Article: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy with the novel HUGO™ RAS System: feasibility, setting, and perioperative outcomes - Minerva Urology and Nephrology 2022 Sep 12 - Minerva Medica - Journals

Introduction and Hypothesis: Robotic sacropexy (RSC) emerged in the last years as a valid alternative to the laparoscopic technique. However, the robotic approach is still limited by platform availability and concerns about cost-effectiveness. Recently, new robotic platforms joined the market, lowering the costs and offering the possibility to expand the robotic approach. The aim of our study was to demonstrate the technical feasibility and safety of the procedure with this new platform along with the description of our surgical setting. Materials and Methods: We reported data on the first five consecutive patients who underwent RSC at Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital (Aalst, Belgium), performed with the novel HUGO™ Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System. The platform consists of four fully independent carts, an open console, and a system tower equipped for both laparoscopic and robotic surgery. We collected patients' characteristics, intraoperative data, intraoperative complications, and clashes of instruments. Results: All procedures were completed according to the same surgical setting and technique. No need for conversion to open/laparoscopic surgery and/or for additional port placement was required. No intraoperative complications, instrument clashes, or system failure that compromised the surgery's completion were recorded. Median interquartile range docking, operative, and console time were 8 (6–9), 130 (115–165), and 80 (80–115) minutes, respectively. Conclusion: This series represents the first worldwide report of a robot-assisted sacropexy executed with the novel HUGO RAS System. Awaiting future investigation, this preliminary experience provides relevant data in terms of operative room settings and perioperative outcomes that might be helpful for future adopters of this platform.

Introduction and objectives Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP) and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) are both well-established, minimally-invasive surgical treatment options for lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic enlargement. We have reported the first comparative analysis of both techniques in patients with prostates of 200ml. Materials & methods Between 2009 and 2020 a total of 53 patients with a prostate volume of 200ml were surgically treated at OLV Hospital Aalst (Belgium): 31 underwent RASP and 22 underwent HoLEP. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included uroflowmetry with maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual volume (PVR), as well as the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (IPSS-QoL). The complication rates were evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification. Results Patients treated with RASP had significantly larger prostate volumes compared to HoLEP (median 226 vs. 204.5 ml, p=0.004). After a median follow-up of 14 months, both groups showed a significant improvement in the maximum flow rate (+10.60 vs. +10.70 ml/s, p=0.724) and a reduction of the IPSS score (-12.50 vs. -9, p=0.246) as well as improvement of the QoL (-3 vs. -3, p=0.880). Median operative time was similar in both groups (150 vs. 132.5 min, p=0.665). The amount of resected tissue was lower in the RASP group (134.5 vs. 180 g, p=0.029) and there was no significant difference in postoperative PSA (1.2 vs. 0.8 ng/ml, p=0,112). Despite a similar median catheterization time (3 vs. 2 days, p=0.748), the median hospitalization time was shorter in the HoLEP group (4 vs. 3 days, p=0.052). Complication rates were similar in both groups (32% vs. 36%, p=0.987). Conclusion Our results suggest similar outcomes for RASP and HoLEP in patients with very large prostates 200ml. These findings will require external validation at other high-volume centers.

Background: In robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) renorrhaphy is used to achieve hemostatic control of the tumoral resection bed, with detrimental impact on renal function. Hemostatic agents are used to achieve rapid and optimal hemostasis. GATT-Patch is a new hemostatic sealant that has already demonstrated promising results. Objective: Compare GATT-Patch and standard renorrhaphy in terms of hemostatic capacity, ischemia time, and prevention of urinary leakage after RAPN in a porcine model. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this preclinical randomized controlled trial, four pigs underwent 32 RAPNs. After resection, GATT-Patch application and performance of classic renorrhaphy were randomized. After the procedure, the resection bed was reinspected. A necropsy study evaluated the adhesiveness of the patch, and retrograde pyelography was performed to determine the leakage burst pressure. Intervention: Application of GATT-Patch and performance of classic renorrhaphy were randomized and surgeons blinded to the hemostatic technique to be performed. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Warm ischemia, hemostatic control, active bleeding during hemostatic control, total procedure time, bleeding at reinspection, and presence of urinary leakage on retrograde pyelography were recorded. Continuous variables were compared using the Student t -test. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Results and Limitations: GATT-Patch reduced warm ischemia time (WIT), time to achieve hemostatic control, active bleeding time, and total procedure time, achieving hemostasis in 100% of the cases. Rebleeding at reinspection occurred in 0% of the GATT-Patch group. Renal parenchyma damage was observed in 100% of renorrhaphy cases and in 0% of GATT-Patch cases. Conclusions: GATT-Patch guaranteed optimal hemostasis and urine sealant effect after RAPN in porcine models. Compared to renorrhaphy, we observed a reduction in WIT, total procedure time, and potential reduction in healthy parenchyma loss. Patient Summary: GATT-Patch stops bleeding and provides hemostasis faster than suturing after resection of portions of the kidney in pigs. It might be tested in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for kidney cancer.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this article is to present a single-surgeon, open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) series for testicular cancer in a high-volume center. Materials and Methods: We reviewed data from patients who underwent RPLND performed by an experienced surgeon at our institution between 2000 and 2019. We evaluated surgical and perioperative outcomes, complications, Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS), Overall Survival (OS), and Cancer-Specific Survival (CSS). Results: RPLND was performed in primary and secondary settings in 21 (32%) and 44 (68%) patients, respectively. Median operative time was 180 min. Median hospital stay was 6 days. Complications occurred in 23 (35%) patients, with 9 (14%) events reported as Clavien grade ≥ 3. Patients in the primary RPLND group were significantly younger, more likely to have NSGCT, had higher clinical N0 and M0, and had higher nerve-sparing RPLND (all p ≤ 0.04) compared to those in the secondary RPLND group. In the median follow-up of 120 (56–180) months, 10 (15%) patients experienced recurrence. Finally, 20-year OS, CSS, and RFS were 89%, 92%, and 85%, respectively, with no significant difference in survival rates between primary vs. secondary RPLND subgroups (p = 0.64, p = 0.7, and p = 0.31, respectively). Conclusions: Open RPLND performed by an experienced high-volume surgeon achieves excellent oncological and functional outcomes supporting the centralization of these complex procedures.

The Central European Journal of Urology is an open access quarterly-issued journal, which provides a forum for the presentation of original clinical, experimental and other research studies...