Background: Vitamin B12 (B12) has a fundamental role in both central and peripheral nervous system function at all ages. Neurologic manifestations may be the earliest and often the only manifestation of B12 deficiency. Mostly because of the poor sensitivity of methods of determination for B12 levels, peripheral neuropathy remains a classical but underdiagnosed complication of B12 deficiency. So the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of B12-responsive neuropathy are not well known. Methods: A retrospective study of patients with B12-responsive neuropathy was conducted at our hospital on a 3-year period. The criteria for inclusion were: (a) neuropathy confirmed by the electrophysiological study (nerve conduction study); and (b) improvement of at least 1 point of the total Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale score after vitamin B12 treatment. Results: Nine patients were identified. Serum B12 level was low in only four. Four patients had sensorimotor (predominantly sensory) axonal polyneuropathy while five had only sensory neuronopathy. Six improved in less than 1 month after B12 supplementation. Conclusion: B12-responsive neuropathy is a more heterogeneous group of neuropathy than previously described. B12 deficiency is a cause of peripheral neuropathy and should systematically be ruled out in the clinical setting of idiopathic neuropathy or sensory neuronopathy because of potential reversibility. Abbreviations: B12: vitamin B12; CMAP: compound muscle action potentials; DRG: dorsal root ganglia; ENMG: electroneuromyography; MCCT: motor central conduction time; MEP: motor evoked potentials; MMA: methylmalonic acid; MMCoAM: L-methylmalonyl–CoenzymeA mutase; ONLS: overall neuropathy limitations scale; SCV: sensory conduction velocities; SNAP: sensory nerve action potentials; SNN: sensory neuronopathy; SSS: SNAP sum score

Vitamin B12 (B12) deficiency is known to be associated with various neurological manifestations. Although central manifestations such as dementia or subacute combined degeneration are the most classic, neurological manifestations also include sensory neuropathies. However, B12 deficiency is still rarely integrated as a potential cause of sensory neuronopathy. Moreover, as many medical conditions can falsely normalize serum B12 levels even in the context of a real B12 deficiency, some cases may easily remain underdiagnosed. We report the illustrating case of an anorexic patient with sensory neuronopathy and consistently normal serum B12 levels. After all classical causes of sensory neuronopathy were ruled out, her clinical and electrophysiological conditions first worsened after folate administration, but finally improved dramatically after B12 administration. B12 deficiency should be systematically part of the etiologic workup of sensory neuronopathy, especially in a high risk context such as anorexia nervosa.

Introduction: To provide information about the needs of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using Carenity, the first European online platform for patients with chronic diseases. Methods: At one year after its creation, all posts from the Carenity SLE community were collected and analysed. A focused cross-sectional online survey was performed. Results: The SLE community included 521 people (93% females; mean age: 39.8 years). Among a total of 6702 posts, 2232 were classified according to disease-related topics. The 10 most common topics were ‘lupus and …’ either ‘treatment’, ‘fatigue’, ‘entourage’, ‘sun exposure’, ‘diagnosis’, ‘autoimmune diseases’, ‘pregnancy’, ‘contraception’, ‘symptoms’ or ‘sexuality’. 112 SLE patients participated in the online survey. At the time of diagnosis, only 17 (15%) patients had heard of SLE and 84 (75%) expressed a need for more information on outcomes (27%), treatments (27%), daily life (14%), patients' associations (11%), symptoms (8%), the disease (8%) and psychosocial aspects (7%). When treatment was initiated, 48 patients (43%) would have liked more information about side effects (46%), long-term effects (21%), treatment duration/cessation (12.5%) and type (10%) and mechanism of action (8%) of treatments. All participants except one had used the internet to find information about SLE. Sources of information included healthcare providers (51%/61%/67%), journals/magazines (7%/12%/6%), lupus Websites (51%/77%/40%), web forums/blogs (34%/53%/19%), patients' associations (11%/23%/9%) accessed at ‘just before diagnosis’, ‘just after diagnosis’ and ‘before treatment initiation’. Conclusions: Online patient communities provide original unbiased information that can help improve provision of information to SLE patients.

To describe extra-haematological manifestations associated with human parvovirus B19 (HPV-B19) infection. We conducted a nationwide multicentre study to retrospectively describe the characteristics and outcome of extra-haematological manifestations in French adults. Data from 25 patients followed from 2001 to 2016 were analysed. Median age was 37.9 years (range: 22.7–83.4), with a female predominance (sex ratio: 4/1). Only 3 patients had an underlying predisposing condition (hemoglobinopathy or pregnancy). The most common manifestations were joint (80%) and skin (60%) involvement. Four patients (16%) had renal involvement (endocapillary proliferative or membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis). Three patients (12%) had peripheral nervous system involvement (mononeuritis, mononeuritis multiplex, Guillain-Barré syndrome) and 2 (8%) presented muscle involvement. Other manifestations included hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (n = 1), myopericarditis and pleural effusion (n = 1), and lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly mimicking lymphoma with spleen infarcts (n = 1). Immunological abnormalities were frequent (56.5%). At 6 months, all patients were alive, and 54.2% were in complete remission. In 2 patients, joint involvement evolved into rheumatoid arthritis. Six patients (24%) received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), with a good response in the 3 patients with peripheral nervous system involvement. HPV-B19 infection should be considered in a wide range of clinical manifestations. Although the prognosis is good, IVIg therapy should be discussed in patients with peripheral nerve involvement. However, its efficacy should be further investigated in prospective studies.

Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe manifestation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). The therapeutic strategy relies on kidney biopsy (KB) results. We tested whether urinary peptidome analysis could non-invasively differentiate active from non-active LN. Design: Urinary samples were collected from 93 patients (55 with active LN and 38 with non-active LN), forming a discovery (n = 42) and an independent validation (n = 51) cohort. Clinical characteristics were collected at inclusion and prospectively for 24 months. The urinary peptidome was analyzed by capillary-electrophoresis coupled to mass-spectrometry, comparing active LN to non-active LN, and assessing chronic lesions and response to therapy. The value of previously validated prognostic (CKD273) and differential diagnostic (LN172) signatures was evaluated. Results: Urinary peptides could not discriminate between active and non-active LN or predict early response to therapy. Tubulo-interstitial fibrosis was correlated to the CKD273. The LN172 score identified 92.5% of samples as LN. Few patients developed new-onset CKD. Conclusions: We validated the CKD273 and LN172 classifiers but did not identify a robust signature that could predict active LN and replace KB. The value of urinary peptidome to predict long-term CKD, or renal flares in SLE, remains to be evaluated.