Ameesh Isath

Dr. Ameesh Isath

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 January 2021 in Journal of the American Heart Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VVVaibhav R. Vaidya
Vaibhav R. Vaidya
MLMelissa Lyle
Melissa Lyle
WMWilliam R. Miranda
William R. Miranda
MFMedhat Farwati
Medhat Farwati
AIAmeesh Isath
Ameesh Isath
RMRowlens M. Melduni
Rowlens M. Melduni
Background: The prognosis of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) remains elusive despite its recognition as a clinical entity for >30 years. We sought to identify clinical and imaging characteristics and risk factors for mortality in patients with LVNC. Methods and Results: 339 adults with LVNC seen between 2000 and 2016 were identified. LVNC was defined as end‐systolic noncompacted to compacted myocardial ratio >2 (Jenni criteria) and end‐diastolic trough of trabeculation‐to‐epicardium (X):peak of trabeculation‐to‐epicardium (Y) ratio 2.3 (Petersen criteria) by magnetic resonance imaging. Median age was 47.4 years, and 46% of patients were female. Left ventricular ejection fraction <50% was present in 57% of patients and isolated apical noncompaction in 48%. During a median follow‐up of 6.3 years, 59 patients died. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02–1.06), left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (HR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.17–4.80), and noncompaction extending from the apex to the mid or basal segments (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.21–3.68) were associated with all‐cause mortality. Compared with the expected survival for age‐ and sex‐matched US population, patients with LVNC had reduced overall survival ( P <0.001). However, patients with LVNC with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and patients with isolated apical noncompaction had similar survival to the general population. Conclusions: Overall survival is reduced in patients with LVNC compared with the expected survival of age‐ and sex‐matched US population. However, survival rate in those with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and isolated apical noncompaction was comparable with that of the general population.

26 August 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKlaudia J. Koziol
Klaudia J. Koziol
AIAmeesh Isath
Ameesh Isath
SRShiavax Rao
Shiavax Rao
VGVasiliki Gregory
Vasiliki Gregory
SOSuguru Ohira
Suguru Ohira
Chayakrit KrittanawongChayakrit Krittanawong
Chayakrit Krittanawong
Cardiogenic shock is a critical condition of low cardiac output resulting in insufficient systemic perfusion and end-organ dysfunction. Though significant advances have been achieved in reperfusion therapy and mechanical circulatory support, cardiogenic shock continues to be a life-threatening condition associated with a high rate of complications and excessively high patient mortality, reported to be between 35% and 50%. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can provide full cardiopulmonary support, has been increasingly used in the last two decades, and can be used to restore systemic end-organ hypoperfusion. However, a paucity of randomized controlled trials in combination with high complication and mortality rates suggest the need for more research to better define its efficacy, safety, and optimal patient selection. In this review, we provide an updated review on VA-ECMO, with an emphasis on its application in cardiogenic shock, including indications and contraindications, expected hemodynamic and echocardiographic findings, recommendations for weaning, complications, and outcomes. Furthermore, specific emphasis will be devoted to the two published randomized controlled trials recently presented in this setting.

2 August 2020 in Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AIAmeesh Isath
Ameesh Isath
DPDeepak Padmanabhan
Deepak Padmanabhan
SHSyed Waqas Haider
Syed Waqas Haider
GSGregory Siroky
Gregory Siroky
SPStuthi Perimbeti
Stuthi Perimbeti
DMDavendra Mehta
Davendra Mehta

25 October 2018 in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DPDeepak Padmanabhan
Deepak Padmanabhan
KKKrishna Kancharla
Krishna Kancharla
MEMajd A. El‐Harasis
Majd A. El‐Harasis
AIAmeesh Isath
Ameesh Isath
NMNayani Makkar
Nayani Makkar
SKSuraj Kapa
Suraj Kapa

16 December 2022 in Current Problems in Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AIAmeesh Isath
Ameesh Isath
AMAaqib Malik
Aaqib Malik
DBDhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay
Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay
AGAkshay Goel
Akshay Goel
AHAdrija Hajra
Adrija Hajra
AGAlan L. Gass
Alan L. Gass

11 June 2020 in Journal of Arrhythmia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AIAmeesh Isath
Ameesh Isath
ACAshish Correa
Ashish Correa
GSGregory P. Siroky
Gregory P. Siroky
SPStuthi Perimbeti
Stuthi Perimbeti
SMSelma Mohammed
Selma Mohammed
DMDavendra Mehta
Davendra Mehta
Background: Patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) have increased mortality, which can be explained in part by an increased risk of arrhythmias. The burden of arrhythmias in CA, their predictors, and impact on in‐hospital outcomes remains unclear. The role of implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICD) in this population is also uncertain.Methods: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) using ICD‐9‐CM codes 277.39 and 425.7 to identify CA. Twelve common arrhythmias were extracted using appropriate, validated ICD‐9‐CM codes. ICD implantation was identified using procedure ICD‐9 codes 37.94 to 37.98, 00.51 and 00.54.Results: There were a total of 145,920 CA hospitalizations between 1999 and 2014 in the United States and 56,199 (38.5%) of them were associated with arrhythmias. The prevalence of arrhythmias remained relatively constant from 41.5% in 1999 to 40.2% in 2014. The most common arrhythmia was atrial fibrillation (25.4%). In‐patient mortality was significantly higher in CA patients with arrhythmias (10.4% vs 6.5%, P < .001). ICD implantation was performed in 1,381 (0.94%) patients with CA and analysis revealed an incremental trend in implantation over the study period (0.48% in 1999 to 0.65% in 2014). In‐hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients who underwent ICD implantation (3.7% vs 8%; P = .0078). CA patients with arrhythmias also had an increased cost of hospitalization and length of stay ($65,046 ± 1,079 vs $53,322 ± 687 and 8.3 ± 0.1 vs 7.4 ± 0.1 days, respectively; P < .0001).Conclusion: Cardiac arrhythmias are common in patients with CA and are associated with worse in‐hospital outcomes, increased length of stay, and cost of hospitalization.