Shruti V Kabadi

Dr. Shruti V Kabadi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2022 in Toxics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XCXiaoqing Chang
Xiaoqing Chang
CTCecilia Tan
Cecilia Tan
DADavid G. Allen
David G. Allen
SBShannon Bell
Shannon Bell
PBPaul C. Brown
Paul C. Brown
M. Moiz MumtazM. Moiz Mumtaz
M. Moiz Mumtaz
During the past few decades, the science of toxicology has been undergoing a transformation from observational to predictive science. New approach methodologies (NAMs), including in vitro assays, in silico models, read-across, and in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE), are being developed to reduce, refine, or replace whole animal testing, encouraging the judicious use of time and resources. Some of these methods have advanced past the exploratory research stage and are beginning to gain acceptance for the risk assessment of chemicals. A review of the recent literature reveals a burst of IVIVE publications over the past decade. In this review, we propose operational definitions for IVIVE, present literature examples for several common toxicity endpoints, and highlight their implications in decision-making processes across various federal agencies, as well as international organizations, including those in the European Union (EU). The current challenges and future needs are also summarized for IVIVE. In addition to refining and reducing the number of animals in traditional toxicity testing protocols and being used for prioritizing chemical testing, the goal to use IVIVE to facilitate the replacement of animal models can be achieved through their continued evolution and development, including a strategic plan to qualify IVIVE methods for regulatory acceptance.

1 February 2018 in Food and Chemical Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKShruti V Kabadi
Shruti V Kabadi
JFJeffrey Fisher
Jeffrey Fisher
JAJason Aungst
Jason Aungst
PRPenelope Rice
Penelope Rice

1 February 2020 in Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKShruti V Kabadi
Shruti V Kabadi
JFJeffrey W. Fisher
Jeffrey W. Fisher
DDDaniel R. Doerge
Daniel R. Doerge
DMDarshan Mehta
Darshan Mehta
JAJason Aungst
Jason Aungst
PRPenelope Rice
Penelope Rice

1 November 2019 in Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKShruti V Kabadi
Shruti V Kabadi
YZYu Zang
Yu Zang
JFJeffrey W. Fisher
Jeffrey W. Fisher
NSNikki Smith
Nikki Smith
CWCatherine Whiteside
Catherine Whiteside
JAJason Aungst
Jason Aungst

20 December 2022 in Biomolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKShruti V Kabadi
Shruti V Kabadi
JFJeffrey Fisher
Jeffrey Fisher
BHBenjamin Hung
Benjamin Hung
JAJason Aungst
Jason Aungst
The safety evaluation of oral exposure to substances, such as food ingredients, additives, and their constituents, relies primarily on a careful evaluation and analysis of data from oral toxicity studies. When relevant oral toxicity studies are unavailable or may have significant data gaps that make them inadequate for use in safety evaluations, data from non-oral toxicity studies in animals, such as studies on inhalation, dermal exposure, etc., might be used in support of or in place of oral toxicity studies through route-to-route (R-t-R) extrapolation. R-t-R extrapolation is applied on a case-by-case basis as it requires attention to and comparison of substance-specific toxicokinetic (TK) and toxicodynamic (TD) data for oral and non-oral exposure routes. This article provides a commentary on the utility of R-t-R extrapolation to assess the safety of oral exposure to substances, with an emphasis on the relevance of TK and systemic toxicity data.