BACKGROUND. Mirabegron is a β3-adrenergic receptor (β3-AR) agonist approved only for the treatment of overactive bladder. Encouraging preclinical results suggest that β3-AR agonists could also improve obesity-related metabolic disease by increasing brown adipose tissue (BAT) thermogenesis, white adipose tissue (WAT) lipolysis, and insulin sensitivity. METHODS. We treated 14 healthy women of diverse ethnicities (27.5 ± 1.1 years of age, BMI of 25.4 ± 1.2 kg/m²) with 100 mg mirabegron (Myrbetriq extended-release tablet, Astellas Pharma) for 4 weeks in an open-label study. The primary endpoint was the change in BAT metabolic activity as measured by [¹⁸F]-2-fluoro-d-2-deoxy-d-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET/CT. Secondary endpoints included resting energy expenditure (REE), plasma metabolites, and glucose and insulin metabolism as assessed by a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. RESULTS. Chronic mirabegron therapy increased BAT metabolic activity. Whole-body REE was higher, without changes in body weight or composition. Additionally, there were elevations in plasma levels of the beneficial lipoprotein biomarkers HDL and ApoA1, as well as total bile acids. Adiponectin, a WAT-derived hormone that has antidiabetic and antiinflammatory capabilities, increased with acute treatment and was 35% higher upon completion of the study. Finally, an intravenous glucose tolerance test revealed higher insulin sensitivity, glucose effectiveness, and insulin secretion. CONCLUSION. These findings indicate that human BAT metabolic activity can be increased after chronic pharmacological stimulation with mirabegron and support the investigation of β3-AR agonists as a treatment for metabolic disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03049462. FUNDING. This work was supported by grants from the Intramural Research Program of the NIDDK, NIH (DK075112, DK075116, DK071013, and DK071014).

There is wide variance among individuals in the fraction of insulin cleared by the liver (20% to 80%). Hepatic insulin clearance is 67% lower in African Americans than European Americans. Clearance is also lower in African American children 7–13 years of age. Lower hepatic insulin clearance will result in peripheral hyperinsulinemia: this exacerbates insulin resistance, which stresses the β-cells, possibly resulting in their ultimate failure and onset of type 2 diabetes. We hypothesize that lower insulin clearance can be a primary cause of type 2 diabetes in at-risk individuals.

Objective: Insulin resistance is a powerful risk factor for Type 2 diabetes and a constellation of chronic diseases, and is most commonly associated with obesity. We examined if factors other than obesity are more substantial predictors of insulin sensitivity under baseline, nonstimulated conditions.Methods: Metabolic assessment was performed in healthy dogs (n = 90). Whole‐body sensitivity from euglycemic clamps (SI_CLAMP) was the primary outcome variable, and was measured independently by IVGTT (n = 36). Adiposity was measured by MRI (n = 90), and glucose‐stimulated insulin response was measured from hyperglycemic clamp or IVGTT (n = 86 and 36, respectively).Results: SI_CLAMP was highly variable (5.9‐75.9 dl/min per kg per μU/ml). Despite narrow range of body weight (mean, 28.7 ± 0.3 kg), adiposity varied approximately eight‐fold and was inversely correlated with SI_CLAMP (P < 0.025). SI_CLAMP was negatively associated with fasting insulin, but most strongly associated with insulin clearance. Clearance was the dominant factor associated with sensitivity (r = 0.53, P < 0.00001), whether calculated from clamp or IVGTT.Conclusions: These data suggest that insulin clearance contributes substantially to insulin sensitivity, and may be pivotal in understanding the pathogenesis of insulin resistance. We propose the hyperinsulinemia due to reduction in insulin clearance is responsible for insulin resistance secondary to changes in body weight.

Accurate quantification of insulin resistance is essential for determining efficacy of treatments to reduce diabetes risk. Gold-standard methods to assess resistance are available (e.g., hyperinsulinemic clamp or minimal model), but surrogate indices based solely on fasting values have attractive simplicity. One such surrogate, the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), is widely applied despite known inaccuracies in characterizing resistance across groups. Of greater significance is whether HOMA-IR can detect changes in insulin sensitivity induced by an intervention. We tested the ability of HOMA-IR to detect high-fat diet–induced insulin resistance in 36 healthy canines using clamp and minimal model analysis of the intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) to document progression of resistance. The influence of pancreatic function on HOMA-IR accuracy was assessed using the acute insulin response during the IVGTT (AIRG). Diet-induced resistance was confirmed by both clamp and minimal model (P < 0.0001), and measures were correlated with each other (P = 0.001). In striking contrast, HOMA-IR ([fasting insulin (μU/mL) × fasting glucose (mmol)]/22.5) did not detect reduced sensitivity induced by fat feeding (P = 0.22). In fact, 13 of 36 animals showed an artifactual decrease in HOMA-IR (i.e., increased sensitivity). The ability of HOMA-IR to detect diet-induced resistance was particularly limited under conditions when insulin secretory function (AIRG) is less than robust. In conclusion, HOMA-IR is of limited utility for detecting diet-induced deterioration of insulin sensitivity quantified by glucose clamp or minimal model. Caution should be exercised when using HOMA-IR to detect insulin resistance when pancreatic function is compromised. It is necessary to use other accurate indices to detect longitudinal changes in insulin resistance with any confidence.

In the 1950’s, Dr. I. Arthur Mirsky first recognized the possible importance of insulin degradation changes to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. While this mechanism was ignored for decades, insulin degradation is now being recognized as a possible factor in diabetes risk. After Mirsky, the relative importance of defects in insulin release and insulin resistance were recognized as risk factors. The hyperbolic relationship between secretion and sensitivity was introduced, as was the relationship between them, as expressed as the disposition index (DI). The DI was shown to be affected by environmental and genetic factors, and it was shown to be differentiated among ethnic groups. However, the importance of differences in insulin degradation (clearance) on the disposition index relationship remains to be clarified. Direct measure of insulin clearance revealed it to be highly variable among even normal individuals, and to be affected by fat feeding and other physiologic factors. Insulin clearance is relatively lower in ethnic groups at high risk for diabetes such as African Americans and Hispanic Americans, compared to European Americans. These differences exist even for young children. Two possible mechanisms have been proposed for the importance of insulin clearance for diabetes risk: in one concept, insulin resistance per se leads to reduced clearance and diabetes risk. In a second and new concept, reduced degradation is a primary factor leading to diabetes risk, such that lower clearance (resulting from genetics or environment) leads to systemic hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and beta-cell stress. Recent data by Chang and colleagues appear to support this latter hypothesis in Native Americans. The importance of insulin clearance as a risk factor for metabolic disease is becoming recognized and may be treatable.

Insulin resistance engenders a compensatory increase in plasma insulin. Inadequate compensation is a primary element in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. The signal that heralds developing insulin resistance and initiates hyperinsulinemic compensation is not known. It has often been assumed to be increased glucose. We tested this assumption by determining whether development of fasting and/or glucose-stimulated hyperinsulinemia with diet-induced insulin resistance occurs because of concomitant elevation of glycemia. Male dogs (n = 58) were fed a hypercaloric, fat-supplemented diet for 6 weeks. Dogs underwent magnetic resonance imaging to quantify total and regional (visceral, subcutaneous) adiposity as well as euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps. A subset of animals also underwent an insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test to assess insulin sensitivity, acute insulin response (AIRg), and glucose effectiveness. Fat feeding caused modest weight gain, increased visceral and subcutaneous fat, and insulin resistance at both peripheral and hepatic levels. Hyperinsulinemic compensation was observed in fasting levels as well as increased AIRg. However, we observed absolutely no increase in carefully measured fasting, evening (6 to 8 pm) or nocturnal glycemia (2 to 4 am). Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia occurred despite no elevation in 24-hour glucose. Compensatory development of hyperinsulinemia during diet-induced insulin resistance occurs without elevated fasting or 24-hour glycemia. These data refute the idea that glucose itself is a requisite signal for β-cell upregulation. Alternative feedback mechanisms need to be identified.