Giulio Maccauro

Dr. Giulio Maccauro


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 1999 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPC. Piconi
C. Piconi
GMGiulio Maccauro
Giulio Maccauro

1 August 1998 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPC. Piconi
C. Piconi
WBW. Burger
W. Burger
HRH.G. Richter
H.G. Richter
ACA. Cittadini
A. Cittadini
GMGiulio Maccauro
Giulio Maccauro
EME. Marmo
E. Marmo

10 August 2011 in International Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMGiulio Maccauro
Giulio Maccauro
MSMaria Silvia Spinelli
Maria Silvia Spinelli
SMSigismondo Mauro
Sigismondo Mauro
CPCarlo Perisano
Carlo Perisano
CGCalogero Graci
Calogero Graci
MRMichele Attilio Rosa
Michele Attilio Rosa
The metastasis is the spread of cancer from one part of the body to another. Two-thirds of patients with cancer will develop bone metastasis. Breast, prostate and lung cancer are responsible for more than 80% of cases of metastatic bone disease. The spine is the most common site of bone metastasis. A spinal metastasis may cause pain, instability and neurological injuries. The diffusion through Batson venous system is the principal process of spinal metastasis, but the dissemination is possible also through arterial and lymphatic system or by contiguity. Once cancer cells have invaded the bone, they produce growth factors that stimulate osteoblastic or osteolytic activity resulting in bone remodeling with release of other growth factors that lead to a vicious cycle of bone destruction and growth of local tumour.

20 September 2016 in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Costantino ErraniCostantino Errani
Costantino Errani
Andreas F. MavrogenisAndreas F. Mavrogenis
Andreas F. Mavrogenis
LCLuca Cevolani
Luca Cevolani
SSSilvia Spinelli
Silvia Spinelli
APAndrea Piccioli
Andrea Piccioli
DDDavide Maria Donati
Davide Maria Donati

2 December 2015 in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GSGiuseppe Rosario Schirò
Giuseppe Rosario Schirò
SSSergio Sessa
Sergio Sessa
APAndrea Piccioli
Andrea Piccioli
GMGiulio Maccauro
Giulio Maccauro
In the last decades a lot of new reconstructive techniques were developed for the treatment of mangled lower extremity. However failed attempt to limb salvage is related to high risk of mortality for the patient. Several scores were developed to establish guidelines for the decision to amputate or not, however in literature there is no consensus about the reliability of this scores. The authors focused their attention on the most used score system to provide guidance of the management of a mangled lower limb. The search term used included mangled lower extremity, MESS, PSI, LSI and NISSSA. The inclusion criteria were: studies dealing with mangled lower extremity; articles reporting MESS, PSI, LSI or NISSSA scores; articles published in English in PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and web of science in the last 30 years, minimum number of cases in study of 15, minimum follow up of 1 year. According with the criteria described above, we found 134 articles in PubMed, 165 articles in Scopus, 111 articles in the Cochrane Library and 108 articles in Web of Science. The most used score in literature is the MESS. Few results are shown using the other severity scores. There are a lot of controversies in literature about the use of this scale. MESS seems to be more accurate than the LSI in prediction of limb salvage. LSI score shows better results when applied to type III tibial fractures. High sentivity of the PSI score is described when applied to predict successful limb salvage. Low sensitivity and specificity are described for the NISSSA score. The literature is very poor of articles related to mangled lower extremity in children. Higher sensitivity and specificity are described for these scores in children when compared to adult population. The mangled lower extremity treatment is a challenge for the surgeon. Many scores were developed to help the surgeon, however they cannot be used as the sole criterion by which amputation decision are made and, in case of succesful limb salvage, they are not predictive of the functional recovery. Moreover, undue enthusiasm for new surgical techniques can lead to increased morbidity and mortality in case of secondary amputation.

1 February 1999 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAlessandro Sgambato
Alessandro Sgambato
NBN. Bruzzese
N. Bruzzese
GMGiulio Maccauro
Giulio Maccauro
CAC. Andreassi
C. Andreassi
GRG.A. Ricci
G.A. Ricci
ACA. Cittadini
A. Cittadini