Samantha Teague

Dr. Samantha Teague

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 February 2019 in Psychological Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAdrian Shatte
Adrian Shatte
DHDelyse M. Hutchinson
Delyse M. Hutchinson
STSamantha Teague
Samantha Teague
Background: This paper aims to synthesise the literature on machine learning (ML) and big data applications for mental health, highlighting current research and applications in practice.Methods: We employed a scoping review methodology to rapidly map the field of ML in mental health. Eight health and information technology research databases were searched for papers covering this domain. Articles were assessed by two reviewers, and data were extracted on the article's mental health application, ML technique, data type, and study results. Articles were then synthesised via narrative review.Results: Three hundred papers focusing on the application of ML to mental health were identified. Four main application domains emerged in the literature, including: (i) detection and diagnosis; (ii) prognosis, treatment and support; (iii) public health, and; (iv) research and clinical administration. The most common mental health conditions addressed included depression, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease. ML techniques used included support vector machines, decision trees, neural networks, latent Dirichlet allocation, and clustering.Conclusions: Overall, the application of ML to mental health has demonstrated a range of benefits across the areas of diagnosis, treatment and support, research, and clinical administration. With the majority of studies identified focusing on the detection and diagnosis of mental health conditions, it is evident that there is significant room for the application of ML to other areas of psychology and mental health. The challenges of using ML techniques are discussed, as well as opportunities to improve and advance the field.

26 November 2018 in BMC Medical Research Methodology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TTthe SEED Lifecourse Sciences Theme
the SEED Lifecourse Sciences Theme
STSamantha Teague
Samantha Teague
GYGeorge J. Youssef
George J. Youssef
JMJacqui A. Macdonald
Jacqui A. Macdonald
ESEmma Sciberras
Emma Sciberras
DHDelyse Hutchinson
Delyse Hutchinson
Participant retention strategies that minimise attrition in longitudinal cohort studies have evolved considerably in recent years. This study aimed to assess, via systematic review and meta-analysis, the effectiveness of both traditional strategies and contemporary innovations for retention adopted by longitudinal cohort studies in the past decade. Health research databases were searched for retention strategies used within longitudinal cohort studies published in the 10-years prior, with 143 eligible longitudinal cohort studies identified (141 articles; sample size range: 30 to 61,895). Details on retention strategies and rates, research designs, and participant demographics were extracted. Meta-analyses of retained proportions were performed to examine the association between cohort retention rate and individual and thematically grouped retention strategies. Results identified 95 retention strategies, broadly classed as either: barrier-reduction, community-building, follow-up/reminder, or tracing strategies. Forty-four of these strategies had not been identified in previous reviews. Meta-regressions indicated that studies using barrier-reduction strategies retained 10% more of their sample (95%CI [0.13 to 1.08]; p = .01); however, studies using follow-up/reminder strategies lost an additional 10% of their sample (95%CI [− 1.19 to − 0.21]; p = .02). The overall number of strategies employed was not associated with retention. Employing a larger number of retention strategies may not be associated with improved retention in longitudinal cohort studies, contrary to earlier narrative reviews. Results suggest that strategies that aim to reduce participant burden (e.g., flexibility in data collection methods) might be most effective in maximising cohort retention.

15 June 2023 in Archives of Women's Mental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GOGypsy A. O’dEa
Gypsy A. O’dEa
GYGeorge J. Youssef
George J. Youssef
LHLauryn J. Hagg
Lauryn J. Hagg
LFLauren M. Francis
Lauren M. Francis
ESElizabeth A. Spry
Elizabeth A. Spry
JMJacqui A. Macdonald
Jacqui A. Macdonald
Purpose: Maternal psychological distress and mother-infant bonding problems each predict poorer offspring outcomes. They are also related to each other, yet the extensive literature reporting their association has not been meta-analysed.Methods: We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, ProQuest DTG, and OATD for English-language peer-reviewed and grey literature reporting an association between mother-infant bonding, and multiple indicators of maternal psychological distress.Results: We included 133 studies representing 118 samples; 99 samples (110,968 mothers) were eligible for meta-analysis. Results showed concurrent associations across a range of timepoints during the first year postpartum, between bonding problems and depression (r= .27 [95% CI 0.20, 0.35] tor= .47 [95% CI 0.41, 0.53]), anxiety (r= .27 [95% CI 0.24, 0.31] tor= .39 [95% CI 0.15, 0.59]), and stress (r= .46 [95% CI 0.40, 0.52]). Associations between antenatal distress and subsequent postpartum bonding problems were mostly weaker and with wider confidence intervals: depression (r= .20 [95% CI 0.14, 0.50] tor= .25 [95% CI 0.64, 0.85]), anxiety (r= .16 [95% CI 0.10, 0.22]), and stress (r= .15 [95% CI − 0.67, 0.80]). Pre-conception depression and anxiety were associated with postpartum bonding problems (r= − 0.17 [95% CI − 0.22, − 0.11]).Conclusion: Maternal psychological distress is associated with postpartum mother-infant bonding problems. Co-occurrence of psychological distress and bonding problems is common, but should not be assumed. There may be benefit in augmenting existing perinatal screening programs with well-validated mother-infant bonding measures.

6 July 2019 in Social Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GBGenevieve A. Le Bas
Genevieve A. Le Bas
GYGeorge J. Youssef
George J. Youssef
JMJacqui A. Macdonald
Jacqui A. Macdonald
LRLarissa Rossen
Larissa Rossen
STSamantha Teague
Samantha Teague
DHDelyse M. Hutchinson
Delyse M. Hutchinson

1 June 2022 in Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGenevieve Le Bas
Genevieve Le Bas
GYGeorge Youssef
George Youssef
JMJacqui A. Macdonald
Jacqui A. Macdonald
STSamantha Teague
Samantha Teague
RMRichard Mattick
Richard Mattick
DHDelyse Hutchinson
Delyse Hutchinson

1 March 2017 in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STSamantha Teague
Samantha Teague
KGKylie M. Gray
Kylie M. Gray
BTBruce J. Tonge
Bruce J. Tonge
LNLouise K. Newman
Louise K. Newman