Integrins are considered the main cell-adhesion transmembrane receptors that play multifaceted roles as extracellular matrix (ECM)-cytoskeletal linkers and transducers in biochemical and mechanical signals between cells and their environment in a wide range of states in health and diseases. Integrin functions are dependable on a delicate balance between active and inactive status via multiple mechanisms, including protein-protein interactions, conformational changes, and trafficking. Due to their exposure on the cell surface and sensitivity to the molecular blockade, integrins have been investigated as pharmacological targets for nearly 40 years, but given the complexity of integrins and sometimes opposite characteristics, targeting integrin therapeutics has been a challenge. To date, only seven drugs targeting integrins have been successfully marketed, including abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban, natalizumab, vedolizumab, lifitegrast, and carotegrast. Currently, there are approximately 90 kinds of integrin-based therapeutic drugs or imaging agents in clinical studies, including small molecules, antibodies, synthetic mimic peptides, antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, imaging agents, etc. A serious lesson from past integrin drug discovery and research efforts is that successes rely on both a deep understanding of integrin-regulatory mechanisms and unmet clinical needs. Herein, we provide a systematic and complete review of all integrin family members and integrin-mediated downstream signal transduction to highlight ongoing efforts to develop new therapies/diagnoses from bench to clinic. In addition, we further discuss the trend of drug development, how to improve the success rate of clinical trials targeting integrin therapies, and the key points for clinical research, basic research, and translational research.

Chronic liver diseases, primarily metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic and metabolic dysfunction-associated alcoholic liver disease (MetALD), and viral hepatitis, can lead to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and cancer. Hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation plays a central role in the development of myofibroblasts and fibrogenesis in chronic liver diseases. However, HSC activation is influenced by the complex microenvironments within the liver, which are largely shaped by the interactions between HSCs and various other cell types. Changes in HSC phenotypes and metabolic mechanisms involve glucose, lipid, and cholesterol metabolism, oxidative stress, activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR), autophagy, ferroptosis, senescence, and nuclear receptors. Clinical interventions targeting these pathways have shown promising results in addressing liver inflammation and fibrosis, as well as in modulating glucose and lipid metabolism and metabolic stress responses. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of HSC phenotypes and metabolic mechanisms presents opportunities for novel therapeutic approaches aimed at halting or even reversing chronic liver diseases.

Platelets are essential for blood clotting and maintaining normal hemostasis. In pathological conditions, platelets are increasingly recognized as crucial regulatory factors in various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Resting platelets are induced by various factors such as immune complexes through Fc receptors, platelet-targeting autoantibodies and other platelet-activating stimuli. Platelet activation in immunological processes involves the release of immune activation stimuli, antigen presentation and interaction with immune cells. Platelets participate in both the innate immune system (neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs) and Natural Killer (NK) cells and the adaptive immune system (T and B cells). Clinical therapeutic strategies include targeting platelet activation, platelet-immune cell interaction and platelet-endothelial cell interaction, which display positive development prospects. Understanding the mechanisms of platelets in immunity is important, and developing targeted modulations of these mechanisms will pave the way for promising therapeutic strategies.

1. The aim was to employ real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology (TaqMan ®) to examine the induction of some selected cytochrome P450 (CYP) forms in precision-cut rat liver slices. 2. Taqman ® primers and probe sets were developed for rat CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2B1 and CYP4A1 forms. 3. Rat liver slices were cultured in control medium or medium containing either 10 µg ml -1 Aroclor 1254 (ARO), 500µM sodium phenobarbitone (NaPB) or 50µM Wy-14,643 (WY) for 3, 6 and 24 h. 4. Compared with control liver slices, treatment with ARO for 3 and 6 h produced 24- and 184-fold increases, respectively, in CYP1A1 mRNA levels, and after 24h produced an 85-fold increase in CYP1A2 mRNA levels. Levels of CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 mRNA were not markedly affected by NaPB and WY. 5. Treatment with ARO and PB for 24 h produced 10.6- and 23.8-fold increases, respectively, in CYP2B1 mRNA. Levels of CYP2B1 mRNA were not markedly affected by WY. 6. Treatment with WY, but not ARO and NaPB, for 24h produced a 20.4-fold increase in levels of CYP4A1 mRNA. 7. These results demonstrate that cultured liver slices may be used to evaluate the effect of xenobiotics on CYP form mRNA levels.

Background: The regimens of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or with chemotherapy are emerging as systemic therapy for patients with advanced and metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. However, the risk of treatment-related hematologic toxicity stays unclear.Methods: We enrolled in phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 inhibitors in advanced and metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. The incidences of overall treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), discontinuation, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were extracted for the Bayesian network meta-analysis. Analyses with poor convergence or low incidence were reported as incidences with 95% CIs instead.Results: Sixteen phase 3 RCTs with 9732 patients who received systemic therapy were included. A total of 150 (1.54% [95% CI 1.31–1.80]) treatment-related death events were recorded, whereas 13 (0.13% [95% CI 0.08–0.22]) of them were hematologic. 0.24% (95% CI 0.12–0.48) patients received ICI plus chemotherapy were recorded for hematological deaths, 0.09% (95% CI 0.01–0.23) were for chemotherapy alone, and 0.05% were for ICI alone (95% CI 0.01–0.29). Febrile neutropenia was the most frequent cause of death in ICI with chemotherapy. For grade ≥3 TRAEs, we found nivolumab plus chemotherapy (OR 1.63 [95% CI 0.84–3.17]) had a higher risk than other treatments. Overall, ICI monotherapy led to fewer AEs than chemotherapy-based regimens in the analyses of leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Among the 11 treatments, toripalimab plus chemotherapy possessed the highest risk in any-grade leukopenia (OR 1.84 [95% CI 0.48, 6.82]) and neutropenia (OR 1.71 [95% CI 0.17, 17.40]) respectively. For grade ≥3 hematologic AEs, neutropenia (20.08% [95% CI 18.67–21.56]) related to ICI plus chemotherapy was the most dominant. ICI plus chemotherapy was likely to increase the incidence than dosing these drugs alone.Conclusion: Using ICI alone had a low incidence of causing hematologic mortality and AEs, while the combination with chemotherapy might magnify the side effects. Comprehensively, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and sintilimab plus chemotherapy were the safest regimens in terms of leukopenia and neutropenia respectively. This study will guide clinical practice for ICI-based chemotherapy.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022380150

C-type lectin-like receptor-2 (CLEC-2) is a member of the C-type lectin superfamily of cell surface receptors. The first confirmed endogenous and exogenous ligands of CLEC-2 are podoplanin and rhodocytin, respectively. CLEC-2 is expressed on the surface of platelets, which participates in platelet activation and aggregation by binding with its ligands. CLEC-2 and its ligands are involved in pathophysiological processes, such as atherosclerosis, cancer, inflammatory thrombus status, maintenance of vascular wall integrity, and cancer-related thrombosis. In the last 5 years, different anti- podoplanin antibody types have been developed for the treatment of cancers, such as glioblastoma and lung cancer. New tests and new diagnostics targeting CLEC-2 are also discussed. CLEC-2 mediates thrombosis in various pathological states, but CLEC-2-specific deletion does not affect normal hemostasis, which would provide a new therapeutic tool for many thromboembolic diseases. The CLEC-2-podoplanin interaction is a target for cancer treatment. CLEC-2 may be applied in clinical practice and play a therapeutic role.