benefit (i.e., complete response, N = 7 (12.3%); partial response, N = 17 (29.8%); stable disease, N = 24 (42.1%)), while 9 (15.8%) experienced tumor progression. Some patients (N = 15–23.4%) needed ribociclib dose reduction because of adverse events. Thereafter, the treatment was well tolerated, and no new safety signals emerged. Our study is the first reported Italian real-world evidence of ribociclib effectiveness in premenopausal HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer patients. Response and clinical benefit rates were particularly encouraging compared with those of the ribociclib group of MONALEESA-7. Our work confirms that ribociclib in combination with endocrine therapy is highly effective in the treatment of premenopausal HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer patients with an expected safety profile.

Background Ribociclib plus letrozole demonstrated manageable safety and efficacy profiles in hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in the Phase 3b CompLEEment-1 trial. Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ribociclib plus letrozole in the Italian subpopulation with HR+, HER2− ABC from the CompLEEment-1 trial. Patients and Methods Patients with HR+, HER2− ABC received ribociclib (600 mg/day, 3 weeks on/1 week off) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/day) while men and premenopausal women additionally received goserelin. Patients were allowed with ≤ 1 line of prior chemotherapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 2. The primary outcome included safety and tolerability. Results Of the 554 Italian patients, 246 (44.4 %) patients completed treatment. The reasons for treatment discontinuation included progressive disease (PD; 36.6 %), adverse events (AEs; 11.9 %), and death (1.6 %). All-grade AEs and grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in 98.9 % and 77.8 % patients, respectively. The most common treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (73.6 %), followed by leukopenia (32.1 %), and nausea (25.3 %). The overall response rate was 28.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 24.4–32.1); clinical benefit rate was 71.7 % (95 % CI, 67.7–75.4); and median time to progression was 26.7 months (95 % CI, 24.8-non-estimable). Health-related quality of life scores were maintained during treatment. Conclusion The safety and efficacy profiles of ribociclib plus letrozole in the Italian subpopulation was found to be consistent with the CompLEEment-1 global population result, MONALEESA-2, and MONALEESA-7 outcomes, which reaffirm ribociclib plus letrozole as the frontline treatment option in patients with HR+, HER2− ABC. Trial Registration Number and Date of Registration NCT02941926 (30 November 2016).

Aims: To explore the cardiac safety of adjuvant Non-Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (NPL-DOX) plus Cyclophosphamide (CTX) followed by weekly Paclitaxel, in elderly women (≥ 65 years) with high-risk breast cancer. Previously, we described no symptomatic cardiac events within the first 12 months from starting treatment. We now reported the updated results after a median follow-up 76 months. Methods: The cardiac activity was evaluated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) echocardiograms assessments, before starting chemotherapy and every 6 months, until 30 months from baseline, then yearly for at least 5 years. Results: Forty-seven women were recruited by two Units of Medical Oncology (Ethics Committee authorization CESM-AOUP, 3203/2011; EudraCT identification number: 2010-024067-41, for Pisa and Pontedera Hospitals). An episode of grade 3 CHF (NCI-CTCAE, version 3.0) occurred after 18 months the beginning of chemotherapy. The echocardiograms assessments were performed comparing the LVEF values of each patient evaluated at fixed period of time, compared to baseline. We observed a slight changed in terms of mean values at 48, 60, 72 and 84 months. At these time points, a statistically significant reduction of − 3.2%, − 4.6%, − 6.4% and − 7.1%, respectively, was observed. However, LVEF remained above 50% without translation in any relevant clinical signs. No other cardiac significant episodes were reported. To this analysis, in 13 patients (28%) occurred disease relapse and, of them, 11 (23%) died due to metastatic disease. Eight patients died of cancer-unrelated causes. Conclusions: The combination including NPL-DOX in elderly patients revealed low rate of cardiac toxic effects. Comparative trials are encouraged.

Urothelial carcinoma represents one of the deadliest urological tumors, due to its biological aggressiveness and the ephemeral response to platinum-based chemotherapy of advanced-stage disease. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has positively impacted the prognosis of these patients, although only a proportion of them achieve long lasting disease control. As with other solid tumors, in the last decade, there has been a growing interest in the molecular characterization of urothelial carcinoma in order to identify new therapeutic targets and improve survival in these patients. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the main evidence available in the literature concerning the role of targeted therapies in urothelial carcinoma, especially focusing on related molecular targets, published data on clinical efficacy, and on future perspectives. Specifically, the effort of this review aims to strengthen the clinical impact of well-known molecular patterns and relative target treatments (such as FGFR inhibitors and Nectin-4-directed antibody–drug conjugates) and to examine the role and preliminary data of drugs targeting biomarkers that are not yet commonly used in clinical practice (such as HER2).

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i) represented a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with metastatic hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer patients. When disease progression occurs and further hormonal manipulations or target therapies fail, chemotherapy remains a therapeutic choice. For these reasons, resources should be invested in redesigning the best treatment strategy with the current chemotherapy drugs available. Nevertheless, the preferred strategy typically remains a planned sequence of single chemotherapeutic agents. This approach endeavors to extend overall survival and maintain quality of life. Within this complex and evolving therapeutic scenario, where the necessity for effective and treatment options is crucial, we explore in the present paper a perspective for a hypothetical new role of bevacizumab combined with paclitaxel for patients with metastatic HR+, HER2- breast cancer patients resistant to hormone therapy. Recent findings from our preliminary published pharmacogenetic studies, could suggest the efficacy of bevacizumab as linked to a well-defined genomic profile of genes implicated in the process of neoangiogenesis (e.g., favorable profile: VEGF-A rs833061/VEGFR-2 rs1870377: CT/AT, CT/AA, TT/AA, TT/TT, CC/TT), concluding the present perspective underlying the fact that bevacizumab combined with paclitaxel will be reconsidered with this new potential use only if well-designed prospective trials confirm what has been observed from our retrospective data.