Electrolyte abnormalities are not uncommon in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Several studies have suggested that various electrolyte imbalances seem to have an impact on disease prognosis. However, no study has primarily focused on the effect of baseline electrolyte abnormalities on disease outcome. In this study, we assessed the validity of the hypothesis that baseline electrolyte imbalances may be related to unfavourable outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Design of the study was retrospective and observational. We included 408 hospitalized individuals with COVID-19 over 18 years old. Baseline levels of sodium, potassium, calcium and chloride were assessed and the effects of abnormalities in these electrolytes on requirement for intensive care unit and mechanical ventilation, hospitalization duration and treatment outcome were evaluated. Patients were clustered based on electrolyte levels and clusters were compared according to outcome variables. Frequency of other severe disease indices was compared between the clusters. Lastly, we evaluated the independent factors related to COVID-19-associated deaths with multivariate analyses. In all, 228 (55.8%) of the patients had at least one electrolyte imbalance at baseline. Hyponatraemia was the most frequent electrolyte abnormality. Patients with hyponatraemia, hypochloraemia or hypocalcaemia had, respectively, more frequent requirement for intensive care unit and mechanical ventilation, higher mortality rate and longer hospitalization. The clusters associated with electrolyte abnormalities had unfavourable outcomes. Also, Clinical and laboratory features associated with severe disease were detected more often in those clusters. Hyponatraemia was an independent factor related to death from COVID-19 (OR 10.33; 95% CI 1.62–65.62; p 0.01). Furthermore, baseline electrolyte imbalances, primarily hyponatraemia, were related to poor prognosis in COVID-19 and baseline electrolyte assessment would be beneficial for evaluating the risk of severe COVID-19.

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of gender on clinical findings, disease activity, functional status and quality of life in patients with axial involvement in Turkey. Methods: Patients with PsA who met the CASPAR classification criteria were enrolled consequently in this cohort. Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR)-Network was formed with the participation of 25 centres. The demographic variables, fatigue, diagnostic delay, the beginning of peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis and spine involvement, inflammatory low back pain, BASFI, HAQ, HAQ-s, visual analog scale-pain (VAS-pain), anxiety, depression and disease activity parameters (ESR, DAS28, BASDAI) were recorded. Axial involvement was assessed according to clinical and radiological data according to modified New York (MNYC) or SpondyloArthritis International Society Assessment (ASAS) criteria (AC). Results: A total of 1018 patients with PsA were included in this study. Of the 373 patients with axial involvement, 150 were male (40.2%) and 223 (59.8%) were female. Spondylitis was detected in 14,7% of men and 21,9% of women in all patients. Pain score (VAS) (p< 0,002), fatigue (p <0.001), ESR (p <0.001), DAS28 (p <0.001), BASDAI score (p <0.001), PsAQoL (p <0.001), HAQ score (p < 0,01), HAQ-S score (p< 0.001), anxiety (p <0.001), depression (p < 0,024), FACIT (p <0.001) and FiRST (p <0.001) scores were statistically significantly worse in women than males with axial PsA. However, quality of life was better (p <0.001) and PASI score (p< 0.005) were statistically worse in male patients than in female patients with axial involvement. Conclusion: This study has shown that the burden of disease in axial PsA has significant difference between genders. Disease activity, physical disability, functional limitation, depression and anxiety scores were higher in female patients, while quality of life were better and PASI score were higher in male patients. Therefore, we suggest that new strategies should be developed for more effective treatment of axial PsA in female patients.

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effectivity of Familial Mediterranean Fever Quality of Life (FMF-QoL) Scale for the measurement of QoL in patients with FMF and to perform correlations between related clinical variables in Turkish patients. Patients and methods: This multicenter prospective study performed between December 2017 and November 2018 included 974 FMF patients (334 males, 640 females; median age: 35; range, 26 to 45 years). Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical features were recorded. All participants were asked to complete the FMF-QoL Scale, Short Form-36 (SF-36), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Scale. Results: The median FMF-QoL Scale score was 26. Higher FMF-QoL Scale scores were shown to be related to female sex, illiteracy or primary education, monthly low-income (US$20 years), a higher number of attacks per month (>1/month), and severe disease. FMF-QoL Scale scores were correlated negatively with subscales of SF-36, and positively with HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression scores, HAQ and FACIT. Conclusion: Female sex, smoking, lower educational status, more severe disease, fatigue, and functional impairment were associated with poor QoL. FMF-QoL Scale was noted as a valid and simple patient-reported outcome instrument and correlated with the SF-36 scale.