Background: Pulmonary infection is a frequent complication among stroke patients and adversely affects clinical outcomes, increases the length of hospitalization stay and costs, and aggravates the financial burden of the national medical health system. Early identification and management of high-risk patients are necessary and imperative to reduce the incidence of stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP). Aim: The evidence-based practice project evaluated the effectiveness of a standard care bundle intervention in preventing the occurrence of SAP. Methods: The project was conducted in a neurology department of a teaching hospital. Given the variation in assessment and management standards, evidence-based practice (EBP) methodology was used to establish a process for quality improvement. A thorough literature search was conducted to identify evidence-based interventions to manage and prevent SAP. Thorough critiques of the literature and synthesis of the evidence were completed. A systematic management flow and care bundle interventions were established. The care bundle included interventions, such as the utilization of tools for SAP risk screening; dysphagia screening and rehabilitation; feeding modification, oral care, airway management, position management, and the nursing techniques of traditional Chinese medicine. Results: A significant improvement was observed in preventing SAP in patients in the postimplementation group compared with those in the preimplementation group (14.0% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.025). In addition, significantly lower duration of hospitalization, lower rate of aspiration, and improvements in albumin and oral hygiene were found after the implementation of the care bundle. Conclusions: Evidence-based care bundles successfully empower nurses to reduce the incidence of SAP. The management flow of SAP prevention could be promoted to other units of the neurology department in the future. The results of the project reflect positively on the capacity to implement EBP in an acute care setting for stroke. The EBP methodology can be utilized to solve other clinical problems.

Background:Remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPostC) appears to protect distant organs from ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). However, cerebral protection results have remained inconclusive. In the present study, a meta-analysis was performed to compare stroke patients with and without RIPostC.Met

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is one of the common postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery. Previous studies have explored the risk factors (such as age, diabetes, anaemia and ASA score) for SSI in patients with gastric cancer. However, there are large differences in the research results, and the correlation coefficients of different research results are quite different. We aim to investigate the risk factors of surgical site infection in patients with gastric cancer. We queried four English databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) and four Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biological Medicine Database, Wanfang Database and Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP Database)) to identify published literature related to risk factors for surgical site infection in patients with gastric cancer. Rev Man 5.4 and Stata 15.0 were used in this meta‐analysis. A total of 15 articles (n = 6206) were included in this analysis. The following risk factors were found to be significantly associated with surgical site infection in gastric cancer: male (OR = 1.28, 95% CI [1.06, 1.55]), age >60 (OR = 2.75, 95% CI [1.65, 4.57]), smoking (OR = 1.99, 95% CI [1.46, 2.73]), diabetes (OR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.59, 2.61]), anaemia (OR = 4.72, 95% CI [1.66, 13.40]), preoperative obstruction (OR = 3.07, 95% CI [1.80, 5.23]), TNM ≥ III (OR = 2.05, 95% CI [1.56, 2.70]), hypoproteinemia (OR = 3.05, 95% CI [2.08, 4.49]), operation time ≥3 h (OR = 8.33, 95% CI [3.81, 18.20]), laparotomy (OR = 2.18, 95% CI [1.61, 2.94]) and blood transfusion (OR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.01, 2.06]). This meta‐analysis showed that male, age >60, smoking, diabetes, anaemia, preoperative obstruction, TNM ≥ III, hypoproteinemia, operation time ≥3 h, open surgery and blood transfusion were the risk factors for SSI in patients with gastric cancer.

Cognitive frailty (CF) is characterized by the coexistence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment, and it is associated with adverse health outcomes. Older adults are particularly vulnerable to CF due to factors such as age-related brain changes and the presence of comorbidities. To investigate the effect of preoperative CF on postoperative complications in older patients. This prospective cohort study was conducted among 253 patients aged 60–85 years, who underwent elective orthopedic and abdominal surgery (with a postoperative hospital stay of ≥ 3 days) at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine from May 2023 to November 2023. CF was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for the cognitive status and the Fried criteria for five frailty scales. Participants were split into four groups: Group A (neither frailty nor cognitive impairment), Group B (frailty without cognitive impairment), Group C (cognitive impairment without frailty), and Group D (cognitive frailty). The primary outcome was postoperative complications, while secondary outcomes included mobility disability, prolonged hospital stay (PLOS), re-operation and 90-day readmission. The median age (interquartile range) of participants was 69 (65–73) years, of which 40.3% were male. The prevalence of CF was 17.8%. The incidence of postoperative complications was 18.2% in Group A, 50.0% in Group B, 37.4% in Group C, and 75.6% in Group D. Multivariate analysis revealed that, compared to the control group (without cognitive impairment or frailty), patients with CF had a significantly higher risk of postoperative complications (OR, 12.86; 95%CI, 4.23–39.08). “Patients with frailty without cognitive impairment” had an increased risk (OR, 6.53; 95%CI, 2.04–20.9), while “those with cognitive impairment without frailty” also showed a higher risk (OR, 3.46; 95%CI, 1.57–7.64). Cognitive frailty is significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative adverse outcomes in older patients undergoing orthopedic and abdominal surgeries with general anesthesia. It indicates that clinicians should pay much attention to these older adults with CF.

The aims of this study were to examine the symptom severity and interference among patients with lung cancer treated with PD-1 immunotherapy, explore whether those symptoms were clustered together, and identify factors associated with symptom clusters. A cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were collected by demographic and clinical characteristic questionnaires and the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Lung Cancer Module. Symptom clusters were identified using exploratory factor analysis, and stepwise linear regression was applied to analyze the factors affecting the symptom clusters. A total of 148 patients with lung cancer treated with PD-1 immunotherapy participated in this study. The overall symptom burdens of these patients were mainly at a mild level. The patient symptom clusters identified in this study were a general cluster, a treatment-related cluster, a pulmonary cluster, a gastrointestinal cluster, and a neural cluster. The patients’ Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score (β ​= ​−2.758, P ​< ​0.001) and having a history of chemotherapy (β ​= ​4.384, P ​= ​0.001) were significant predictors of the general cluster. Their KPS scores (β ​= ​−1.202, P ​< ​0.001) and having a history of chemotherapy (β ​= ​−1.957, P ​= ​0.001) were significant predictors of the pulmonary cluster. Their monthly income (β ​= ​−0.316, P ​= ​0.030) and KPS scores (β ​= ​−0.357, P ​= ​0.045) were significant predictors of the gastrointestinal cluster. Having a history of chemotherapy (β ​= ​1.868, P ​< ​0.001) was the predictor of the neural cluster. The symptom burdens of patients with lung cancer and treated with PD-1 immunotherapy were at a mild level and appeared to be clustered. In addition, because the symptoms that comprise a cluster are interrelated, the diagnosis and management of each symptom in a cluster should not be performed in isolation, and each symptom in a cluster should be treated either simultaneously or in an orderly manner.