Bart Reinholdt Johnson

Dr. Bart Reinholdt Johnson


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 July 2023 in Fire
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BJBart Reinholdt Johnson
Bart Reinholdt Johnson
AAAlan A. Ager
Alan A. Ager
CECody Evers
Cody Evers
DHDavid W. Hulse
David W. Hulse
MNMax Nielsen-Pincus
Max Nielsen-Pincus
JBJohn P. Bolte
John P. Bolte
We integrated a mechanistic wildfire simulation system with an agent-based landscape change model to investigate the feedbacks among climate change, population growth, development, landowner decision-making, vegetative succession, and wildfire. Our goal was to develop an adaptable simulation platform for anticipating risk-mitigation tradeoffs in a fire-prone wildland–urban interface (WUI) facing conditions outside the bounds of experience. We describe how five social and ecological system (SES) submodels interact over time and space to generate highly variable alternative futures even within the same scenario as stochastic elements in simulated wildfire, succession, and landowner decisions create large sets of unique, path-dependent futures for analysis. We applied the modeling system to an 815 km2 study area in western Oregon at a sub-taxlot parcel grain and annual timestep, generating hundreds of alternative futures for 2007–2056 (50 years) to explore how WUI communities facing compound risks from increasing wildfire and expanding periurban development can situate and assess alternative risk management approaches in their localized SES context. The ability to link trends and uncertainties across many futures to processes and events that unfold in individual futures is central to the modeling system. By contrasting selected alternative futures, we illustrate how assessing simulated feedbacks between wildfire and other SES processes can identify tradeoffs and leverage points in fire-prone WUI landscapes. Assessments include a detailed “post-mortem” of a rare, extreme wildfire event, and uncovered, unexpected stabilizing feedbacks from treatment costs that reduced the effectiveness of agent responses to signs of increasing risk.

27 November 2009 in Biological Invasions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SHSusan E. Holmes
Susan E. Holmes
BRBitty A. Roy
Bitty A. Roy
JRJim P. Reed
Jim P. Reed
BJBart Reinholdt Johnson
Bart Reinholdt Johnson

29 November 2022 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRRobert G. Ribe
Robert G. Ribe
MNMax Nielsen-Pincus
Max Nielsen-Pincus
BJBart Reinholdt Johnson
Bart Reinholdt Johnson
CEChris Enright
Chris Enright
DHDavid Hulse
David Hulse
Private landowners in the southern Willamette Valley of Oregon, USA were surveyed. The survey queried probabilities of implementing specific fuels reduction projects in extensive areas of specific forest types on their property. The projects were described in relation to the beginning and target forest types, the actions required, costs, and long-term maintenance. Forest types were first rated for scenic beauty and informed levels of wildfire risk reduction, scarce habitat production, and associated property rights risks. Propensities to perform each fuels reduction project were then obtained. These were adversely affected by disbelief in heightened wildfire risks or climate change, higher project costs, feelings of hopeless vulnerability to wildfire, and low aesthetic affections for target forests. Propensities were enhanced by aesthetic affection for target forests, belief in the efficaciousness of fuels reduction, previous experience with wildfire evacuation, and higher incomes. All landowners favored thinning of young conifer forests, but some were averse to thinning of mature conifer forests. Anthropocentric landowners, mainly farmers, foresters, and some small holders, tended to favor conventional thinnings toward commercially valuable conifer forests and avoided long-term habitat maintenance. Nature-centric landowners, mainly some rural residents and wealthy estate owners, leaned more toward long term habitat goals and oak forests.

17 April 2025 in Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EAEge University Faculty of Agriculture Department of Landscape Architecture
Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Department of Landscape Architecture
ŞHŞerif Hepcan
Şerif Hepcan
ÇHÇiğdem Coşkun Hepcan
Çiğdem Coşkun Hepcan
BJBart Reinholdt Johnson
Bart Reinholdt Johnson
UAUniversity of Oregon College of Design School of Architecture and Environment Department of Landscape Architecture
University of Oregon College of Design School of Architecture and Environment Department of Landscape Architecture
EHEge University Faculty of Agriculture Department of Animal Husbandry
Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Department of Animal Husbandry
Urban green spaces play a role in mitigating environmental challenges and enhancing urban sustainability and resilience. The paper aims to assess the four regulating ecosystem services (carbon storage and sequestration, runoff control, and air pollutant removal) in ten neighborhood parks in Eugene, Oregon (USA). Using the I-Tree Eco model, the contribution of urban trees to ecosystem services supply is evaluated. Similarities and dissimilarities between the neighborhood parks are analyzed using Multidimensional Scaling (MDS). The major findings show significant variation in ecosystem service supply, influenced mainly by the parks' tree canopy and leaf area index. Mature and large-canopy trees emerged as critical contributors, underlining their importance in optimizing regulating services. The fact that no single park offers all four ecosystem services at optimal levels highlights the necessity for a comprehensive, city-wide strategy for green space management. The study provides guidelines for urban green space planning and management, emphasizing the importance of preserving mature trees and adopting targeted planting strategies to enhance ecosystem services supply. These findings contribute to sustainable urban planning, supporting the development of more ecosystem services-friendly urban green spaces to address societal challenges.