L’utilisation accrue des pesticides chimiques couplée au boom agricole à laquelle on assiste ces dernières années soulève des interrogations sur la vulnérabilité des ressources naturelles, en particulier les ressources hydrologiques des zones cotonnières du Bénin. Cette étude vise à analyser les pratiques de gestion des pesticides chimiques agricoles à l’échelle « paysan » afin de comparer ces pratiques aux normes recommandées. Les données analysées ont été collectées dans la commune de Gogounou auprès de cent cinquante (150) producteurs tous répartis dans six (6) villages. Il ressort de nos investigations que les matières actives des pesticides les plus utilisées dans le bassin cotonnier du Bénin sont le glyphosate, l’atrazine, le flubendiamide, le spirotétramate et les pyréthrinoïdes (Emamectine, Cyfluthrine, Cyperméthrine, Betacyfluthrine). Une faible proportion des insecticides est commercialisée par le circuit informel (09 %) contrairement aux insecticides dont la majorité (60 %) provient de ce circuit. De même, les pesticides non autorisés proviennent en majorité du circuit informel (93,9 % des herbicides et 21,5 % des insecticides). La majorité des producteurs (90,3 %) utilise en moyenne 3,4 flacons de Tihan par hectare (soit 0,34 litre par hectare) de plus que la moyenne recommandée. De plus, les doses de pesticides utilisées par hectare augmentent au fur et à mesure que les champs sont proches des points d’eau. La gestion et l’utilisation très peu rigoureuses des pesticides constatés dans cette zone pourraient constituer une menace pour le maintien de la biodiversité et de la productivité des écosystèmes naturels, de la qualité sanitaire des produits halieutiques et de la santé des producteurs et des consommateurs. Face à ce constat, le défit de la recherche serait la détermination du niveau actuel de contamination des eaux du bassin et celui de l’État serait l’initiation de programmes de sensibilisation des producteurs par rapport à une gestion plus rigoureuse des pesticides.

In rural economies where land is a critical asset, tenure security plays a pivotal role in sustainable development. While previous research emphasized the economic impacts of secure land rights, their broader social and environmental contributions remain underexplored. This study investigates how land tenure security affects economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development in rural Benin. Using a mixed-methods approach—household surveys (n = 372), focus group discussions, and key informant interviews—and structural equation modeling, the analysis reveals that secure land rights significantly enhance investment, credit access, social cohesion, gender equality, and sustainable land practices such as agroforestry. Stronger legal rights (land titles and ADC/CFR certificates) yield more substantial benefits compared to land use certificates or no documentation. The findings highlight land governance as a cross-cutting driver of SDGs 1, 2, 5, 13, and 15. The study recommends inclusive, gender-sensitive, and context-adapted land policies to foster rural sustainability and resilience.

Access to land is crucial for food systems to address the challenges caused by habitat and biodiversity loss, land and water degradation, and greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainable food production requires land security upstream for agricultural production. Land security emanates from the land law implemented in-country by government policy. In the span of a decade (2007–2017), three different land reforms have been adopted in Benin. This paper aims to investigate the land rights and land tenure security for sustainable food production according to land law and the factors that influence agricultural entrepreneurial activities in North Benin. The study was carried out in the Borgou department, mainly in five communes that are beneficiaries of the Responsible Land Policy Project of GIZ (Promotion d’une Politique Foncière Responsible: ProPFR/GIZ). A multistage sampling procedure was used to select the agricultural entrepreneur respondents. A total of 102 agriculture entrepreneurs were interviewed in 25 villages. According to land law in Benin, the results highlight the different levels of land tenure security and land rights represented by types of land documents: type contract (use right), certificates of customary ownership (ADC), and land title. The research reveals that 44.3% of the land of agriculture entrepreneurs’ respondents possessed the certificates of customary ownership and 18% possessed the land title. The facilitation of access to legal land documents such as certificates of customary ownership and land titles can protect agricultural entrepreneurship for sustainable food production.

Flooding, exacerbated by climate change, urbanization, and poor land-use practices, is a growing challenge for rural households in the Volta Basin. This study examines the effectiveness of flood management practices in improving household resilience in Benin and Togo. Using a mixed-methods approach, including focus group discussions, individual interviews, and structural equation modeling, we analyze three categories of flood management practices: Endogenous Knowledge-Based Practices (EKPs), Community Engagement-Based Practices (CEPs), and Agricultural Technology-Based Practices (ATPs). The results show significant contributions from CEPs to resilience and highlight the role of social cohesion and collective action. EKPs also have a positive impact, reflecting the importance of local knowledge, especially in Benin. However, the adoption of ATPs varies, with greater effectiveness observed in Togo than in Benin. Factors such as age, gender, education, and access to advisory services influence the acceptability and effectiveness of these practices. The findings highlight the need for tailored, integrative interventions that combine traditional knowledge and community participation with modern technologies to strengthen resilience in flood-prone communities. This study provides actionable insights for policymakers and development practitioners who aim to improve disaster risk reduction and climate resilience strategies in the Volta Basin.

Rural land plans (RLP) and the systematic cluster approach (SCA) are the two main approaches used in Benin to secure rural land tenure. However, the contributions of these approaches to land tenure security in rural communities are mixed. This paper firstly identifies the main factors to be considered in conceptualizing rural land tenure security and secondly assesses the contributions of the two approaches in achieving rural land tenure security. The study is conducted in four communes of Borgou (a district in North Benin) that have benefited from both approaches to land tenure security. The dimensions of land tenure security were identified during focus group discussions and unstructured interviews with key informants. The contribution of the approaches is assessed using individual surveys from 742 beneficiaries of the approaches randomly selected, based on actors’ perceptions measured on the Likert scale. The nonparametric Friedman test was used to determine the average rank of each factor according to the RLP or SCA context. As a result, land tenure security must integrate nine factors, leading to two forms of land tenure security. Legal and institutional security includes land tenure norms, property rights, local land management institutions, and the land information system. Socioenvironmental security involves access and use rights, social peace, gender mainstreaming, and land conservation. According to stakeholders’ perceptions, RLPs mainly lead to legal-institutional security, whereas SCA combines and contributes to both forms of land tenure security. Rural smallholders will enjoy high levels of land security when these elements are in dynamic balance.

Maize is the staple food of most households in sub-Saharan Africa. The adoption of stress-tolerant maize varieties (STMV) is being promoted due to climate change. There are various methods applied to disseminate these varieties. Unfortunately, the adoption at the household level is still unsatisfactory. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the dissemination methods used in Benin. We identified dissemination methods from key informants involved in STMV seed dissemination projects. The performance of the identified methods was assessed through the perceptions of 150 maize-farming households using the Likert scale. We assessed the extent to which each method leads to the knowledge, use, and continued use (appropriation) of STMV seeds. Friedman and Wilcoxon rank tests were used for data analysis. Nine dissemination methods were identified and categorized into four groups according to their theoretical driven: strengthening social ties, capacity building, incentive, and awareness raising. Our results revealed that dissemination methods that focus on strengthening social ties, raising awareness, and providing incentives are more effective in promoting STMV adoption. Depending on the intended adoption (awareness, use, and appropriation), extension services and STMV promotional projects could focus on strengthening social ties, raising awareness, and providing incentives. However, future research must identify which of the methods leads to a higher rate of adoption of STMV.