Several mechanisms have been proposed that control the amount of plasticity in neuronal circuits and guarantee dynamic stability of neuronal networks. Homeostatic plasticity suggests that the ease with which a synaptic connection is facilitated/suppressed depends on the previous amount of network activity. We describe how such homeostatic-like interactions depend on the time interval between two conditioning protocols and on the duration of the preconditioning protocol. We used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to produce short-lasting plasticity in the motor cortex of healthy humans. In the main experiment, we compared the aftereffect of a single 5-min session of anodal or cathodal tDCS with the effect of a 5-min tDCS session preceded by an identical 5-min conditioning session administered 30, 3, or 0 min beforehand. Five-minute anodal tDCS increases excitability for about 5 min. The same duration of cathodal tDCS reduces excitability. Increasing the duration of tDCS to 10 min prolongs the duration of the effects. If two 5-min periods of tDCS are applied with a 30-min break between them, the effect of the second period of tDCS is identical to that of 5-min stimulation alone. If the break is only 3 min, then the second session has the opposite effect to 5-min tDCS given alone. Control experiments show that these shifts in the direction of plasticity evolve during the 10 min after the first tDCS session and depend on the duration of the first tDCS but not on intracortical inhibition and facilitation. The results are compatible with a time-dependent “homeostatic-like” rule governing the response of the human motor cortex to plasticity probing protocols.
The neuromodulator dopamine (DA) has multiple modes of action on neuroplasticity induction and modulation, depending on subreceptor specificity, concentration level, and the kind of stimulation-induced plasticity. To determine the dosage-dependent effects of D2-like receptor activation on nonfocal and focal neuroplasticity in the human motor cortex, different doses of ropinirole (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg), a D2/D3dopamine agonist, or placebo medication were combined with anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocols, which induce nonfocal plasticity, or paired associative stimulation (PAS, ISI of 10 or 25 ms), which generates focal plasticity, in healthy volunteers. D2-like receptor activation produced an inverted “U”-shaped dose–response curve on plasticity for facilitatory tDCS and PAS and for inhibitory tDCS. Here, high or low dosages of ropinirole impaired plasticity. However, no dose-dependent response effect of D2-like receptor activation was evident for focal inhibitory plasticity. In general, our study supports the assumption that modulation of D2-like receptor activity exerts dose-dependent inhibitory or facilitatory effects on neuroplasticity in the human motor cortex depending on the topographic specificity of plasticity.
Motor learning and memory consolidation require the contribution of different cortices. For motor sequence learning, the primary motor cortex is involved primarily in its acquisition. Premotor areas might be important for consolidation. In accordance, modulation of cortical excitability via transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS) during learning affects performance when applied to the primary motor cortex, but not premotor cortex. We aimed to explore whether premotor tDCS influences task performance during motor memory consolidation. The impact of excitability-enhancing, -diminishing, or placebo premotor tDCS during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep on recall in the serial reaction time task (SRTT) was explored in healthy humans. The motor task was learned in the evening. Recall was performed immediately after tDCS or the following morning. In two separate control experiments, excitability-enhancing premotor tDCS was performed 4 h after task learning during daytime or immediately before conduction of a simple reaction time task. Excitability-enhancing tDCS performed during REM sleep increased recall of the learned movement sequences, when tested immediately after stimulation. REM density was enhanced by excitability-increasing tDCS and reduced by inhibitory tDCS, but did not correlate with task performance. In the control experiments, tDCS did not improve performance. We conclude that the premotor cortex is involved in motor memory consolidation during REM sleep.
Dopamine is one of the major neuromodulators in the CNS, which is involved in learning and memory processes. A nonlinear, inverted U-shaped dose–response curve of its effects on cognition has been observed in animal studies. The basis for this nonlinear effect might be a similar effect of dopamine on neuroplasticity. Whereas it has been shown that dopamine affects paired associative stimulation (PAS)-induced plasticity, which might reflect learning-related processes to a larger degree than other noninvasive plasticity induction protocols in the human motor cortex in principle, its dose-dependency has not been explored previously. We studied the effect of different dosages of the dopamine precursorl-DOPA on motor cortex plasticity induced by facilitatory and inhibitory PAS of the motor cortex in 12 healthy humans. They received 25, 100, or 200 mg ofl-DOPA or placebo medication combined with either excitability-enhancing or -diminishing PAS. Cortical excitability level was monitored before and for up to 2 d after plasticity induction by assessment of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potentials. Low-dosel-DOPA abolished the aftereffects of PAS and medium-dosel-DOPA prolonged facilitatory plasticity. High-dosel-DOPA reversed the excitability enhancement accomplished by facilitatory PAS to diminution. Thus, the results show a clear nonlinear effect ofl-DOPA dosage on associative plasticity, different from that on nonfocal plasticity. This might help to explain dopaminergic effect on cognition and could be relevant for understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases accompanied by alterations of the dopaminergic system.