When an airgun releases high-pressure gas underwater below an ice plate, it is observed that a bubble is formed rapidly while the ice plate is broken fiercely. In order to study the ice-water-gas interaction during this transient and violent phenomenon, a set of laboratory-scale devices was designed and a series of icebreaking experiments were carried out. High-speed photography was used to capture the evolution of the bubble and the ice plate. It was found that the airgun bubble had a unique ‘pear’ shape compared with the spherical bubble generated by electric sparking. The pressure induced by the pulsation of the airgun bubble near a rigid wall was measured by the pressure sensor. The initial shockwave, oscillatory pressure peaks caused by the directional fast air injection, secondary shockwave, and pressure peak caused by the bubble jet impact were clearly recorded. Three damage patterns of ice plates were observed and corresponding reasons were analyzed. The influence of dimensionless parameters, such as airgun-ice distance and ice thickness , was also investigated. The physical mechanism of ice-water-gas interaction was summarized.
Icebreaking by using underwater explosion bubbles and compressed high-pressure gas bubbles has gradually become an effective icebreaking method. In order to compare the damaging effect of these two methods on the ice body, a fluid–structure coupling model was established based on the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) method and a series of calculations were carried out. The morphological changes of underwater explosion bubbles and compressed gas bubbles at the same energy under the free surface; the changes of flow load near the rigid wall; and the damage caused to the ice plate were studied and compared. The damage effect of the ice plate was analyzed by detecting the number of failure elements of the ice plate, and the optimum standoff distance was found. For an ice plate with a radius of 0.19 m and a thickness of 0.15 m, the optimum standoff distance of the compressed gas bubbles with 120 J is 0.03 m, and the optimum standoff distance of the TNT with 120 J is 0.02875 m. The similarities and differences of the two sources of bubbles on ice plate damage were summarized.