Soumaya Boussaid

Dr. Soumaya Boussaid

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 January 2022 in Journal of Reproductive Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSoumaya Boussaid
Soumaya Boussaid
YMYasmine Makhlouf
Yasmine Makhlouf
SRSonia Rekik
Sonia Rekik
SJSamia Jammali
Samia Jammali
ECElhem Cheour
Elhem Cheour
Helmi Ben SaadHelmi Ben Saad
Helmi Ben Saad

1 June 2023 in Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBSoumaya Boussaid
Soumaya Boussaid
MMMariem M’rAbet
Mariem M’rAbet
SRSonia Rekik
Sonia Rekik
SJSamia Jammali
Samia Jammali
SRSafa Rahmouni
Safa Rahmouni
MEMohamed Elleuch
Mohamed Elleuch
Tuberculosis is still endemic in Tunisia. Among musculoskeletal involvement, spinal tuberculosis (STB) or «Pott’s Disease» is the most common and can lead to serious neurological complications. The purpose of our study was to focus on STB features (clinical, biological, and radiological) and to identify factors associated with early unfavorable outcomes. This was a monocentric retrospective study, over a period of 20 years (2000–2020). Only patients treated appropriately were included. Patients’ informations were noted. We defined the favorable outcome criterion as weight gain, apyrexia, improvement of the general state, relief of pain, improvement in the classic inflammatory markers (CRP), and absence of vertebral deformities, neurological impairment, or sepsis. The outcome was considered unfavorable otherwise. Our study involved 52 patients. Their average age was 55.21 years±17.79. The average symptom duration was 8.9 months±6.54. Spinal pain was the most common functional sign (90.4%) often inflammatory. Physical signs were dominated by segmental spinal stiffness (71.2%). Spinal magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 38 patients. The disco-vertebral biopsy puncture confirmed the diagnosis in 15 cases. All patients received anti-tuberculosis treatments with an average duration of 10.02±1.97months. The outcome at one month of follow-up was favorable in 32 cases. Poor prognosis factors were normochromic normocytic anaemia (p=0.018), initial lymphocytosis (p=0.048), and fever (p=0.01). However, vertebral fracture at standard X-ray was predictive of favorable outcome (p=0.001). STB is a frequent condition that needs to be treated rapidly. Poor prognosis factors were identified in this study such as normocytic normochromic anemia, initial lymphocytosis, and fever at baseline.

1 October 2018 in The Egyptian Rheumatologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SRSonia Rekik
Sonia Rekik
IAImen Abdelkefi
Imen Abdelkefi
SBSoumaya Boussaid
Soumaya Boussaid
ICIlhem Cheour
Ilhem Cheour
HSHela Sahli
Hela Sahli
MEMohamed Elleuch
Mohamed Elleuch

1 December 2023 in Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBSoumaya Boussaid
Soumaya Boussaid
RARania Ben Aissa
Rania Ben Aissa
SRSonia Rekik
Sonia Rekik
SRSafa Rahmouni
Safa Rahmouni
SJSamia Jammali
Samia Jammali
MEMohamed Elleuch
Mohamed Elleuch
The clinical screening of enthesitis and synovitis in patients with psoriasis lacks specificity and sensitivity during the preclinical phase. to assess US subclinical synovitis and enthesitis in psoriatic patients compared with healthy controls. A cross-sectional study on 40 psoriatic patients and 40 healthy sex- and age-matched controls. US examination of 18 joints was performed along with 22 entheseal sites on the upper and lower limbs. US subscores were established according to the US abnormalities: inflammatory score (tendon thickening, hypoechogenicity, bursitis, Doppler signal), damage score (calcification, enthesophytes, bone erosion) and total score (the sum of inflammatory and damage scores). US synovitis were more frequent in psoriatic patients (0.68%) than in controls (0.29%), but the difference was not significant. Patients with psoriasis had more US enthesitis (92,5%) compared to controls (40%)(p<0.001). The total number of enthesitis was higher in the psoriatic group (20.90%) compared to controls (4,78%)(p<0.001). There were more US abnormalities in the psoriatic group compared to controls for calcaneal tendon enthesis(p<0.001), distal patellar tendon enthesis(p<0.001) and deep flexor tendons of the finger enthesis(p<0.001). Compared to controls, psoriatic patients had a significantly higher inflammatory score (Mean±SD) (2.85±3.34 versus 0.58±1.17), damage score (3±2.57 versus 0.60±1.41), and total score (5.85±5.20 versus 1.18±2.07) (p < 0.001 each). Patients with scalp psoriasis had more US enthesitis (p=0.020). Our results indicate that US enthesitis and synovitis are more frequent in patients with psoriasis. Prospective studies with larger sample size are needed to define the contribution of US in predicting the clinical onset of PsA.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSoumaya Boussaid
Soumaya Boussaid
RDRim Dhahri
Rim Dhahri
SRSafa Rahmouni
Safa Rahmouni
Halil İbrahim CeylanHalil İbrahim Ceylan
Halil İbrahim Ceylan
MHMarwa Hassayoun
Marwa Hassayoun
HSHela Sahli
Hela Sahli
Background: The management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has advanced significantly with the introduction of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). Despite these therapeutic strides, RA prognosis remains profoundly affected by comorbid conditions, particularly cardiovascular and metabolic complications, which increase both morbidity and mortality. The role of bDMARDs in modulating comorbidities remains underexplored, with limited evidence on their effects across various non-RA conditions, such as respiratory, diabetic, and hematologic disorders. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of bDMARDs on the progression and outcomes of comorbidities in RA patients, providing insights to guide personalized treatment approaches. Methods: This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022345903) and followed the PRISMA guidelines. Original research articles from PubMed and Scopus, published up to 18 July 2024, were included. Studies assessing the impact of bDMARDs on comorbidities in RA patients met the eligibility criteria. Results: A total of thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. They were published from inception until July 2024. The studied comorbidities included pulmonary conditions (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and interstitial lung disease) (n = 2); diabetes (n = 3); anemia (n = 3); and malignancies (n = 3). The bDMARDs studied were tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) (n = 9); Rituximab (n = 5); Tocilizumab (n = 5); Abatacept (n = 5); and Anakinra (n = 2). The most reported effects of bDMARDs on comorbidities were the following: (i) an exacerbation of pulmonary comorbidities for Abatacept and TNFis; (ii) patients switched to or initiated on Abatacept as their first targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (tDMARD) showed directionally lower rates and costs of T2DM-related complications compared with patients switching to or initiating other tDMARDs; (iii) there was no difference between Abatacept and TNFis or Rituximab/Tocilizumab regarding diabetes treatment switching or intensification; (iv) Anakinra significantly reduced the HbA1c%; (v) decreased serum hepcidin levels and improvement in anemia were observed in patients treated with TNFis or Tocilizumab; and (vi) no decrease in overall survival time or the significant incident malignancy rate was noted in RA patients. Conclusions: Overall, bDMARDs appear safe for use in RA patients with comorbidities and may even provide specific benefits for conditions such as anemia and diabetes. These findings suggest that clinicians could consider tailoring biologic therapy based on each patient’s comorbidity profile, potentially enhancing both RA management and comorbidity outcomes. For instance, selecting biologics such as Anakinra or Tocilizumab might be advantageous for RA patients with concurrent diabetes or anemia, given their observed metabolic and hematologic benefits. This personalized approach could improve the quality of life and reduce healthcare costs by addressing RA and associated comorbidities more effectively.

1 June 2020 in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CDC. Daldoul
C. Daldoul
SBSoumaya Boussaid
Soumaya Boussaid
SJS. Jemmali
S. Jemmali
SRSonia Rekik
Sonia Rekik
HSH. Sahli
H. Sahli
MEM. Elleuch
M. Elleuch
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem among all age groups. Medical students do not seem to be spared. In fact LBP is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorder and its prevalence is variable ranging from 41% to 72%. Objectives: The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of LBP among Tunisian medical students and to assess its associated factors. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study over 2 months carried out on medical students in a Tunisian medical college. A digital questionnaire entered by Google forms was sent by e-mail and was completed by the students. Our study included students from the first year of the first cycle of medical studies up to the third year of the second cycle. Socio-demographic, personal characteristics and life habits were collected. LBP was assessed using the Nordic musculoskeletal health questionnaire. The impact of low back pain was assessed using the Oswestry disability index (ODI). Results: One hundred and seventy-nine students were included. The mean age was 22.9 ± 2.3 years [19.64-38.21]. The sex ratio was 0.29. The average body mass index was 23.55 ± 4.22 kg / m2 [17.67-43.07]. 82% of the students were in the second cycle of medical studies. 26.4% of the students had a regular sports activity. 91.2% spent more than 4 hours a day in a sitting position. The point, annual, and lifetime prevalence of LBP among medical students was 41.2%, 80.4% and 90.6%, respectively. Low back pain was acute in more than 58.8%, subacute in 14.9% and chronic in 26.3%. The mean ODI score was 10.32% ± 8.48% [0-32%]. Students with LBP were significantly younger than students without LBP (p = 0.015). LBP was more common in students who spent more than 4 hours in a sitting position with a difference at the limit of significance (p = 0.059). Being in the 2nd cycle was significantly associated with the occurrence of LBP (p = 0.006). Poor screen projection in the amphitheater was significantly associated with the occurrence of LBP (p = 0.029).We found a statistically very significant relationship between the occurrence of LBP and the poor layout of the amphitheaters (p = 0.000). The feeling of depression was significantly higher among LBP students (p = 0.018). Feelings of fatigue, being overwhelmed, irritability and worry were more frequently found in LBP students, but this difference was not statistically significant. In a multivariate analysis, the only factors that remained statistically significant were feeling of depression (p = 0.046, OR = 3.88; CI = [1,3-11,55]) and the poor layout of the amphitheaters (p = 0.006, OR = 8.99; CI = [2.55-31.69]). Conclusion: The annual prevalence of LBP was 80.4%. These results testify to the magnitude of this health problem. The factors associated to LBP seemed to be essentially modifiable factors. This encourages special attention from medical schools to increase students’ awareness of low back pain and to provide appropriate measures at reduce this musculoskeletal disorder. Disclosure of Interests: None declared