Grant S. Stewart

Prof. Grant S. Stewart

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 1999 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGrant S. Stewart
Grant S. Stewart
RMRichard S Maser
Richard S Maser
TSTatjana Stankovic
Tatjana Stankovic
DBDebra A Bressan
Debra A Bressan
MKMark I Kaplan
Mark I Kaplan
ATA.MAlcolm R Taylor
A.MAlcolm R Taylor

1 February 2009 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGrant S. Stewart
Grant S. Stewart
SPStephanie Panier
Stephanie Panier
KTKelly Townsend
Kelly Townsend
AAAbdallah K. Al-Hakim
Abdallah K. Al-Hakim
NKNadine K. Kolas
Nadine K. Kolas
DDDaniel Durocher
Daniel Durocher

17 January 2010 in Nature Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ANAngela T. Noon
Angela T. Noon
ASAtsushi Shibata
Atsushi Shibata
NRNicole Rief
Nicole Rief
MLMarkus Löbrich
Markus Löbrich
GSGrant S. Stewart
Grant S. Stewart
AGAaron A. Goodarzi
Aaron A. Goodarzi

1 January 1999 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TSTatjana Stankovic
Tatjana Stankovic
PWPeter Weber
Peter Weber
GSGrant S. Stewart
Grant S. Stewart
TBTina Bedenham
Tina Bedenham
JMJim Murray
Jim Murray
ATA Malcolm R Taylor
A Malcolm R Taylor

4 February 2016 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKMarwan Kwok
Marwan Kwok
NDNicholas Davies
Nicholas Davies
AAAngelo Agathanggelou
Angelo Agathanggelou
ESEdward Smith
Edward Smith
COCeri Oldreive
Ceri Oldreive
TSTatjana Stankovic
Tatjana Stankovic
TP53 and ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) defects are associated with genomic instability, clonal evolution, and chemoresistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Currently, therapies capable of providing durable remissions in relapsed/refractory TP53- or ATM-defective CLL are lacking. Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) mediates response to replication stress, the absence of which leads to collapse of stalled replication forks into chromatid fragments that require resolution through the ATM/p53 pathway. Here, using AZD6738, a novel ATR kinase inhibitor, we investigated ATR inhibition as a synthetically lethal strategy to target CLL cells with TP53 or ATM defects. Irrespective of TP53 or ATM status, induction of CLL cell proliferation upregulated ATR protein, which then became activated in response to replication stress. In TP53- or ATM-defective CLL cells, inhibition of ATR signaling by AZD6738 led to an accumulation of unrepaired DNA damage, which was carried through into mitosis because of defective cell cycle checkpoints, resulting in cell death by mitotic catastrophe. Consequently, AZD6738 was selectively cytotoxic to both TP53- and ATM-defective CLL cell lines and primary cells. This was confirmed in vivo using primary xenograft models of TP53- or ATM-defective CLL, where treatment with AZD6738 resulted in decreased tumor load and reduction in the proportion of CLL cells with such defects. Moreover, AZD6738 sensitized TP53- or ATM-defective primary CLL cells to chemotherapy and ibrutinib. Our findings suggest that ATR is a promising therapeutic target for TP53- or ATM-defective CLL that warrants clinical investigation. Key Points ATR inhibition is synthetically lethal to TP53- or ATM-defective CLL cells. ATR targeting induces selective cytotoxicity and chemosensitization in TP53- or ATM-defective CLL cells in vitro and in vivo.

21 February 2018 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GRGeorge E. Ronson
George E. Ronson
APAnn Liza Piberger
Ann Liza Piberger
MHMartin R. Higgs
Martin R. Higgs
AOAnna L. Olsen
Anna L. Olsen
GSGrant S. Stewart
Grant S. Stewart
NLNicholas D. Lakin
Nicholas D. Lakin
PARP1 regulates the repair of DNA single-strand breaks generated directly, or during base excision repair (BER). However, the role of PARP2 in these and other repair mechanisms is unknown. Here, we report a requirement for PARP2 in stabilising replication forks that encounter BER intermediates through Fbh1-dependent regulation of Rad51. Whereas PARP2 is dispensable for tolerance of cells to SSBs or homologous recombination dysfunction, it is redundant with PARP1 in BER. Therefore, combined disruption of PARP1 and PARP2 leads to defective BER, resulting in elevated levels of replication-associated DNA damage owing to an inability to stabilise Rad51 at damaged replication forks and prevent uncontrolled DNA resection. Together, our results demonstrate how PARP1 and PARP2 regulate two independent, but intrinsically linked aspects of DNA base damage tolerance by promoting BER directly, and by stabilising replication forks that encounter BER intermediates.