Haoran Xie

Prof. Haoran Xie

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2025 in Frontiers of Architectural Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CLChengyuan Li
Chengyuan Li
TZTianyu Zhang
Tianyu Zhang
XDXusheng Du
Xusheng Du
YZYe Zhang
Ye Zhang
HXHaoran Xie
Haoran Xie

1 March 2022 in Computational Visual Media
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZHZhengyu Huang
Zhengyu Huang
YPYichen Peng
Yichen Peng
THTomohiro Hibino
Tomohiro Hibino
CZChunqi Zhao
Chunqi Zhao
HXHaoran Xie
Haoran Xie
KMKazunori Miyata
Kazunori Miyata
Special skills are required in portrait painting, such as imagining geometric structures and facial detail for final portrait designs. This makes it a difficult task for users, especially novices without prior artistic training, to draw freehand portraits with high-quality details. In this paper, we propose dualFace, a portrait drawing interface to assist users with different levels of drawing skills to complete recognizable and authentic face sketches. Inspired by traditional artist workflows for portrait drawing, dualFace gives two-stages of drawing assistance to provide global and local visual guidance. The former helps users draw contour lines for portraits (i.e., geometric structure), and the latter helps users draw details of facial parts, which conform to the user-drawn contour lines. In the global guidance stage, the user draws several contour lines, and dualFace then searches for several relevant images from an internal database and displays the suggested face contour lines on the background of the canvas. In the local guidance stage, we synthesize detailed portrait images with a deep generative model from user-drawn contour lines, and then use the synthesized results as detailed drawing guidance. We conducted a user study to verify the effectiveness of dualFace, which confirms that dualFace significantly helps users to produce a detailed portrait sketch.

11 March 2019
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
HXHaoran Xie
Haoran Xie
KMKento Mitsuhashi
Kento Mitsuhashi
TTTakuma Torii
Takuma Torii

27 May 2019 in Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZHZhongyuan Hu
Zhongyuan Hu
HXHaoran Xie
Haoran Xie
TFTsukasa Fukusato
Tsukasa Fukusato
TSTakahiro Sato
Takahiro Sato
TITakeo Igarashi
Takeo Igarashi

23 July 2023
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
ZHZhengyu Huang
Zhengyu Huang
HXHaoran Xie
Haoran Xie
TFTsukasa Fukusato
Tsukasa Fukusato
KMKazunori Miyata
Kazunori Miyata

29 November 2022 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSukhum Sankaewthong
Sukhum Sankaewthong
THTeerayut Horanont
Teerayut Horanont
KMKazunori Miyata
Kazunori Miyata
JKJessada Karnjana
Jessada Karnjana
CBChawee Busayarat
Chawee Busayarat
HXHaoran Xie
Haoran Xie
At present, buildings are increasingly being designed with transparent materials, with glass paneling being especially popular as an installation material due to its architectural allure. However, its major drawback is admitting impractical amounts of sunlight into interior spaces. Office buildings with excessive sunlight in indoor areas lead to worker inefficiency. This article studied kinetic façades as means to provide suitable sunlight for interior spaces, integrated with a triple-identity DNA structure, photosynthetic behavior, and the twist, which was divided into generation and evaluation. The generating phase first used an evolutionary engine to produce potential strip patterns. The kinetic façade was subsequently evaluated using the Climate Studio software to validate daylight admission in an indoor space with Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) version 4.1 criteria. To analyze the kinetic façade system, the building envelope was divided into four types: glass panel, static façade, rotating façade (the kinetic façade, version 1); an existing kinetic façade that is commonly seen in the market, and twisting façade (the kinetic façade, version 2); the kinetic façade that uses the process to invent the new identity of the façade. In addition, for both the rotating façade and twisting façade, the degrees of simulation were 20, 50, 80, and 100 degrees, in order to ascertain the potential for both façades to the same degree. Comparing all façades receiving the daylight factor (DF) into the space with more or less sunlight resulted in a decreasing order of potential, as follows: entirely glass façade, twisting façade (the kinetic façade, version 2), rotating façade (the kinetic façade, version 1), and static façade. By receiving the daylight factor (DF), the façade moderately and beneficially filtered appropriate amounts of daylight into the working space. The daylight simulation results indicated that the newly designed kinetic façade (version 2) had more potential than other building envelope types in terms of filtering beneficial daylight in indoor areas. This article also experimented with the kinetic façade prototype in an actual situation to test conditional environmental potential. The twisting façade (the kinetic façade, version 2) was explored in the building envelope with varied adaptability to provide sunlight and for private-to-public, public-to-private, or semi-public working areas.
1