Leeanne Mary Carey

Prof. Leeanne Mary Carey

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 June 2009 in Occupational Therapy International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IHIsobel J. Hubbard
Isobel J. Hubbard
MPMark W. Parsons
Mark W. Parsons
CNCheryl Neilson
Cheryl Neilson
LCLeeanne Carey
Leeanne Carey

6 May 2022 in Age and Ageing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMProfessor Meg Morris
Professor Meg Morris
KWKate Webster
Kate Webster
CJCathy Jones
Cathy Jones
Anne-Marie HillAnne-Marie Hill
Anne-Marie Hill
THTerry Haines
Terry Haines
ICIan Cameron
Ian Cameron
Falls remain a common and debilitating problem in hospitals worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of falls prevention interventions on falls rates and the risk of falling in hospital. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hospitalised adults. Prevention methods included staff and patient education, environmental modifications, assistive devices, policies and systems, rehabilitation, medication management and management of cognitive impairment. We evaluated single and multi-factorial approaches. Falls rate ratios (rate ratio: RaR) and falls risk, as defined by the odds of being a faller in the intervention compared to control group (odds ratio: OR). There were 43 studies that satisfied the systematic review criteria and 23 were included in meta-analyses. There was marked heterogeneity in intervention methods and study designs. The only intervention that yielded a significant result in the meta-analysis was education, with a reduction in falls rates (RaR = 0.70 [0.51–0.96], P = 0.03) and the odds of falling (OR = 0.62 [0.47–0.83], P = 0.001). The patient and staff education studies in the meta-analysis were of high quality on the GRADE tool. Individual trials in the systematic review showed evidence for clinician education, some multi-factorial interventions, select rehabilitation therapies, and systems, with low to moderate risk of bias. Patient and staff education can reduce hospital falls. Multi-factorial interventions had a tendency towards producing a positive impact. Chair alarms, bed alarms, wearable sensors and use of scored risk assessment tools were not associated with significant fall reductions.

1 January 1995 in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLeeanne Carey
Leeanne Carey
This article reviews evidence on the nature of stroke impairment, functional implications of sensory loss, and recent developments in measurement and intervention. Approximately 50% of stroke patients experience sensory impairment, especially of tactile and proprioceptive discriminations. The impairment has negative implications for exploration of environment, safety, movement, and rehabilitation outcomes. Recent research has advanced from the previous lack of standardized, quantitative assessments suitable for stroke patients and demonstrated effective retraining of somatosensations when current concepts of neurophysiology and learning are employed. Clinically and statistically significant improvements in discrimination of trained stimuli and generalized improvements in related stimuli have been obtained.

1 December 1996 in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLeeanne Carey
Leeanne Carey
LOLinda E. Oke
Linda E. Oke
TMThomas A. Matyas
Thomas A. Matyas

1 September 2014 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJhimli Mitra
Jhimli Mitra
PBPierrick Bourgeat
Pierrick Bourgeat
JFJurgen Fripp
Jurgen Fripp
SGSoumya Ghose
Soumya Ghose
SRStephen Rose
Stephen Rose
LCLeeanne Carey
Leeanne Carey

24 February 2011 in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLeeanne Carey
Leeanne Carey
RMRichard Macdonell
Richard Macdonell
TMThomas A. Matyas
Thomas A. Matyas
Background. Sensory loss is common after stroke, with negative impact on exploration of the immediate environment, hand function, and return to daily activities. Objective. To compare the effectiveness of a perceptual-learning based sensory discrimination program versus non-specific exposure to sensory stimuli via passive movements and grasping of common objects. Methods. The authors conducted a randomized parallel-group controlled trial, with blinding of subjects, clinical assessors, and data analysts. Fifty subjects with impaired texture discrimination, limb position sense, and/or tactile object recognition (>6 weeks, median 48 weeks poststroke) were randomized to receive somatosensory discrimination training (n = 25) or repeated exposure to sensory stimuli (n = 25) in 60-minute sessions for a total of 10 hours. The primary outcome was change in a composite standardized somatosensory deficit (SSD) index following intervention. Follow-up was at 6 weeks and 6 months posttraining. Results. Between-group comparisons revealed a significantly greater improvement in sensory capacity following sensory discrimination training, t(47) = 2.75, P = .004, 1-tailed; mean between-group change = 11.1 SSD; confidence interval 3.0 to 19.2. Improvements were maintained at 6 weeks and 6 months. Conclusion. Sensory discrimination training can achieve significant improvements in functional sensory discrimination capacity after stroke. The clinically oriented training achieved transfer of training effects to novel stimuli. Our findings provide support for introducing SENSe discrimination training in rehabilitation of sensory deficits after stroke.