Milan Stanko

Dr. Milan Stanko

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 March 2022 in Upstream Oil and Gas Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMuhammad Gibran Alfarizi
Muhammad Gibran Alfarizi
MSMilan Stanko
Milan Stanko
TBTimur Bikmukhametov
Timur Bikmukhametov

1 July 2021 in Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CVCleide Vieira
Cleide Vieira
MSMilan Stanko
Milan Stanko
TOTomáš Oplt
Tomáš Oplt

15 June 2024 in Chemical Engineering Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMoein Assar
Moein Assar
HAHamidreza Asaadian
Hamidreza Asaadian
MSMilan Stanko
Milan Stanko
BGBrian Arthur Grimes
Brian Arthur Grimes

4 December 2019 in Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDiana González
Diana González
MSMilan Stanko
Milan Stanko
AHArnaud Hoffmann
Arnaud Hoffmann
This paper presents the development of a method to provide decision support in the feasibility studies and concept planning phases of oil and gas field development. The objective in developing the methodology was to provide an easy-to-use facility to integrate the production-governing elements of oil and gas fields that capture the integrated production and economic performance of the system. This in a modular and scalable manner includes numerical optimization and uncertainty analyses needed to support engineering decisions. The method follows a series of steps that allow determining the optimal field production profile, drilling schedule, type of offshore structure, pressure support method and selection of artificial lift. The first step consists of creating efficient (low running time) proxy models of the production performance of the field and the costs figures associated with the project. The proxy model of the production performance is based on curves of maximum production rates versus cumulative production and contains all relevant field design features and computation of the most relevant performance indicators to consider in the evaluation. The proxy model to estimate the costs associated with the project is based on linear equations function of production rates and number of wells. The second step is to perform numerical optimization to find optimal production profile and drilling schedule that maximize the net present value of the specific development strategies considered. For the last step, an evaluation of the effect of uncertainties on the results of the numerical optimization using probabilistic methods is performed. The method was applied in a synthetic production system based on public data of Wisting field (currently under development). The field is a remote low-energy oil reservoir located in the Barents Sea. Nine strategies, obtained from the combination of three recovery support methods and three processing facilities, were compared using the net present value as decision factor. The best strategy consists of using a tension leg platform as processing facility and multiphase boosting plus water injection as recovery support method. This strategy generated the highest production and required the lowest costs, resulting in the highest profitability. It was demonstrated that the methodology successfully finds optimal field design features while quantifying the effect of uncertainties.

28 July 2022 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAndres Pinilla
Andres Pinilla
MSMilan Stanko
Milan Stanko
MAMiguel Asuaje
Miguel Asuaje
NRNicolas Ratkovich
Nicolas Ratkovich
The rate-controlled production (RCP) inflow control devices (ICDs) are valves placed in the lower completion of oil and gas wells, capable of autonomously controlling the reservoir inflow. This completion technology self-regulates the inflow of undesired phases, such as water, by choking the flow after the breakthrough event, thus improving the recovery factor and reducing water production. In this context, this article presents a numerical study that describes the working principle of RCP valves based on a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. The numerical models are based on the conservation equations of fluid flow, the volume of fluid (VOF) multiphase flow model, and the dynamic fluid body interaction (DFBI) model to simulate the valve’s movement caused by its interaction with the flow. This study demonstrates the possibility of studying RCP valves alone or coupled with the whole completion assembly and reservoir rock. The difference in the valve efficiency after considering the entire completion assembly and reservoir rock is 19% less compared with the stand-alone analysis of the valve. Finally, this study provides a deep understanding of the fluid dynamics near the wellbore, the completion assembly, and the RCP valves, along with its chocking, which could be helpful to future researchers interested in improving multiphase flow efficiency in subsurface processes.

16 July 2022 in Computers & Chemical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GLGuowen Lei
Guowen Lei
MSMilan Stanko
Milan Stanko
TSThiago Lima Silva
Thiago Lima Silva