Chenming Zhang

Prof. Chenming Zhang

Department of Biological Systems Engineering, VT-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (affiliated faculty), Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2015 in International Journal of Nanomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BXBin Xu
Bin Xu
RWRebekah Watkins
Rebekah Watkins
LWLing Wu
Ling Wu
Chenming ZhangChenming Zhang
Chenming Zhang
RDRichey McLane Davis
Richey McLane Davis
Natural products have been used in medicine for many years. Many top-selling pharmaceuticals are natural compounds or their derivatives. These plant- or microorganism-derived compounds have shown potential as therapeutic agents against cancer, microbial infection, inflammation, and other disease conditions. However, their success in clinical trials has been less impressive, partly due to the compounds’ low bioavailability. The incorporation of nanoparticles into a delivery system for natural products would be a major advance in the efforts to increase their therapeutic effects. Recently, advances have been made showing that nanoparticles can significantly increase the bioavailability of natural products both in vitro and in vivo. Nanotechnology has demonstrated its capability to manipulate particles in order to target specific areas of the body and control the release of drugs. Although there are many benefits to applying nanotechnology for better delivery of natural products, it is not without issues. Drug targeting remains a challenge and potential nanoparticle toxicity needs to be further investigated, especially if these systems are to be used to treat chronic human diseases. This review aims to summarize recent progress in several key areas relevant to natural products in nanoparticle delivery systems for biomedical applications.

23 September 2017 in Biotechnology Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WHWei Huang
Wei Huang
Chenming ZhangChenming Zhang
Chenming Zhang

6 August 2004 in Biotechnology Progress
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TMTodd J. Menkhaus
Todd J. Menkhaus
YBYun Bai
Yun Bai
Chenming ZhangChenming Zhang
Chenming Zhang
ZNZivko L. Nikolov
Zivko L. Nikolov
CGCharles E. Glatz
Charles E. Glatz
The past 5 years have seen the commercialization of two recombinant protein products from transgenic plants, and many recombinant therapeutic proteins produced in plants are currently undergoing development. The emergence of plants as an alternative production host has brought new challenges and opportunities to downstream processing efforts. Plant hosts contain a unique set of matrix contaminants (proteins, oils, phenolic compounds, etc.) that must be removed during purification of the target protein. Furthermore, plant solids, which require early removal after extraction, are generally in higher concentration, wider in size range, and denser than traditional bacterial and mammalian cell culture debris. At the same time, there remains the desire to incorporate highly selective and integrative separation technologies (those capable of performing multiple tasks) during the purification process from plant material. The general plant processing and purification scheme consists of isolation of the plant tissue containing the recombinant protein, fractionation of the tissue along with particle size reduction, extraction of the target protein into an aqueous medium, clarification of the crude extract, and finally purification of the product. Each of these areas will be discussed here, focusing on what has been learned and where potential concerns remain. We also present details of how the choice of plant host, along with location within the plant for targeting the recombinant protein, can play an important role in the ultimate ease of recovery and the emergence of regulations governing plant hosts. Major emphasis is placed on three crops, canola, corn, and soy, with brief discussions of tobacco and rice.

1 August 2011 in Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBSomayesadat Badieyan
Somayesadat Badieyan
DBDavid R. Bevan
David R. Bevan
Chenming ZhangChenming Zhang
Chenming Zhang

1 December 2015 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YHYun Hu
Yun Hu
RHReece Hoerle
Reece Hoerle
MEMarion Ehrich
Marion Ehrich
Chenming ZhangChenming Zhang
Chenming Zhang

24 February 2020 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKyle Saylor
Kyle Saylor
FGFrank Gillam
Frank Gillam
TLTaylor Lohneis
Taylor Lohneis
Chenming ZhangChenming Zhang
Chenming Zhang
Today, vaccinologists have come to understand that the hallmark of any protective immune response is the antigen. However, it is not the whole antigen that dictates the immune response, but rather the various parts comprising the whole that are capable of influencing immunogenicity. Protein-based antigens hold particular importance within this structural approach to understanding immunity because, though different molecules can serve as antigens, only proteins are capable of inducing both cellular and humoral immunity. This fact, coupled with the versatility and customizability of proteins when considering vaccine design applications, makes protein-based vaccines (PBVs) one of today's most promising technologies for artificially inducing immunity. In this review, we follow the development of PBV technologies through time and discuss the antigen-specific receptors that are most critical to any immune response: pattern recognition receptors, B cell receptors, and T cell receptors. Knowledge of these receptors and their ligands has become exceptionally valuable in the field of vaccinology, where today it is possible to make drastic modifications to PBV structure, from primary to quaternary, in order to promote recognition of target epitopes, potentiate vaccine immunogenicity, and prevent antigen-associated complications. Additionally, these modifications have made it possible to control immune responses by modulating stability and targeting PBV to key immune cells. Consequently, careful consideration should be given to protein structure when designing PBVs in the future in order to potentiate PBV efficacy.