Erkut Borazanci

Dr. Erkut Borazanci


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 May 2020 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BBBruno Bockorny
Bruno Bockorny
VSValerya Semenisty
Valerya Semenisty
TMTeresa Macarulla
Teresa Macarulla
EBErkut Borazanci
Erkut Borazanci
BWBrian M. Wolpin
Brian M. Wolpin
MHManuel Hidalgo
Manuel Hidalgo

17 April 2019 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YSYu Shi
Yu Shi
WGWeina Gao
Weina Gao
NLNikki K. Lytle
Nikki K. Lytle
PHPeiwu Huang
Peiwu Huang
XYXiao Yuan
Xiao Yuan
THTony Hunter
Tony Hunter

29 September 2020 in Genome Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WLWei Lin
Wei Lin
PNPawan Noel
Pawan Noel
EBErkut Borazanci
Erkut Borazanci
JLJeeyun Lee
Jeeyun Lee
AAAlbert Amini
Albert Amini
HHHaiyong Han
Haiyong Han
Background: Solid tumors such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) comprise not just tumor cells but also a microenvironment with which the tumor cells constantly interact. Detailed characterization of the cellular composition of the tumor microenvironment is critical to the understanding of the disease and treatment of the patient. Single-cell transcriptomics has been used to study the cellular composition of different solid tumor types including PDAC. However, almost all of those studies used primary tumor tissues. Methods: In this study, we employed a single-cell RNA sequencing technology to profile the transcriptomes of individual cells from dissociated primary tumors or metastatic biopsies obtained from patients with PDAC. Unsupervised clustering analysis as well as a new supervised classification algorithm, SuperCT, was used to identify the different cell types within the tumor tissues. The expression signatures of the different cell types were then compared between primary tumors and metastatic biopsies. The expressions of the cell type-specific signature genes were also correlated with patient survival using public datasets. Results: Our single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed distinct cell types in primary and metastatic PDAC tissues including tumor cells, endothelial cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and immune cells. The cancer cells showed high inter-patient heterogeneity, whereas the stromal cells were more homogenous across patients. Immune infiltration varies significantly from patient to patient with majority of the immune cells being macrophages and exhausted lymphocytes. We found that the tumor cellular composition was an important factor in defining the PDAC subtypes. Furthermore, the expression levels of cell type-specific markers for EMT+ cancer cells, activated CAFs, and endothelial cells significantly associated with patient survival. Conclusions: Taken together, our work identifies significant heterogeneity in cellular compositions of PDAC tumors and between primary tumors and metastatic lesions. Furthermore, the cellular composition was an important factor in defining PDAC subtypes and significantly correlated with patient outcome. These findings provide valuable insights on the PDAC microenvironment and could potentially inform the management of PDAC patients.

1 April 2021 in eClinicalMedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GFGerald Falchook
Gerald Falchook
JIJeffrey Infante
Jeffrey Infante
HAHendrik-Tobias Arkenau
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau
MPManish R. Patel
Manish R. Patel
EDEmma Dean
Emma Dean
HBHoward Burris
Howard Burris
We conducted a first-in-human dose-escalation study with the oral FASN inhibitor TVB-2640 to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), as monotherapy and with a taxane. This completed open-label outpatient study was conducted at 11 sites in the United States and United Kingdom. Patients with previously-treated advanced metastatic solid tumors and adequate performance status and organ function were eligible. TVB-2640 was administered orally daily until PD. Dose escalation initially followed an accelerated titration design that switched to a standard 3 + 3 design after Grade 2 toxicity occurred. Disease-specific cohorts were enrolled at the MTD. Statistical analyses were primarily descriptive. Safety analyses were performed on patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02223247) The study was conducted from 21 November 2013 to 07 February 2017. Overall, 136 patients received TVB-2640, 76 as monotherapy (weight-based doses of 60 mg/m2 to 240 mg/m2 and flat doses of 200 and 250 mg) and 60 in combination, (weight-based doses of 60 mg/m2 to 100 mg/m2 and flat dose of 200 mg) (55 paclitaxel, 5 docetaxel). DLTs with TVB-2640 were reversible skin and ocular effects. The MTD/RP2D was 100 mg/m2. The most common TEAEs (n,%) with TVB-2640 monotherapy were alopecia (46; 61%), PPE syndrome (35; 46%), fatigue (28; 37%), decreased appetite (20; 26%), and dry skin (17; 22%), and with TVB-2640+paclitaxel were fatigue (29 ; 53%), alopecia (25; 46%), PPE syndrome (25; 46%), nausea (22; 40%), and peripheral neuropathy (20; 36%). One fatal case of drug-related pneumonitis occurred with TVB-2640+paclitaxel; no other treatment-related deaths occurred. Target engagement (FASN inhibition) and inhibition of lipogenesis were demonstrated with TVB-2640. The disease control rate (DCR) with TVB-2640 monotherapy was 42%; no patient treated with monotherapy had a complete or partial response (CR or PR). In combination with paclitaxel, the PR rate was 11% and the DCR was 70%. Responses were seen across multiple tumor types, including in patients with KRASMUT NSCLC, ovarian, and breast cancer. TVB-2640 demonstrated potent FASN inhibition and a predictable and manageable safety profile, primarily characterized by non-serious, reversible adverse events affecting skin and eyes. Further investigation of TVB-2640 in patients with solid tumors, particularly in KRASMUT lung, ovarian, and breast cancer, is warranted. This trial was funded by 3-V Biosciences, Inc. (now known as Sagimet Biosciences Inc.).

1 May 2019 in Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PNPawan Noel
Pawan Noel
DHDaniel D. Von Hoff
Daniel D. Von Hoff
ASAshok K. Saluja
Ashok K. Saluja
MVMohana Velagapudi
Mohana Velagapudi
EBErkut Borazanci
Erkut Borazanci
HHHaiyong Han
Haiyong Han

1 July 2019 in JAMA Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TKThomas B. Karasic
Thomas B. Karasic
MOMark H. O’hAra
Mark H. O’hAra
ALArturo Loaiza-Bonilla
Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla
KRKim A. Reiss
Kim A. Reiss
UTUrsina R. Teitelbaum
Ursina R. Teitelbaum
POPeter J. O’dWyer
Peter J. O’dWyer
Chemotherapy remains the only effective treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).1 Both FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and gemcitabine hydrochloride with nab-paclitaxel (GA) improve overall survival (OS) compared with gemcitabine alone and are associated with occasional long-term survival, suggesting a substantial effect on a subset of patients.2,3 Nonetheless, essentially all patients experience acquired resistance to therapy, as manifested by regrowth of the tumor.