Colby Ayers

Mr. Colby Ayers


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2014 in Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMChristopher D Maroules
Christopher D Maroules
AKAmit Khera
Amit Khera
CAColby Ayers
Colby Ayers
AGAkshay Goel
Akshay Goel
RPRonald M Peshock
Ronald M Peshock
KKKevin King
Kevin King
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been validated for the noninvasive assessment of total arterial compliance and aortic stiffness, but their associations with cardiovascular outcomes is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations of CMR measures of total arterial compliance and two CMR measures of aortic stiffness with respect to future cardiovascular events.

1 September 2014 in Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Tiffany M.  Powell-WileyTiffany M. Powell-Wiley
Tiffany M. Powell-Wiley
CAColby Ayers
Colby Ayers
PAPriscilla Agyemang
Priscilla Agyemang
TLTammy Leonard
Tammy Leonard
David BerriganDavid Berrigan
David Berrigan
CHChristine M. Hoehner
Christine M. Hoehner

1 May 2022 in Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAnna G. Rosenblatt
Anna G. Rosenblatt
CAColby Ayers
Colby Ayers
ARAnjali Rao
Anjali Rao
SHStacey J. Howell
Stacey J. Howell
NHNicholas S. Hendren
Nicholas S. Hendren
SDSandeep R. Das
Sandeep R. Das
Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 has been reported and associated with poor clinical outcomes. We aimed to understand the incidence of and outcomes associated with new-onset AF in a diverse and representative US cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Methods: We used data from the American Heart Association COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease Registry. Patients were stratified by the presence versus absence of new-onset AF. The primary and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiogenic shock, and heart failure). The association of new-onset AF and the primary and secondary outcomes was evaluated using Cox proportional-hazards models for the primary time to event analyses. Results: Of the first 30 999 patients from 120 institutions across the United States hospitalized with COVID-19, 27 851 had no history of AF. One thousand five hundred seventeen (5.4%) developed new-onset AF during their index hospitalization. New-onset AF was associated with higher rates of death (45.2% versus 11.9%) and MACE (23.8% versus 6.5%). The unadjusted hazard ratio for mortality was 1.99 (95% CI, 1.81–2.18) and for MACE was 2.23 (95% CI, 1.98–2.53) for patients with versus without new-onset AF. After adjusting for demographics, clinical comorbidities, and severity of disease, the associations with death (hazard ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.99–1.23]) fully attenuated and MACE (hazard ratio, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.14–1.50]) partially attenuated. Conclusions: New-onset AF was common (5.4%) among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Almost half of patients with new-onset AF died during their index hospitalization. After multivariable adjustment for comorbidities and disease severity, new-onset AF was not statistically significantly associated with death, suggesting that new-onset AF in these patients may primarily be a marker of other adverse clinical factors rather than an independent driver of mortality. Causality between the MACE composites and AF needs to be further evaluated.

7 January 2019 in BMC Medical Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMelanie S. Sulistio
Melanie S. Sulistio
AKAmit Khera
Amit Khera
KSKathryn Squiers
Kathryn Squiers
MSMonika Sanghavi
Monika Sanghavi
CAColby Ayers
Colby Ayers
LKLynne Kirk
Lynne Kirk
Though the proportion of female Internal Medicine (IM) residents and faculty has increased, there is minimal large scale modern data comparing resident performance by gender. This study sought to examine the effects of resident and faculty gender on resident evaluations. Retrospective observational study over 5 years in a single IM program. IM certifying examination pass rates were obtained from the American Board of IM. Four hundred eighty-eight residents (195 women, 293 men), evaluated by 430 attending physicians (163 women, 270 men) were included. Twelve thousand six hundred eighty-one evaluations between 2007 and 2012 were analyzed. Female residents scored higher in two domains (Medical Interviewing, and Interpersonal and Communication Skills) (p < 0.01 for each), with no significant difference between genders for the other domains (Medical Knowledge, Overall Patient Care, Physical Examination, Procedural Skills, Professionalism, Practice Based Learning and Improvement, System Based Practices and Overall score). There were no differences in scoring between female and male attending physicians. There were no differences in certifying examination scores between women and men among graduating residents. National pass rates for women were not statistically different to pass rates for men from 1987 to 2015. Data from one large academic medical center demonstrate higher ratings for female residents on performance domains reflecting bedside care and interpersonal skills, with similar scores for medical knowledge and remaining domains. No significant difference was seen locally in certifying examination scores, nor in recent national pass rates, an objective measure of medical knowledge. Despite imbalanced female representation in areas of medicine, our data suggest that gender-based disparities in Internal Medicine resident medical knowledge and physician competency are no longer present.

16 April 2015 in Vascular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JKJacquelyn Kulinski
Jacquelyn Kulinski
MSMonika Sanghavi
Monika Sanghavi
CAColby Ayers
Colby Ayers
SDSandeep R Das
Sandeep R Das
SBSubhash Banerjee
Subhash Banerjee
DKDharam Kumbhani
Dharam Kumbhani
Sedentary behavior is an adverse health risk factor that is independent of physical activity. The relationship between sedentary behavior, exercise activity and the ankle-brachial index (ABI) is not well understood. We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2004. Accelerometer data were used to quantify exercise and sedentary time for each participant. A low ABI was defined as a value <1.0 (including borderline values). Multi-variable adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed with sedentary and exercise times as independent variables, adjusting for important confounders. There were 1443 asymptomatic participants (mean age 61 years, 49% female, 55% current/prior smokers) with mean daily sedentary and exercise times of 454±144 and 18±20 minutes, respectively. Of the participants, 23% had an ABI <1.0 (8.7% with ABI <0.9). Sedentary time was positively associated with a low ABI (odds ratio [OR] 1.22 per 1 standard deviation [SD], [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03–1.43]; p=0.02) while exercise time was inversely associated with a low ABI (OR 0.71 per 1 SD, [95% CI, 0.57–0.89]; p=0.003). Sedentary time is associated with low ABI values in the asymptomatic population. This association appears to be independent of exercise time and warrants further investigation.

JAJoel Adu-Brimpong
Joel Adu-Brimpong
NCNathan Coffey
Nathan Coffey
CAColby Ayers
Colby Ayers
David BerriganDavid Berrigan
David Berrigan
LYLeah R. Yingling
Leah R. Yingling
Tiffany M.  Powell-WileyTiffany M. Powell-Wiley
Tiffany M. Powell-Wiley
Optimization of existing measurement tools is necessary to explore links between aspects of the neighborhood built environment and health behaviors or outcomes. We evaluate a scoring method for virtual neighborhood audits utilizing the Active Neighborhood Checklist (the Checklist), a neighborhood audit measure, and assess street segment representativeness in low-income neighborhoods. Eighty-two home neighborhoods of Washington, D.C. Cardiovascular Health/Needs Assessment (NCT01927783) participants were audited using Google Street View imagery and the Checklist (five sections with 89 total questions). Twelve street segments per home address were assessed for (1) Land-Use Type; (2) Public Transportation Availability; (3) Street Characteristics; (4) Environment Quality and (5) Sidewalks/Walking/Biking features. Checklist items were scored 0–2 points/question. A combinations algorithm was developed to assess street segments’ representativeness. Spearman correlations were calculated between built environment quality scores and Walk Score®, a validated neighborhood walkability measure. Street segment quality scores ranged 10–47 (Mean = 29.4 ± 6.9) and overall neighborhood quality scores, 172–475 (Mean = 352.3 ± 63.6). Walk scores® ranged 0–91 (Mean = 46.7 ± 26.3). Street segment combinations’ correlation coefficients ranged 0.75–1.0. Significant positive correlations were found between overall neighborhood quality scores, four of the five Checklist subsection scores, and Walk Scores® (r = 0.62, p < 0.001). This scoring method adequately captures neighborhood features in low-income, residential areas and may aid in delineating impact of specific built environment features on health behaviors and outcomes.