Hiroyuki Hanada

Prof. Hiroyuki Hanada

Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
ONOsamu Nomura
Osamu Nomura
JIJin Irie
Jin Irie
YPYoonsoo Park
Yoonsoo Park
HNHiroshi Nonogi
Hiroshi Nonogi
HHHiroyuki Hanada
Hiroyuki Hanada
(1) Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of using a pre-existing video on CPR to support preclinical resuscitation education for medical students; (2) Methods: In total, 129 students selected to learn CPR using a pre-existing YouTube video or the conventional screencast video by their university faculties. All students responded to the pre- and post-training multiple-choice questionnaire on the basic knowledge of CPR, and, based on their responses, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted to assess the comparability of effectiveness across learning modalities. (3) Results: Among the students, 49 (38.0%) students selected the YouTube video to learn about CPR and were treated as the intervention group. The mean pre-test scores and post-test scores of the YouTube and the instructor’s video groups were 6.43 and 6.64, and 9.06 and 9.09, respectively. After controlling for the pre-test score effects, the results of ANCOVA did not show statistically significant differences between groups (p = 0.927), indicating comparable performance between groups that used YouTube and the instructor’s videos. (4) Conclusion: Utilizing YouTube videos is a useful teaching strategy for teaching CPR knowledge, which would reduce the burden on faculty of creating screencast lecture videos for online learning on resuscitation.

10 December 2025 in Circulation Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YHYumiko Hosoya
Yumiko Hosoya
MYMasahiro Yamamoto
Masahiro Yamamoto
HHHiroyuki Hanada
Hiroyuki Hanada
TOTakumi Osawa
Takumi Osawa
MAMarina Arai
Marina Arai
TMTetsuya Matoba
Tetsuya Matoba
Background: Because the optimal choice of vasopressor for the initial treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS) remains controversial, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether noradrenaline improves clinical outcomes compared with other vasopressors (adrenaline, dopamine, and vasopressin) in patients with CS.Methods and Results: PubMed, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing noradrenaline with other vasopressors in adults with CS. A meta-analysis was conducted using fixed-effect models where appropriate. Two RCTs were included (n=337). One trial enrolled 57 patients and compared the effects of noradrenaline and adrenaline. Another study included 280 patients with CS as a subgroup and compared noradrenaline with dopamine. Pooled analysis showed that noradrenaline likely reduced the 28-day mortality rate compared with other vasopressors (very-low certainty). This corresponded to approximately 110 fewer deaths per 1000 patients (95% confidence interval: 217 fewer to 5 fewer). Secondary outcomes from the Levy study indicated fewer adverse events in the noradrenaline group.Conclusions: Noradrenaline likely reduces the 28-day mortality rate compared with other vasopressors (very-low certainty) in CS. Given the small number of studies and the potential bias, further large-scale trials are warranted.

10 November 2025 in Circulation Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MYMasahiro Yamamoto
Masahiro Yamamoto
YHYumiko Hosoya
Yumiko Hosoya
HHHiroyuki Hanada
Hiroyuki Hanada
TOTakumi Osawa
Takumi Osawa
MAMarina Arai
Marina Arai
TMTetsuya Matoba
Tetsuya Matoba
Background: Inotropes play a significant role in the treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS). Phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitors (PDE3i) are being used with increasing frequency, despite limited supporting evidence.Methods and Results: We performed a systematic review to assess the clinical importance of PDE3i in CS. The search included studies that compared the effect of ‘PDE3i with or without inotropes’ with ‘No PDE3i with or without inotropes’ in patients with cardiogenic shock. Early death, cardiac arrest, and initiation of renal replacement therapy were assessed as outcomes. We identified 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) with a total of 224 patients who met the eligibility requirements from the PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases, up until October 31, 2024. One RCT compared milrinone with dobutamine (DOB), and another compared enoximone with levosimendan. Meta-analysis revealed that PDE3i were neither superior nor inferior for the outcomes in the total cohort (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35–6.26 for early deaths; OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.42–3.14 for cardiac arrest; OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.80–2.92 for the initiation of renal replacement therapy).Conclusions: The present systematic review revealed no difference in outcomes, early deaths, cardiac arrest and initiation of renal replacement therapy when using PDE3i in patients with CS treated with or without other inotropes.

AAARISA AOYAGI
ARISA AOYAGI
ONOsamu Nomura
Osamu Nomura
NSNorihiro Sasaki
Norihiro Sasaki
YFYuki Fujita
Yuki Fujita
NINana Ichikawa
Nana Ichikawa
HHHiroyuki Hanada
Hiroyuki Hanada
(1) Background: Injuries to the upper limbs during wood splitting can affect social and economic life. We aimed to describe the clinical information concerning these injuries in Japan. (2) Methods: We identified patients from our patient database from April 2015–November 2021 and extracted data from their medical records, which includes age, gender, occupation, month, time and location of the injury, diagnosis, duration of hospitalization, ICU admission, treatment interventions including surgery, outcome, and medical costs. (3) Result: Seventeen cases were identified. Most of the patients were male (n = 15), with median age being 68 years old. Regarding the patients’ backgrounds, six were apple farmers and three were unemployed. Injuries to the index finger was most common (n = 9), followed by injuries to the thumb in five cases (n = 5). Most of the incidents occurred at home or on the patient’s farm estate. No injuries were due to incidents at work. (4) Conclusion: The wood splitter-related injuries required long-term treatment and frequently damaged the thumb, a functionally important digit. All the injuries were sustained during non-occupational use of a wood splitter. Therefore, we suggest that safety training should be provided to prevent traumatic injuries when these products are being sold.