Human cancer cells overexpress many peptide receptors as molecular targets. Radiolabeled peptides that bind with high affinity and specificity to the receptors on tumor cells hold great potential for both diagnostic imaging and targeted radionuclide therapy. The advantage of solid-phase peptide synthesis, the availability of different chelating agents and prosthetic groups and bioconjugation techniques permit the facile preparation of a wide variety of peptide-based targeting molecules with diverse biological and tumor targeting properties. Some of these peptides, including somatostatin, bombesin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, gastrin, neurotensin, exendin and RGD are currently under investigation. It is anticipated that in the near future many of these peptides may find applications in nuclear oncology. This article presents recent developments in the field of small peptides, and their applications in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

Somatostatin receptor (sstr) scintigraphy for imaging and sstr analogs for treatment have been used for more than 20 y. An important improvement in recent years was the introduction of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with radiolabeled sstr agonists, such as [⁹⁰Y-DOTA⁰,Tyr³]octreotide or [¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA⁰,Tyr³]octreotide (⁹⁰Y- or ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC, respectively) and [¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA⁰,Tyr³]octreotate (¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE). PET/CT with ⁶⁸Ga-labeled sstr agonists, such as ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE, and [⁶⁸Ga-DOTA,1-Nal³]octreotide (⁶⁸Ga-DOTANOC), plays an important role in staging and restaging neuroendocrine tumors. Most importantly, sstr scintigraphy and sstr PET/CT can distinguish patients who will qualify for and benefit from peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. This characteristic of sstr targeting is important because it allows a personalized treatment approach (theranostic approach). Until recently, it was thought that internalization of the radiolabeled agonist was mandatory for sstr-mediated imaging and therapy. It was Ginj et al. who proposed in 2006 the paradigm shift that radiolabeled sstr antagonists may perform better than agonists despite the lack of internalization. Despite the rather limited number of head-to-head comparisons of sstr antagonists and agonists, the superiority of sstr antagonists was demonstrated in several cases. From a small library of sstr antagonists, the analog JR11 (Cpa-c[d-Cys-Aph(Hor)-d-Aph(Cbm)-Lys-Thr-Cys]-d-Tyr-NH₂), an antagonist with selectivity for sstr subtype 2, showed the best overall characteristics for sstr subtype 2 targeting and was therefore selected for clinical translation. JR11 is under clinical development as a PET imaging agent when labeled with ⁶⁸Ga (⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-JR11 or ⁶⁸Ga-OPS202) and as a therapeutic agent when labeled with ¹⁷⁷Lu (¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-JR11 or ¹⁷⁷Lu-OPS201). In this article, we discuss the development and current status of radiolabeled sstr antagonists. Evidence based on preclinical work, on quantitative in vivo autoradiography of human tumor slices, and on human data now supports a shift to sstr antagonists.

Preclinical and clinical studies have indicated that somatostatin receptor (sst)-expressing tumors demonstrate higher uptake of radiolabeled sst antagonists than of sst agonists. In 4 consecutive patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors, we evaluated whether treatment with (177)Lu-labeled sst antagonists is feasible. After injection of approximately 1 GBq of (177)Lu-DOTA-[Cpa-c(DCys-Aph(Hor)-DAph(Cbm)-Lys-Thr-Cys)-DTyr-NH2] ((177)Lu-DOTA-JR11) and (177)Lu-DOTATATE, 3-dimensional voxel dosimetry analysis based on SPECT/CT was performed. A higher tumor-to-organ dose ratio for (177)Lu-DOTA-JR11 than for (177)Lu-DOTATATE was the prerequisite for treatment with (177)Lu-DOTA-JR11. Reversible minor adverse effects of (177)Lu-DOTA-JR11 were observed. (177)Lu-DOTA-JR11 showed a 1.7-10.6 times higher tumor dose than (177)Lu-DOTATATE. At the same time, the tumor-to-kidney and tumor-to-bone marrow dose ratio was 1.1-7.2 times higher. All 4 patients were treated with (177)Lu-DOTA-JR11, resulting in partial remission in 2 patients, stable disease in 1 patient, and mixed response in the other patient. Treatment of neuroendocrine tumors with radiolabeled sst antagonists is clinically feasible and may have a significant impact on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Somatostatin-based radiolabeled peptides have been successfully introduced into the clinic for targeted imaging and radionuclide therapy of somatostatin receptor (sst)–positive tumors, especially of subtype 2 (sst2). The clinically used peptides are exclusively agonists. Recently, we showed that radiolabeled antagonists may be preferable to agonists because they showed better pharmacokinetics, including higher tumor uptake. Factors determining the performance of radioantagonists have only scarcely been studied. Here, we report on the development and evaluation of four ⁶⁴Cu or ⁶⁸Ga radioantagonists for PET of sst2-positive tumors. Methods: The novel antagonist p-Cl-Phe-cyclo(D-Cys-Tyr-D-4-amino-Phe(carbamoyl)-Lys-Thr-Cys)D-Tyr-NH₂ (LM3) was coupled to 3 macrocyclic chelators, namely 4,11-bis(carboxymethyl)-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclo[6.6.2]hexadecane (CB-TE2A), 1,4,7-triazacyclononane,1-glutaric acid-4,7-acetic acid (NODAGA), and DOTA. ^64/natCu- and ^68/natGa-NODAGA-LM3 were prepared at room temperature, and ^64/natCu-CB-TE2A-LM3 and ^68/natGa-DOTA-LM3 were prepared at 95°C. Binding affinity and antagonistic properties were determined with receptor autoradiography and immunofluorescence microscopy using human embryonic kidney (HEK)-sst2 cells. In vitro internalization and dissociation was evaluated using the same cell line. Biodistribution and small-animal PET studies were performed with HEK-sst2 xenografts. Results: All metallopeptides demonstrated antagonistic properties. The affinities depend on chelator and radiometal and vary about 10-fold; ^68/natGa-NODAGA-LM3 has the lowest half maximal inhibitory concentration (1.3 ± 0.3 nmol/L). The biodistribution studies show impressive tumor uptake at 1 h after injection, particularly of ⁶⁴Cu- and ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-LM3 (∼40 percentage injected dose per gram of tissue [%ID/g]), which were proven to be specific. Background clearance was fast and the tumor washout relatively slow for ⁶⁴Cu-NODAGA-LM3 (∼15 %ID/g, 24 h after injection) and almost negligible for ⁶⁴Cu-CB-TE2A-LM3 (26.9 ± 3.3 %ID/g and 21.6 ± 2.1 %ID/g, 4 and 24 h after injection, respectively). Tumor–to–normal-tissue ratios were significantly higher for ⁶⁴Cu-NODAGA-LM3 than for ⁶⁴Cu-CB-TE2A-LM3 (tumor-to-kidney, 12.8 ± 3.6 and 1.7 ± 0.3, respectively; tumor-to-muscle, 1,342 ± 115 and 75.2 ± 8.5, respectively, at 24 h, P < 0.001). Small-animal PET shows clear tumor localization and high image contrast, especially for ⁶⁴Cu- and ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-LM3. Conclusion: This article demonstrates the strong dependence of the affinity and pharmacokinetics of the somatostatin-based radioantagonists on the chelator and radiometal. ⁶⁴Cu- and ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and ⁶⁴Cu-CB-TE2A-LM3 are promising candidates for clinical translation because of their favorable pharmacokinetics and the high image contrast on PET scans.