Dusanka Obradovic

Prof. Dr. Dusanka Obradovic

Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine , Novi Sad University, Novi Sad, Serbia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2018 in The Lancet Global Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AVAnn Versporten
Ann Versporten
PZPeter Zarb
Peter Zarb
ICIsabelle Caniaux
Isabelle Caniaux
MGMarie-Françoise Gros
Marie-Françoise Gros
NDNico Drapier
Nico Drapier
SMSuzanne May
Suzanne May
The Global Point Prevalence Survey (Global-PPS) established an international network of hospitals to measure antimicrobial prescribing and resistance worldwide. We aimed to assess antimicrobial prescribing and resistance in hospital inpatients. We used a standardised surveillance method to collect detailed data about antimicrobial prescribing and resistance from hospitals worldwide, which were grouped by UN region. The internet-based survey included all inpatients (adults, children, and neonates) receiving an antimicrobial who were on the ward at 0800 h on one specific day between January and September, 2015. Hospitals were classified as primary, secondary, tertiary (including infectious diseases hospitals), and paediatric hospitals. Five main ward types were defined: medical wards, surgical wards, intensive-care units, haematology oncology wards, and medical transplantation (bone marrow or solid transplants) wards. Data recorded included patient characteristics, antimicrobials received, diagnosis, therapeutic indication according to predefined lists, and markers of prescribing quality (eg, whether a stop or review date were recorded, and whether local prescribing guidelines existed and were adhered to). We report findings for adult inpatients. The Global-PPS for 2015 included adult data from 303 hospitals in 53 countries, including eight lower-middle-income and 17 upper-middle-income countries. 86 776 inpatients were admitted to 3315 adult wards, of whom 29 891 (34·4%) received at least one antimicrobial. 41 213 antimicrobial prescriptions were issued, of which 36 792 (89·3%) were antibacterial agents for systemic use. The top three antibiotics prescribed worldwide were penicillins with β-lactamase inhibitors, third-generation cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones. Carbapenems were most frequently prescribed in Latin America and west and central Asia. Of patients who received at least one antimicrobial, 5926 (19·8%) received a targeted antibacterial treatment for systemic use, and 1769 (5·9%) received a treatment targeting at least one multidrug-resistant organism. The frequency of health-care-associated infections was highest in Latin America (1518 [11·9%]) and east and south Asia (5363 [10·1%]). Overall, the reason for treatment was recorded in 31 694 (76·9%) of antimicrobial prescriptions, and a stop or review date in 15 778 (38·3%). Local antibiotic guidelines were missing for 7050 (19·2%) of the 36 792 antibiotic prescriptions, and guideline compliance was 77·4%. The Global-PPS showed that worldwide surveillance can be accomplished with voluntary participation. It provided quantifiable measures to assess and compare the quantity and quality of antibiotic prescribing and resistance in hospital patients worldwide. These data will help to improve the quality of antibiotic prescribing through education and practice changes, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries that have no tools to monitor antibiotic prescribing in hospitals. bioMérieux.

1 June 2018 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJames D. Chalmers
James D. Chalmers
SAStefano Aliberti
Stefano Aliberti
AFAnna Filonenko
Anna Filonenko
MSMichal Shteinberg
Michal Shteinberg
PGPieter C. Goeminne
Pieter C. Goeminne
MMMelissa J. McDonnell
Melissa J. McDonnell
Rationale: Exacerbations are key events in the natural history of bronchiectasis, but clinical predictors and outcomes of patients with frequently exacerbating disease are not well described. Objectives: To establish if there is a “frequent exacerbator phenotype” in bronchiectasis and the impact of exacerbations on long-term clinical outcomes. Methods: We studied patients with bronchiectasis enrolled from 10 clinical centers in Europe and Israel, with up to 5 years of follow-up. Patients were categorized by baseline exacerbation frequency (zero, one, two, or three or more per year). The repeatability of exacerbation status was assessed, as well as the independent impact of exacerbation history on hospitalizations, quality of life, and mortality. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 2,572 patients were included. Frequent exacerbations were the strongest predictor of future exacerbation frequency, suggesting a consistent phenotype. The incident rate ratios for future exacerbations were 1.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47–2.02; P < 0.0001) for one exacerbation per year, 3.14 (95% CI, 2.70–3.66; P < 0.0001) for two exacerbations, and 5.97 (95% CI, 5.27–6.78; P < 0.0001) for patients with three or more exacerbations per year at baseline. Additional independent predictors of future exacerbation frequency were Haemophilus influenzae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, FEV1, radiological severity of disease, and coexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patients with frequently exacerbating disease had worse quality of life and were more likely to be hospitalized during follow-up. Mortality over up to 5 years of follow-up increased with increasing exacerbation frequency. Conclusions: The frequent exacerbator phenotype in bronchiectasis is consistent over time and shows high disease severity, poor quality of life, and increased mortality during follow-up.

1 December 2016 in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMelissa J McDonnell
Melissa J McDonnell
SAStefano Aliberti
Stefano Aliberti
PGPieter C Goeminne
Pieter C Goeminne
MRMarcos I Restrepo
Marcos I Restrepo
SFSimon Finch
Simon Finch
JCJames D Chalmers
James D Chalmers
Patients with bronchiectasis often have concurrent comorbidities, but the nature, prevalence, and impact of these comorbidities on disease severity and outcome are poorly understood. We aimed to investigate comorbidities in patients with bronchiectasis and establish their prognostic value on disease severity and mortality rate. An international multicentre cohort analysis of outpatients with bronchiectasis from four European centres followed up for 5 years was done for score derivation. Eligible patients were those with bronchiectasis confirmed by high-resolution CT and a compatible clinical history. Comorbidity diagnoses were based on standardised definitions and were obtained from full review of paper and electronic medical records, prescriptions, and investigator definitions. Weibull parametric survival analysis was used to model the prediction of the 5 year mortality rate to construct the Bronchiectasis Aetiology Comorbidity Index (BACI). We tested the BACI as a predictor of outcomes and explored whether the BACI added further prognostic information when used alongside the Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI). The BACI was validated in two independent international cohorts from the UK and Serbia. Between June 1, 2006, and Nov 22, 2013, 1340 patients with bronchiectasis were screened and 986 patients were analysed. Patients had a median of four comorbidities (IQR 2-6; range 0-20). 13 comorbidities independently predicting mortality rate were integrated into the BACI. The overall hazard ratio for death conferred by a one-point increase in the BACI was 1·18 (95% CI 1·14-1·23; p<0·0001). The BACI predicted 5 year mortality rate, hospital admissions, exacerbations, and health-related quality of life across all BSI risk strata (p<0·0001 for mortality and hospital admissions, p=0·03 for exacerbations, p=0·0008 for quality of life). When used in conjunction with the BSI, the combined model was superior to either model alone (p=0·01 for combined vs BACI; p=0·008 for combined vs BSI). Multimorbidity is frequent in bronchiectasis and can negatively affect survival. The BACI complements the BSI in the assessment and prediction of mortality and disease outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis. European Bronchiectasis Network (EMBARC).

31 January 2018 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADavid Araújo
David Araújo
MSMichal Shteinberg
Michal Shteinberg
SAStefano Aliberti
Stefano Aliberti
PGPieter C. Goeminne
Pieter C. Goeminne
AHAdam T. Hill
Adam T. Hill
JCJames D. Chalmers
James D. Chalmers
Pseudomonas aeruginosais responsible for chronic infection in many bronchiectasis patients but it is not known whether it is associated with worse clinical outcomes independent of the underlying severity of disease.This study analysed data from 2596 bronchiectasis patients included from 10 different bronchiectasis clinical centres across Europe and Israel, with a 5-year follow-up period. Prevalence ofP. aeruginosachronic infection and its independent impact on exacerbations, hospitalisations, quality of life and mortality was assessed.The prevalence ofP. aeruginosachronic infection was 15.0% (n=389).P. aeruginosawas associated with a higher mortality in a univariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR) 2.02; 95% (confidence interval) CI 1.53–2.66; p<0.0001) but an independent impact on mortality was not found in a multivariate analysis (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.70–1.36; p=0.89).P. aeruginosawas independently associated with increased mortality only in patients with frequent exacerbations (two or more per year) (HR 2.03; 95% CI 1.36–3.03; p=0.001). An independent association with worse quality of life of 7.46 points (95% CI 2.93–12.00; p=0.001) was found in a multivariable linear regression.P. aeruginosawas therefore found to be independently associated with exacerbation frequency, hospital admissions and worse quality of life. Mortality was increased in patients withP. aeruginosaparticularly in the presence of frequent exacerbations.

11 August 2016 in Thorax
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMM J McDonnell
M J McDonnell
SAStefano Aliberti
Stefano Aliberti
PGP C Goeminne
P C Goeminne
KDK Dimakou
K Dimakou
SZS C Zucchetti
S C Zucchetti
JCJ D Chalmers
J D Chalmers
Introduction Bronchiectasis is a multidimensional disease associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Two disease-specific clinical prediction tools have been developed, the Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI) and the FACED score, both of which stratify patients into severity risk categories to predict the probability of mortality. Methods We aimed to compare the predictive utility of BSI and FACED in assessing clinically relevant disease outcomes across seven European cohorts independent of their original validation studies. Results The combined cohorts totalled 1612. Pooled analysis showed that both scores had a good discriminatory predictive value for mortality (pooled area under the curve (AUC) 0.76, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.78 for both scores) with the BSI demonstrating a higher sensitivity (65% vs 28%) but lower specificity (70% vs 93%) compared with the FACED score. Calibration analysis suggested that the BSI performed consistently well across all cohorts, while FACED consistently overestimated mortality in ‘severe’ patients (pooled OR 0.33 (0.23 to 0.48), p<0.0001). The BSI accurately predicted hospitalisations (pooled AUC 0.82, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.84), exacerbations, quality of life (QoL) and respiratory symptoms across all risk categories. FACED had poor discrimination for hospital admissions (pooled AUC 0.65, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.67) with low sensitivity at 16% and did not consistently predict future risk of exacerbations, QoL or respiratory symptoms. No association was observed with FACED and 6 min walk distance (6MWD) or lung function decline. Conclusion The BSI accurately predicts mortality, hospital admissions, exacerbations, QoL, respiratory symptoms, 6MWD and lung function decline in bronchiectasis, providing a clinically relevant evaluation of disease severity.

14 December 2017 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADavid Araújo
David Araújo
MSMichal Shteinberg
Michal Shteinberg
SAStefano Aliberti
Stefano Aliberti
PGPieter C. Goeminne
Pieter C. Goeminne
AHAdam T. Hill
Adam T. Hill
JCJames D. Chalmers
James D. Chalmers
The use of a standardised aetiological algorithm in bronchiectasis can improve the diagnosis of underlying causehttp://ow.ly/5dga30gxrq3