A buckling-restrained brace (BRB) serves as a typical load-bearing and energy-dissipative device for the passive control of structures under seismic loading. A BRB is generally designed to not yield under frequently occurring earthquake (FOE) and wind loads, resulting in it having less effectiveness in vibration reduction compared with post-yielding performance. To address this dilemma, this study proposed the concept and technique details of the viscoelastic-yielding compounded BRB (VBRB). Different from a conventional BRB, a VBRB is fabricated by attaching the viscoelastic damper (VED) to the surface of a BRB’s steel casing, ensuring a compatible deformation pattern between the VED and the BRB’s steel core. A dynamic loading test of VBRB specimens was carried out in which 0.2 Hz~0.6 Hz in loading rate and a maximum of 550 kN in load-bearing capacity had been applied, verifying the feasibility and performance of the VBRB. Subsequently, a parametric design procedure was developed to determine the required VBRB parameters so that the maximum elastic drift response of the structure could be reduced to the code-prescriptive value. The wind-resistance and seismic performances of the VBRB were critically evaluated through dynamic time-history analyses on a 48-story mega VBRB-equipped frame designed according to the Chinese seismic design code (GB50011-2010), and the effectiveness of the approach was also verified. Results indicate that the VBRB has advantages over a conventional BRB by providing a multi-stage passive energy dissipation capacity, resulting in a better vibration-control effect than conventional BRBs for structures subjected to wind load and seismic excitations.

Selecting an appropriate ground motion intensity measure (IM) to estimate the aleatory uncertainty produced by ground motion variability is the first and crucial step in fragility analysis. The choice of IM is influenced not only by the structural system type itself but also by the limit state of the structural damage. In this study, an investigation of the selection of IM in fragility analysis with respect to different limit states is developed for a 48-story mega-scale steel frame structure with buckling restrained braces. A comparative study of the efficiency of 27 IMs is conducted at four structural damage limit states, i.e., negligible, light, moderate, and severe, through the lognormal standard deviation estimated in fragility equations. In addition, for the purpose of considering the influence of different earthquake characteristics, two completely different sets of ground motions are selected, namely near-field pulse-like and far-field earthquakes. The research shows that the ground motion characteristics and structural damage limit states have nonnegligible effects on the flexibility of intensity measures. For combination-type IMs, the number of combined terms and the combined power index have a significant impact on their performance; thus, an optimized dual-parameter combination-type intensity measure is recommended.