Macary Weck Marciniak

Dr. Macary Weck Marciniak


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2016 in Vaccine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMelissa B. Gilkey
Melissa B. Gilkey
WCWilliam A Calo
William A Calo
JMJennifer Moss
Jennifer Moss
PSParth D. Shah
Parth D. Shah
MMMacary Weck Marciniak
Macary Weck Marciniak
NBNoel Brewer
Noel Brewer

1 July 2018 in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRShannon E. Rudolph
Shannon E. Rudolph
ABAshley R. Branham
Ashley R. Branham
LRLaura A. Rhodes
Laura A. Rhodes
HHHarskin “Hj” Hayes
Harskin “Hj” Hayes
JMJoseph S. Moose
Joseph S. Moose
MMMacary Weck Marciniak
Macary Weck Marciniak

1 March 2019 in American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LRLaura A. Rhodes
Laura A. Rhodes
MMMacary Weck Marciniak
Macary Weck Marciniak
JMJacqueline McLaughlin
Jacqueline McLaughlin
CMCarlos R. Melendez
Carlos R. Melendez
KLKim I. Leadon
Kim I. Leadon
NPNicole R. Pinelli
Nicole R. Pinelli
Objective. To examine entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as an assessment tool for student pharmacists completing early practice experiences. Methods. Students completed a 2-month practice experience upon conclusion of their first year. Student performance on EPAs was assessed by preceptors and students at the midpoint and conclusion of the experience using a scale that ranged from dependent (1.0) to independent (5.0). Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test assessed for differences between the midpoint and final evaluations on student self-evaluations and between the midpoint and final evaluation on preceptor-student evaluations. Cronbach’s α assessed reliability of the EPAs. Results. From May to August 2016, 147 students completed a practice experience. Student-self and preceptor-student evaluations at the midpoint and final approximated a median score of 3.0 (IQR 2) and 4.0 (IQR 3), respectively, on EPAs 1-14. Analyses revealed statistically significant increases from midpoint to final evaluation for all constructs on both evaluations. Cronbach’s α yielded scores of 0.98 for the preceptor evaluations and 0.95 for the student self-evaluation. Conclusion. There was an increase in student performance over time. The EPA statements may be a reliable assessment tool for student performance in pharmacy education.

1 July 2019 in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJessica Sinclair
Jessica Sinclair
OBOlivia Santoso Bentley
Olivia Santoso Bentley
AAAmina Abubakar
Amina Abubakar
LRLaura A. Rhodes
Laura A. Rhodes
MMMacary Weck Marciniak
Macary Weck Marciniak

1 August 2019 in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TCTak Casey
Tak Casey
MMMacary Weck Marciniak
Macary Weck Marciniak
ASAmanda Savage
Amanda Savage
SOSachiko Ozawa
Sachiko Ozawa
Older adults share a disproportionately high burden of vaccine-preventable diseases. Despite recommendations from national and international health organizations, vaccination rates among older patients remain suboptimal, suggesting poor access and barriers to vaccination. Pharmacists are uniquely positioned to assist patients in overcoming many of these barriers. In this commentary, we describe some of the common barriers to vaccination that older adults encounter and the role pharmacists have in overcoming these barriers, in the US and abroad. We provide a case study of pharmacists’ impact in supporting herpes zoster vaccination. We also identify areas of opportunities to promote further pharmacist involvement in vaccination efforts.

23 May 2024 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OOOlufeyisayo O Odebunmi
Olufeyisayo O Odebunmi
THTamera Hughes
Tamera Hughes
AWAustin Waters
Austin Waters
BUBenjamin Urick
Benjamin Urick
CHCaroline Herron
Caroline Herron
PSParth D Shah
Parth D Shah
Background: Telehealth (telemedicine and telepharmacy) services increase access to patient services and ensure continuity of care. However, few studies have assessed factors that influence patients’ willingness to use telehealth services, and we sought to investigate this. Objective: This study aims to examine respondents’ (aged between 45 and 75 years) willingness to use telehealth services (telepharmacy and telemedicine) and the correlates of the willingness to use telehealth services. Methods: We administered a cross-sectional national survey of 1045 noninstitutionalized US adults aged between 45 and 75 years in March and April 2021. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify demographic and health service use correlates of self-reported willingness to use telehealth services. Results: Overall willingness to use telemedicine was high (674/1045, 64.5%). Adults aged 55 years and older were less willing to use telemedicine (aged between 55 and 64 years: odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.86; aged 65 years or older: OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22-0.49) than those younger than 55 years. Those with a regular provider (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1-1.02) and long travel times (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.03-2.98) were more willing to use telemedicine compared to those without a regular provider and had shorter travel times, respectively. Willingness to use telemedicine services increased from 64.5% (674/1045) to 83% (867/1045) if the service was low-cost or insurance-covered, was with their existing health care provider, or was easy-to-use. Overall willingness to use telepharmacy was 76.7% (801/1045). Adults aged older than 55 years were less willing to use telepharmacy (aged between 55 and 64 years: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86; aged 65 years or older: OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15-0.37) than those younger than 55 years. Those who rated pharmacy service quality higher were more willing to use telepharmacy (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09) than those who did not. Conclusions: Respondents were generally willing to use telehealth (telemedicine and telepharmacy) services, but the likelihood of their being willing to use telehealth decreased as they were older. For those initially unwilling (aged 55 years or older) to use telemedicine services, inexpensive or insurance-covered services were acceptable.